[Taking this back on-list, as it's my final answer.]
On Wed, February 14, 2007 5:30 pm, Christian Schneider wrote:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
>> But the code that checks for E_NOTICE also has to be altered to check
>> for E_STRICT...
>
> How many applications use error handlers. And how many of them r
I'm +1 on the separate block.
SUGGESTIONS:
Put the STABLE RELEASE link *before* any RC release.
Rationale: Users in a hurry will more likely click the first one.
Add an EXTRA page in between the homepage and download of RC saying
something not unlike:
You are downloading a RELEASE CANDIDATE.
Hi
On 2/15/07, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 02/15/2007 05:38 PM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Now that the conference ads are gone, I think we should add release
candidates announcements to the first page of php.net.
> This will add some more attention to the RCs and (I
On 02/15/2007 05:38 PM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
Hello all.
Now that the conference ads are gone, I think we should add release candidates
announcements to the first page of php.net.
This will add some more attention to the RCs and (I hope) will help users to
help us in making the releases more st
Hi Stanislav
On 2/15/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
Does anybody know how to build IMAP module successfully on WIndows? I
Not that I have any idea, but check out ext/imap/IMAP_Win32_HOWTO.txt
-Hannes
try to build it and I get this:
cclient.lib(os_w2k.obj) : error LN
IIRC, you need to modify the Makefile.w2k in c-client. Change the Link
flag /MT to /MD, rebuild imap and rebuild php_imap.dll
I took cclient.lib from win32build.zip library package from php.net. So
I guess this package has to be fixed? I don't know who built it though...
--
Stanislav Malyshev
Hi Stanislav,
IIRC, you need to modify the Makefile.w2k in c-client. Change the Link
flag /MT to /MD, rebuild imap and rebuild php_imap.dll
- Frank
> Hi!
>
> Does anybody know how to build IMAP module successfully on WIndows? I
> try to build it and I get this:
>
> cclient.lib(os_w2k.obj) : e
Hi!
Does anybody know how to build IMAP module successfully on WIndows? I
try to build it and I get this:
cclient.lib(os_w2k.obj) : error LNK2005: _flock already defined in
flock_compat.obj
cclient.lib(os_w2k.obj) : error LNK2005: _openlog already defined in
wsyslog.obj
cclient.lib(os_w2k.ob
Mathias Bank wrote:
> If you use tiny_html
> (http://de2.php.net/manual/en/function.tidy-repair-string.php), you have
> to use "utf8" to encode your data in utf-8.
>
> If you use html_entity_decode()
> (http://de2.php.net/manual/en/function.html-entity-decode.php), you have
> to use "UTF-8".
>
>
On 2/15/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to be clear: does this implement runtime JIT per-element or for
the whole array at once?
The whole array. It is exactly like what we have now for the compile-time JIT.
--Pierre
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
Antony Dovgal wrote:
> Now that the conference ads are gone, I think we should add release
> candidates announcements to the first page of php.net.
> Any objections? I hope none.
I actually think this is a pretty good idea, and thanks to Hannes for the
cleanup.
--
Michael
--
PHP Internals -
Just to be clear: does this implement runtime JIT per-element or for
the whole array at once?
-Andrei
On Feb 14, 2007, at 4:07 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
The patch is attached.
To use runtime JIT you will need to change zend_register_auto_global()
to
zend_register_auto_global_ex() with "1" as
On 02/15/2007 07:42 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
On 02/15/2007 07:22 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Hi Tony,
We've been here before. Last time it got taken off again because it led
to user confusion. People didn't seem to know the difference between a
release candidate and a full release; "It was official, it
On 02/15/2007 07:22 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Hi Tony,
We've been here before. Last time it got taken off again because it led
to user confusion. People didn't seem to know the difference between a
release candidate and a full release; "It was official, it was on
php.net."
.. it was explained th
On 02/15/2007 07:22 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Hi Tony,
We've been here before. Last time it got taken off again because it led to
user confusion. People didn't seem to know the difference between a release
candidate and a full release; "It was official, it was on php.net."
.. it was explained tha
Hi Tony,
We've been here before. Last time it got taken off again because it led to
user confusion. People didn't seem to know the difference between a release
candidate and a full release; "It was official, it was on php.net."
Please can it be made VERY clear, both in the announcements and o
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
> probably, here should be a block on the main page:
>
> Latest testing release: X.X.XRC1 (changelog)
> Latest stable release: X.X.X (changelog)
>
> and "testing release" should just disappear when there are no release
> candidates available
That so
On 02/15/2007 06:49 PM, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
probably, here should be a block on the main page:
Latest testing release: X.X.XRC1 (changelog)
Latest stable release: X.X.X (changelog)
and "testing release" should just disappear when there are no release
candidates available
Yeah, I would mi
probably, here should be a block on the main page:
Latest testing release: X.X.XRC1 (changelog)
Latest stable release: X.X.X (changelog)
and "testing release" should just disappear when there are no release
candidates available
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscr
On 2/15/07, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 02/15/2007 06:24 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> I think it makes sense for RC1 and few of the first level releases
> but not the very closely spaces RC4+ where there are virtually no
> changes between the releases.
I believe it doesn't matte
Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 02/15/2007 06:24 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
I think it makes sense for RC1 and few of the first level releases
but not the very closely spaces RC4+ where there are virtually no
changes between the releases.
I believe it doesn't matter which RC is that, it helps to d
On 02/15/2007 06:24 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
I think it makes sense for RC1 and few of the first level releases
but not the very closely spaces RC4+ where there are virtually no
changes between the releases.
I believe it doesn't matter which RC is that, it helps to detect problems on
the
I think it makes sense for RC1 and few of the first level releases
but not the very closely spaces RC4+ where there are virtually no
changes between the releases.
On 15-Feb-07, at 9:38 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
Hello all.
Now that the conference ads are gone, I think we should add release
Hello all.
Now that the conference ads are gone, I think we should add release candidates
announcements to the first page of php.net.
This will add some more attention to the RCs and (I hope) will help users to
help us in making the releases more stable.
Any objections? I hope none.
--
Wbr,
A
Hi Dmitry!
On 2/14/07, Dmitry Stogov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The patch is attached.
To use runtime JIT you will need to change zend_register_auto_global() to
zend_register_auto_global_ex() with "1" as the last argument. Compile-time
JIT is still supported too.
Note that the significant part
25 matches
Mail list logo
