On Tue, January 16, 2007 7:07 pm, Sara Golemon wrote:
> allow_url_fopen and allow_url_include continue to accept boolean flags
> in order to behave just as they do now: true/on allows anything,
> false/off allows only those wrappers without the is_url bit set.
+1, fwiw.
As far as the "user" bei
Robert Cummings wrote:
Sounds like PHP should have been trademarked [...]
i don't know about the rest of the world, but here in .de you won't
get a trademark on a 3 letter name anymore, and this has been so
for quite a while, afaict since far before PHP came to light ...
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe,
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 10:27 +1100, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Alain Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:08:16AM +1100, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >
> >> From a bigger perspective, the reason we prefer people to not use the
> >> PHP name for their projects, especially modified versions of PHP
Alain Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:08:16AM +1100, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
>> From a bigger perspective, the reason we prefer people to not use the
>> PHP name for their projects, especially modified versions of PHP itself,
>> is that in the extreme case we want to avoid someone rel
On 21-Jan-07, at 6:12 PM, Alain Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:08:16AM +1100, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
From a bigger perspective, the reason we prefer people to not use the
PHP name for their projects, especially modified versions of PHP
itself,
is that in the extreme case we want
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:08:16AM +1100, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> From a bigger perspective, the reason we prefer people to not use the
> PHP name for their projects, especially modified versions of PHP itself,
> is that in the extreme case we want to avoid someone releasing PHP 7 on
> us. That w
Paul Reinheimer wrote:
> I think it's rather extreme to be directing any animosity towards
> Chris Shiflett on this particular issue, since while he leads that
> group, he isn't the lead for that project. I would also not that to
> the best of my knowledge (being on that team) that no one has
> att
I know that the 'TSRMLS' is an abbreviation of 'Thread Safe Resource Manager
Local Storage', but what means is 'CC' and 'DC' in the 'TSRMLS_CC' and
'TSRMLS_DC' ?
This has been asked multiple times before on this list, but once again:
_CC - call with comma
_C - call (without comma)
_DC - dec
abdelmalek65
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 04:11 +0800, yAnbiN wrote:
>> Hi!
>> I know that the 'TSRMLS' is an abbreviation of 'Thread Safe Resource Manager
>> Local Storage', but what means is 'CC' and 'DC' in the 'TSRMLS_CC' and
>> 'TSRMLS_DC' ?
>
> This has been asked multiple
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 04:11 +0800, yAnbiN wrote:
> Hi!
> I know that the 'TSRMLS' is an abbreviation of 'Thread Safe Resource Manager
> Local Storage', but what means is 'CC' and 'DC' in the 'TSRMLS_CC' and
> 'TSRMLS_DC' ?
This has been asked multiple times before on this list, but once ag
Hi!
I know that the 'TSRMLS' is an abbreviation of 'Thread Safe Resource Manager
Local Storage', but what means is 'CC' and 'DC' in the 'TSRMLS_CC' and
'TSRMLS_DC' ?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I think it's rather extreme to be directing any animosity towards
Chris Shiflett on this particular issue, since while he leads that
group, he isn't the lead for that project. I would also not that to
the best of my knowledge (being on that team) that no one has
attempted to bring it up with the p
On 21 jan 2007 Lars Schultz wrote:
> >Perhaps you could use your own reference counting?
> >Keep your "real" objects in private array and instead of returning them
> > return a simple object which would forward all methods and properties by
> > __get/__set/__call. The constructor would increase you
Andreas Korthaus wrote:
Some time ago I created a patch to implement a ref_count() function
which works the way you suggested. But I'm not sure if it's
OK/complete... and I'm not sure if something like that is really
needed in the core (and I'm definetly not the person to decide on that
;-)).
Note that the engine does not guarantee you any particular value of
the refcount. Passing parameters around, accessing variables, etc. may
change the refcount. One thing the engine guarantees you is that once
no links to the variable exist it would be destroyed (which may not
happen immediate
Perhaps you could use your own reference counting?
Keep your "real" objects in private array and instead of returning them return
a simple object which would forward all methods and properties by
__get/__set/__call. The constructor would increase your internal refcount by
one, destructor woul
We don't use cvs over ssl, just plain pserver auth.
If you forgot your password, you can modify it at
http://master.php.net/forgot.php
Nuno
- Original Message -
Hi, all,
Sorry for disturbing you.
I cant login in my account "mikespook" with the passwords that I set up
before.
I d
Hi, all,
Sorry for disturbing you.
I cant login in my account "mikespook" with the passwords that I set up before.
I dont know if I type a wrong passwords or I need more setup with the
cvs client as SSL etc.
Another problem is how I can modify my password with the cvs account.
Thanks and Regar
19 matches
Mail list logo
