On 1/29/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, January 27, 2007 5:16 am, Pierre wrote:
> On 1/27/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Good luck trying to retrain millions of programmers to use a CGI
>> object or a function to retrieve GPC values.
>
> You will be surpris
On Sat, January 27, 2007 5:16 am, Pierre wrote:
> On 1/27/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Good luck trying to retrain millions of programmers to use a CGI
>> object or a function to retrieve GPC values.
>
> You will be surprised, really :)
I doubt it.
We haven't even gotten ever
On 1/29/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh! It was not a +1 from me for this patch, I still prefer my simpler
> solution (which has to be written ;). However, as a temporary/test
> code Sara's patch can do it for now no?
What's the reason to commit "temporary test code" to CV
Oh! It was not a +1 from me for this patch, I still prefer my simpler
solution (which has to be written ;). However, as a temporary/test
code Sara's patch can do it for now no?
What's the reason to commit "temporary test code" to CVS? If one wants
to play with it, one can always apply a patch.
Dear,
I'm polish translator of PHP documentation (nick: joeaccord, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://doc.php.net/php/pl/revcheck.php?p=translators ) and I would like to get
access to
CVS-write Karma account because I want to place my files.
At the moment I have to waiting for somebody to put my files on
And I've been trying to get us all to talk about this specific area for
a few months now. Incredibly frustrating. At least now we're getting to
what people _don't_ like..
-A
On Jan 27, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Thanks Sara for the additional insight. Give me a few days to look
in
Why won't it be easy? I think our goal should be make it as transparent
as possible, and so far we've been doing a good job of it, IMHO.
-A
On Jan 29, 2007, at 12:16 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
+1
I like this solution and I don't think that BC break is important for
many
applications.
Not a l
i wish to work on turkish documantation translations
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
strong -1.
On 1/29/07, Dmitry Stogov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
I like this solution and I don't think that BC break is important for many
applications.
I disagree:
$d = $_GET;
$f->do($d);
class foo {
function do(array $d) {}
or
function do($d) {
if (!is_array())...
}
}
or a simple
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> +1
>
> I like this solution and I don't think that BC break is important for many
> applications.
> Not a lot of them use is_array($GET), and I believe no one use
> is_object($_GET).
> $get = $_GET may be a problem, but moving from PHP5 to PHP6 won't easy in
> any case.
a c
PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (627 total including feature requests)
===[Apache2 related]==
38670 Open Whole 4.4.x branch has problem with open_basedir option nested
from Apache2
38915 Open
PHP 5 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (621 total including feature requests)
===[*Compile Issues]==
39372 Suspended Incompatibility in the PHP API.
===[*Configur
Personally, I try to follow commits on
php.cvs, bug reports, Change Log,
user notes on the online manual..
but I still have the feeling of missing
a lot of changes. After a year away from
the project, I have _no_ clue what was
added, when, and whether it was added
to our documentation or not.
+1
I like this solution and I don't think that BC break is important for many
applications.
Not a lot of them use is_array($GET), and I believe no one use
is_object($_GET).
$get = $_GET may be a problem, but moving from PHP5 to PHP6 won't easy in
any case.
Dmitry.
> -Original Message-
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
