On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 02:57, Felipe Pena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Marcus,
>
> Em Qua, 2008-08-27 às 23:47 +0200, Marcus Boerger escreveu:
>> Hello Hannes,
>>
>> Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 8:32:41 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 18:27, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> ext/sessions/mod_files.c:281 has a hardcoded openbasedir-check
>> skipping of "/tmp" path for storing session-files, if
>> sessions.save_path is not manually set.
>
> I would think the idea was to make it easi
Hello Marcus,
Em Qua, 2008-08-27 às 23:47 +0200, Marcus Boerger escreveu:
> Hello Hannes,
>
> Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 8:32:41 PM, you wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 18:27, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> - Curly braces support for namespaces (Marcus, not ready for alp
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> ext/sessions/mod_files.c:281 has a hardcoded openbasedir-check
>> skipping of "/tmp" path for storing session-files, if
>> sessions.save_path is not manually set.
>
> I would think the idea was to make it eas
Hi!
ext/sessions/mod_files.c:281 has a hardcoded openbasedir-check
skipping of "/tmp" path for storing session-files, if
sessions.save_path is not manually set.
I would think the idea was to make it easier on inexperienced users.
Since default AFAIK is /tmp, and it is highly unlikely that som
Hello Hannes,
Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 8:32:41 PM, you wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 18:27, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> - Curly braces support for namespaces (Marcus, not ready for alpha2)
> Why not? I thought I saw a patch for this on the list recently (which
> allowed
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 18:27, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Curly braces support for namespaces (Marcus, not ready for alpha2)
Why not? I thought I saw a patch for this on the list recently (which
allowed both the current namespace foo; and namespace foo {}
syntaxes)..
-Hannes
Travis Swicegood schrieb:
> Yes, as we talked about earlier in the year on IRC and on the wiki.
Interesting, almost everybody I talked to about this was not even aware
of your PHPT project and thought you meant run-tests.php by it.
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastia
Ok, looking forward to the release in october then, thanks.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Alexey Zakhlestin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Guillaume Theoret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As far as I can tell gmp_testbit was written 15 months ago (committed
>> Apr
On Aug 27, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
So the student worked on PHPT instead of run-tests.php?
Yes, as we talked about earlier in the year on IRC and on the wiki.
For those of you who don't know what PHPT is: It's a ground-up
rewrite of the PEAR_RunTest code (which was b
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Guillaume Theoret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I can tell gmp_testbit was written 15 months ago (committed
> April 30, 2007?) but it's still sitting in CVS and is the only
> function in the gmp library ( http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.gmp.php
> ) documen
As far as I can tell gmp_testbit was written 15 months ago (committed
April 30, 2007?) but it's still sitting in CVS and is the only
function in the gmp library ( http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.gmp.php
) documented but still unavailable.
I'm using gmp_scan1 right now but my bloom filter would be
Travis Swicegood schrieb:
> All that said, I'm shooting for a 1.0 of PHPT by the end of the year.
So the student worked on PHPT instead of run-tests.php?
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514
Hey guys;
On Aug 27, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 10:46 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
There was a run-tests.php rewrite application accepted for gsoc this
summer.. I however haven't heard a word about it since then..
Does anyone know the status of that projec
> well, in case there are no objections I will remove special treatment
> of "/tmp" path in sessions code of 5.3 and 6.0
> should 5.2 also be "fixed"?
i would not put this into 5.2 this late into the lifetime of this branch.
regards,
Lukas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing Lis
well, in case there are no objections I will remove special treatment
of "/tmp" path in sessions code of 5.3 and 6.0
should 5.2 also be "fixed"?
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Alexey Zakhlestin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ext/sessions/mod_files.c:281 has a hardcoded openbasedir-check
> skippin
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 10:46 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > There was a run-tests.php rewrite application accepted for gsoc this
> > summer.. I however haven't heard a word about it since then..
> > Does anyone know the status of that project?
>
> Still no reply to this? I suppose the project is
Hi,
If nobody is working on it this task, I may take it. (I will keep on
working on my project as long as possible, but I have too much on my
head right now to do 'creative' stuff - need something with clearly
defined goals).
If Sebastian or Travis (they mentored this project, didn't they?)
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 17:15, Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because it was the easiest way to fix this: __FILE__ is not same with clean
> > and actual test sections,
> > so the clean section code did nothing however you run the tests..
ext/sessions/mod_files.c:281 has a hardcoded openbasedir-check
skipping of "/tmp" path for storing session-files, if
sessions.save_path is not manually set.
This leads to the failure of session_save_path_variation5 test on mac
os x, as default temporary path here is "/var/tmp" and not "/tmp"
Anyw
20 matches
Mail list logo
