> The PHP soap implementation is very fast by the way ... my benchmarks
> indicated 3-4ms request times on the LAN (without doing anything useful
> inside the request). This compares to over 30ms for the
> mod_perl/Soap::Lite implementation (and I haven't tested Java or .Net)
Can you provide code
steve wrote:
Personally, I wouldn't mind connection pooling too. I like to dream...
And where would such a pool live?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Taking over as maintainer of pear/Config
see this thread on pear-qa: http://beeblex.com/lists/index.php/php.pear.qa/3335
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
The problem isn't the duration of the soap query call, it's how long
to wait before giving up on establishing the connection. The connect
timeout is completely independent from the soap call duration or the
work that it performs.
--Wez.
On 12/21/05, steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's n
On 12/21/05, Andreas Schiffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >There's not much difference between .25 and 1 second.
> Ah, this may be so for the traditional use of webservices. But for
> eCommerce applications for example speed is king and its also very
> important to provide consistent speeds (i.e.
> There's not much difference between .25 and 1 second.
Actually, there is. It depends on the length of time of a typical page
request (and the proportion of the delay to the typical time), and the
hardware setup to handle that. The 4x slowdown can cause a cascade
effect as it might cause more tha
Ok, could we get connected with the museum maintainer? It would be nice
to know "once and for all" :) who can we contact. I also tried to push
the removal of the patch files from the CVS server (with cvs remove not
on the machine). So the point is not to wipe them completely, but to get
off some un
Wez,
There's not much difference between .25 and 1 second.
Ah, this may be so for the traditional use of webservices. But for
eCommerce applications for example speed is king and its also very
important to provide consistent speeds (i.e. not hang). I don't have
published reference links on
There's not much difference between .25 and 1 second.
If you're talking soap on each page render, you're probably doing
something wrong anyway; you should have some kind of cache in your web
app.
That's not to say that we won't fix this issue, but we're not in a
rush to do so.
If you're feeling mo
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:06:13 +0100
Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 03:56:06 -0500
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael B Allen) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 01:58:41 -0500
> > Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Just curious, why aren't you writing this as an apa
Marian Kostadinov wrote:
Hello everyone,
I wonder why is nobody keeping track of the snaps.php.net win snapshots?:)
We're so lucky to have you check it for us :)
The last one is built successfully 3 days ago!
Unfortunately, it is not the first time when there is no snap for more than
two days
Marian Kostadinov wrote:
Hello everyone,
I wonder why is nobody keeping track of the snaps.php.net win snapshots?:)
The last one is built successfully 3 days ago!
Unfortunately, it is not the first time when there is no snap for more than
two days.
I just had a quick look at the snapshot log (
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:27:39 +0200 (EET)
Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So you're duplicating the ldap extension? :)
Yeah, you might be able to do it that way. But considering the Kerberos
ticket has the SIDs and LDAP would have to perform group expansion each
time I think a D
Hello everyone,
I wonder why is nobody keeping track of the snaps.php.net win snapshots?:)
The last one is built successfully 3 days ago!
Unfortunately, it is not the first time when there is no snap for more than
two days.
Hi all,
I am new to php source code hacking, but got into it for a particular
reason: I need sub-second SOAP request timeouts.
To qualify the reasoning behind this sub-second timeout requirement a
bit further, let me explain what it is used for: We are implementing a
system that changes webc
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 03:56:06 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael B Allen) wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 01:58:41 -0500
> Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just curious, why aren't you writing this as an apache module?
> >
> > Is this of any use; it seems a bit dated, but could save you so
So you're duplicating the ldap extension? :)
--Jani
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 01:58:41 -0500
Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just curious, why aren't you writing this as an apache module?
Is this of any use; it seems a bit dated, but co
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 01:58:41 -0500
Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just curious, why aren't you writing this as an apache module?
>
> Is this of any use; it seems a bit dated, but could save you some effort:
> http://meta.cesnet.cz/cms/opencms/en/docs/software/devel/negotiate.html
Well
18 matches
Mail list logo
