The new memory manager actually wastes less memory than the old one, scales
better and most important to this discussion, the memory consumption is far
more accurate as it also takes into account the memory manager overhead.
Therefore, we are not consuming 1.5x memory, but we are reporting a more
a
PHP 5.2 and PHP 4.4 use the same default memory limit - 8M, but near each
internal structure in php 5.2 is bigger (zval, zend_class_entry,
zend_op_array, zend_opcode, ...).this is one of the reasin to incrise
default memory limit.
The second reason is new memory manager that uses sliht different s
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Esser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 4:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] increase the default memory limit in 5.2.0+
>
>
> Hello,
> > After having tested 5.2 and the new
to release XXTEA PECL extension.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Esser"
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006
> Hello,
> > After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
> > weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory usage. As
> > a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memory l
Hello,
On 8/16/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 16-Aug-06, at 6:30 AM, Pierre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
> weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory
> usage. As
> a side effect, many applications r
On 16-Aug-06, at 6:30 AM, Pierre wrote:
Hello,
After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory
usage. As
a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memory limit. It can be
a problem.
Is this caused by the
Hello,
> After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
> weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory usage. As
> a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memory limit. It can be
> a problem.
>
> A good example is to compare the usage of a pear/pecl comman
Hi Pierre,
After checking places where is_numeric... functions are used
(http://lxr.php.net/ident?i=is_numeric_string), it looks like changing to
allow *trailing* spaces would have an impact in zend_operators.c for at
least compare_function() (and I guess increment_function() too). e.g. ('1'
== '
Hello,
On 8/16/06, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Pierre wrote:
> I would suggest to increase the default 8M to 12M. I discussed this
> issue with Dmitry and he agrees on the principle. Any other opinions?
> Or is it fine to increase it?
I actually thought we in
Hello,
On 8/16/06, bertrand Gugger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On 16.08.2006 15:13, bertrand Gugger wrote:
>
>> Bonjour,
>> Pierre wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
>>> weeks, I notice a significant increase of t
I would suggest to increase the default 8M to 12M. I discussed this
issue with Dmitry and he agrees on the principle. Any other opinions?
Or is it fine to increase it?
Could we not increase it to 16MB? Almost every server I have used has
changes the php.ini from 8MB to 16MB anyway.
Regards
Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 16.08.2006 15:13, bertrand Gugger wrote:
Bonjour,
Pierre wrote:
Hello,
After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory usage. As
a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memory limit
On 16.08.2006 15:13, bertrand Gugger wrote:
Bonjour,
Pierre wrote:
Hello,
After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory usage. As
a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memory limit. It can be
a problem.
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Pierre wrote:
> I would suggest to increase the default 8M to 12M. I discussed this
> issue with Dmitry and he agrees on the principle. Any other opinions?
> Or is it fine to increase it?
I actually thought we increased it to 16M already... but apparently not.
regards,
Deri
Bonjour,
Pierre wrote:
Hello,
After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory usage. As
a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memory limit. It can be
a problem.
A good example is to compare the usage of a p
Hello,
After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory usage. As
a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memory limit. It can be
a problem.
A good example is to compare the usage of a pear/pecl command between
Hello Matt,
> Which part of "We need to sit down and come up with a proposal?" did
> you not understand? seriously?
Nothing. :-) But the patch is all I know of, so that was my proposal.
Maybe with the "sitting down," "if" to change this function would be the
decision, but not "what" to change,
Hi Pierre,
- Original Message -
From: "Pierre"
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006
> Hello Matt,
>
> > > Which part of "We need to sit down and come up with a proposal?" did
> > > you not understand? seriously?
> >
> > Nothing. :-) But the patch is all I know of, so that was my proposal.
>
Hi Pierre,
- Original Message -
From: "Pierre"
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006
> Hello,
>
> On 8/15/06, Matt W wrote:
> > Hi Pierre,
> >
> > I will go ahead and enter a Bug report for this in a bit ('cause there's
> > definitely a bug), just so it's in the official place (preferred, I
gue
20 matches
Mail list logo
