Antony Dovgal wrote:
I tend to disagree with you here, Edin.
Releasing one RC just after another - _that_ would be bad management.
RCs are RCs, if something is broken in one of them, let's wait for the
next one and see if it ok.
Also, I don't like the rush in the release management which to a
On 10/08/2006 04:26 AM, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no
point in waiting for another week for it just because we have to
release things on Thursday.
I think that the best thing would be to
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no
point in waiting for another week for it just because we have to
release things on Thursday.
I think that the best thing would be to make immediate RC6 and allow
people some time t
On 10/7/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RC6 will be out on Thursday to give people a chance to identify any
remaining issues with the current state of 5.2.0 as well as allow
existing bug reporters to confirm the critical issues outlined have
been resolved.
If you are referring t
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
The vote is should OO strictness (fatal error on changing function
arguments in derived classes in this case) be removed or kept.
I think fatal error should be definitely removed or the rules be at
least relaxed sufficie
