Felipe Pena wrote:
felipe Sat Jun 21 22:07:53 2008 UTC
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_3)
/php-src/ext/gd gd.c
/php-src/ext/gd/tests lines.phpt
Log:
- New parameter parsing API
/usr/local/src/php/php-5.3/ext/gd/gd.c: In function 'zif_imagegammacorrect':
/u
On 6/22/08, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You do now.
thanks.
checked in
--
Alexey Zakhlestin
http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
2008/6/21 Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
>>
>> On 6/22/08, David Coallier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2008/6/21 Alexey Zakhlestin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
I did curl for 5.3
>>
>> I don't have karma.
>
> You do now.
Cheers Mr. L
--
Slan,
David
--
P
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On 6/22/08, David Coallier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/6/21 Alexey Zakhlestin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I did curl for 5.3
I don't have karma.
You do now.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 6/22/08, David Coallier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/21 Alexey Zakhlestin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I did curl for 5.3
I don't have karma.
did attachment come to the list?
anyway, here is the file: http://filez.indeyets.pp.ru/curl.diff
--
Alexey Zakhlestin
http://blog.milkfarmsoft.co
2008/6/21 Alexey Zakhlestin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I did curl for 5.3
>
Grand! did you commit it already?
--
Slan,
David
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I did curl for 5.3
On 6/20/08, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While we nearing the release of 5.3 (hopefully?), there are many functions
> in the PHP code which still use old parameter parsing API
> (zend_get_parameters_ex) instead of the new one (zend_parse_parameters).
Jessie Hernandez wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> How is this different from my original proposal
> (http://news.php.net/php.internals/34097,
> http://news.php.net/php.internals/34097)?
>
>
The patch committed only affects non-namespaced code, your proposal
affected all code. In other words, this always wor
Hi Greg,
How is this different from my original proposal
(http://news.php.net/php.internals/34097,
http://news.php.net/php.internals/36822)?
--
Jessie Hernandez
Zend Certified Engineer (http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND006359&r=222727282)
Gregory Beaver wrote:
Hi,
You probably have seen D
Hi Greg,
How is this different from my original proposal
(http://news.php.net/php.internals/34097,
http://news.php.net/php.internals/34097)?
--
Jessie Hernandez
Zend Certified Engineer (http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND006359&r=222727282)
Gregory Beaver wrote:
Hi,
You probably have seen D
Hello,
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:51 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> So, I really would like to revert that foward_static_call stuff and
>> implement the parent:: patch instead, while it's still possible.
>>
>> thoughts?
>
> Didn't we discuss that already? Adding magic
Hello Dmitry,
Friday, June 20, 2008, 2:19:46 PM, you wrote:
> No it won't.
> Dmitry.
> Lars Strojny wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry, hi Christian,
>>
>> Am Freitag, den 20.06.2008, 15:12 +0400 schrieb Dmitry Stogov:
>>> $func = function ($x, $y) use $a, $b, $c {
>>> }
I really like your style here :-)
W
Hello Stanislav,
Friday, June 20, 2008, 7:44:10 PM, you wrote:
> Hi!
>> As one of the Haskell list denizens commented, is there a potential for
>> memory
>> leakage if lambdas implicitly import $this when defined within an object
> Not really leakage (if refcounts done right) but lifetimes e
On 6/21/08, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On top of that, by making parent:: forward called class name, you remove
> the possibility of doing non-forwarding call to the parent class.
why would anyone need that?
"parent" is related to inheritance and it is logical, that it reta
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Didn't we discuss that already?
It was discussed but there was never any kind of agreement nor was there
ever any kind of vote. The only reason the discussion stopped is that I
wanted to be sure SOME way of forward
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Didn't we discuss that already?
It was discussed but there was never any kind of agreement nor was there
ever any kind of vote. The only reason the discussion stopped is that I
wanted to be sure SOME way of forward
16 matches
Mail list logo
