[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] [Fwd: #45687 [Opn->Bgs]: Why is PCNTL marked experimental]

2008-08-02 Thread Hannes Magnusson
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 19:19, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Maciek Sokolewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Right, so, if this _is_ still considered experimental, then we should fix it >> in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix the con

Re: [PHP-DEV] __invoke concerns

2008-08-02 Thread Lars Strojny
Hi Etienne, Am Samstag, den 02.08.2008, 19:36 +0200 schrieb Etienne Kneuss: [...] > 1) I don't believe that having it thrown as another of those magic > method is a good idea. Rather, I'd like to have it represented by an > interface: Invokable. That way, type hints/checks can be done in user > la

Re: [PHP-DEV] Another PECL candidate and more extension considerations.

2008-08-02 Thread Jani Taskinen
Derick Rethans kirjoitti: On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Marcus Boerger wrote: 2) We might not really be ready for one and continue doing as we've always done. Select a nice collection of extension that aims to make the majority of our userbase happy. And suggest defaults this way whether or not they are

[PHP-DEV] __invoke concerns

2008-08-02 Thread Etienne Kneuss
Hi, this is probably not the best time to raise concerns about __invoke (closures) now that alpha1 is already realeased, but I believe it's worth it. 1) I don't believe that having it thrown as another of those magic method is a good idea. Rather, I'd like to have it represented by an interface:

Re: [PHP-DEV] [Fwd: #45687 [Opn->Bgs]: Why is PCNTL marked experimental]

2008-08-02 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Maciek Sokolewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, so, if this _is_ still considered experimental, then we should fix it > in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix the configure script. > > Which one will it be? :) Please use the bug report to re

[PHP-DEV] [Fwd: #45687 [Opn->Bgs]: Why is PCNTL marked experimental]

2008-08-02 Thread Maciek Sokolewicz
Right, so, if this _is_ still considered experimental, then we should fix it in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix the configure script. Which one will it be? :) - Tul Original Message Subject: #45687 [Opn->Bgs]: Why is PCNTL marked experimental Date: Sat, 2 A

Re: [PHP-DEV] enabling everything by default

2008-08-02 Thread Antony Dovgal
On 01.08.2008 18:34, Chris Stockton wrote: Is their a particular reason you are against giving users such a variety of tools? I'm against enabling untested and unmaintained extensions by default, especially if they are known to cause problems. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal -- PHP Internals - PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] enabling everything by default

2008-08-02 Thread Moriyoshi Koizumi
Hi, Antony Dovgal wrote: Extensions enabled by default in 5.3: ctype date dom ereg fileinfo - new, untested. filter hash iconv json libxml pcre PDO pdo_sqlite Phar - new, untested posix Reflection session SimpleXML SPL SQLite sqlite3 - new, untested standard tokenizer xml xmlreader xmlwriter --

Re: [PHP-DEV] Another PECL candidate and more extension considerations.

2008-08-02 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Marcus Boerger wrote: > 2) We might not really be ready for one and continue doing as we've always > done. Select a nice collection of extension that aims to make the majority > of our userbase happy. And suggest defaults this way whether or not they > are enabled by default. T