Stefan Priebsch schrieb:
> Richard Lynch schrieb:
>> If a web service really doesn't care whether it is responding to GET
>> or POST or even forged COOKIES to product its output, why would it not
>> just use REQUEST?
>>
>> It's not as if it's any harder to forge GET vs. POST vs. COOKIE data,
>> rea
Richard Lynch schrieb:
If a web service really doesn't care whether it is responding to GET
or POST or even forged COOKIES to product its output, why would it not
just use REQUEST?
It's not as if it's any harder to forge GET vs. POST vs. COOKIE data,
really.
You can easily have sombeody inadve
On Sat, January 5, 2008 2:48 pm, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Hello,
>>> typing into PHP, even if it is optional. Passing $_REQUEST['age']
>>> to a
>>>
>> that $_REQUEST['age'] has been checked for numeric before the
>> functio
>
> would you please not use $_REQUEST in any of your examples? $_REQUEST
> i
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:55:46 -0600 (CST), "Richard Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I don't believe the PHP Dev Team ...
8
> Larry may have said it best "call it a poll and be done with it"
Can we take a vote on that? :
-1
Another way of doing something already simple does not improve the
language, imho, only degrades maintenance and documentation.
If you have a time machine and can go back and make Rasmus do it this
way from the beginning, fine, but not now.
--
Some people have a "gift" link here.
Know what I
On Fri, January 11, 2008 4:13 pm, Sam Barrow wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 00:52 +0300, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>> On 11.01.2008 22:13, Sam Barrow wrote:
>> >> input from many people is great, moreover - it is necessary.
>> However, it
>> >> is not the same as deciding by arithmetical majority of vot
I don't believe the PHP Dev Team has ever claimed that votes counted
for anything at all.
IIRC, the last known Dev Team structure was defined as "benevolent junta"
I do not think anybody who can count past 10 with their shoes on can
mistake "benevolent junta" for a vote-based democracy. :-)
Larr
Rasmus Lerdorf skrev:
PHP is first and foremost a Web scripting language. Everything we do
and every decision is based on that.
There is one aspect that has popped up in the discussion about array
syntax but not here where it is almost as applicable.
ECMAScript 4 will have introduce *option
On Jan 14, 2008, at 4:34 , Pierre wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 2:58 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Voting to achieve what?
Fair decisions in a simpler, effective and right manner (and not
discutable, ideally).
I do not consider "fairness", whatever that could mean, having
an
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:45:25 +0100, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>>
>>> On 10.01.2008 18:33, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Gregory Beaver wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 15, 2008 8:12 AM, Ronald Chmara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> >>> Voting to achieve what?
> >> Fair decisions in a simpler, effective and right manner (and not
> >> discutable, ideally).
> >
> > I do not consider "fairness", whate
On Jan 15, 2008, at 02:12:50, Ronald Chmara wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Voting to achieve what?
Fair decisions in a simpler, effective and right manner (and not
discutable, ideally).
I do not consider "fairness", whatever that could mean, having
anything
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Ronald Chmara wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> >>> Voting to achieve what?
> >>
> >> Fair decisions in a simpler, effective and right manner (and not
> >> discutable, ideally).
> >
> > I do not consider "fairness", whatever that could mea
13 matches
Mail list logo