> Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I think it's a nice idea but I doubt it's very useful at this point. It
> doesn't seem to significantly affect performance, which is ...
I concur.
Instead of guessing branch probabilities, why not measure them?
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.1/gcc/Optimize-Options
On 6/18/06, Elmar Pitschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To manage my pear package. Here is the link to the proposal:
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-votes-show.php?id=386
Confirmed. Can anyone create this accout? Thanks.
I'll take care of the karma.
--Pierre
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Devel
I think it's a nice idea but I doubt it's very useful at this point. It
doesn't seem to significantly affect performance, which is inline with some
tests that we have done in the past, where it's really the hardware
management of branch prediction and cache size which affect this. I doubt
that make
For PHP Development
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:07:54 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pierre) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering when 4.4.3 is planed?
>
> I have some a pending PEAR release (1.4.10) which fixes many
> open_basedir issues. It is not critical as people can always update
> later but it would be nice to get it in.
>
Definitely looks nice. I actually like how it makes the code more
readable hinting which branches are rare.
Zeev
At 16:49 18/06/2006, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I was playing with branch prediction in the Zend VM
executor. Although I didn't have any noticeable performance
improveme
