On 17-Sep-06, at 8:03 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
OK, first patch to fix the 'tests/lang/bug35176.phpt' specific
problem: http://mega.ist.utl.pt/~ncpl/zend_include_memleak.txt
There might be other issues with virtual_file_ex() that I haven't
fully tested.
Can you not simply add the free before
Hello,
On 9/17/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 17-Sep-06, at 12:05 PM, Michael Wallner wrote:
> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>
>> These looks good. The only other suggestion is to explore the
>> option of
>> renaming filter_get_args() to filter_get_variable() so it is a bit
>> mo
On 17-Sep-06, at 12:05 PM, Michael Wallner wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
These looks good. The only other suggestion is to explore the
option of
renaming filter_get_args() to filter_get_variable() so it is a bit
more
consistent with filter_has_variable().
What about filter_get_var() an
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> These looks good. The only other suggestion is to explore the option of
> renaming filter_get_args() to filter_get_variable() so it is a bit more
> consistent with filter_has_variable().
What about filter_get_var() and filter_has_var()?
--
Michael
--
PHP Internals -
On 16-Sep-06, at 9:27 PM, Pierre wrote:
Hello,
On 9/17/06, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep I agree. I thought the idea was to go to filter_* which has
been our
standard for extensions.
I'm sure we can find good names for the functions in this way.
old name > new name:
input_g
On 16/09/06, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
On 9/17/06, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep I agree. I thought the idea was to go to filter_* which has been our
> standard for extensions.
> I'm sure we can find good names for the functions in this way.
old name > new name:
OK, first patch to fix the 'tests/lang/bug35176.phpt' specific problem:
http://mega.ist.utl.pt/~ncpl/zend_include_memleak.txt
There might be other issues with virtual_file_ex() that I haven't fully
tested.
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: "Nuno Lopes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PHPdev"
At 04:27 17/09/2006, Pierre wrote:
Hello,
On 9/17/06, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep I agree. I thought the idea was to go to filter_* which has been our
standard for extensions.
I'm sure we can find good names for the functions in this way.
old name > new name:
input_get
