Joseph Crawford wrote:
i would highly agree with this, protection of source is a great benefit,
also the performance would be much better.
It's not really going to protect the source that much (certinally not
out of the box) as anybody would be free to grab the php source, look at
how the z
i would highly agree with this, protection of source is a great benefit,
also the performance would be much better.
--
Joseph Crawford Jr.
Zend Certified Engineer
Codebowl Solutions, Inc.
1-802-671-2021
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PHP6 is about to make OPCode caching mechanism build into Zend Engine,
without question this will improve
PHP dramatically.But I have a radical thought: why not to directly run
ZIC(Zend Intermediate Code) files that have been compiled instead of
handling PHP source scripts. Just like a execrutab
jani,
what are you talking about?
--
Joseph Crawford Jr.
Zend Certified Engineer
Codebowl Solutions, Inc.
1-802-671-2021
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
I undestood the problem.
You run PHP without PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN, so PHP doesn't spawn additional
processes (old php version spawned 8 processes by default).
I fixed the bug in proper way in CVS HEAD, PHP_5_1 and PHP_5_0.
Confirmed!
Thanks a lot,
--
Michael - http://dev.iw
Would you mind explaining that "indirect property accessing" method,
Andi? Or did you mean avoiding circular references altogether by
having a third "intermediate" layer that would return the respective
object when handed a GUID or something, so that effectively, one of
the partners in the
regarding the actually topic of this thread I'm very interested
in the concept of 'weak references' (as Apple seems to call them),
what '$this->this' is all about, and whether using reference notation
with object variable assignment is even allowed, whether it it makes
a difference and what the fu
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Sorry about that. I think it might be a problem with the server not my
client.
If it persists please let me know.
given what your work has done for me I can't consider it a
problem :-) just thought it was kinda funny.
regarding the actually topic of this thread I'm very in
Sorry about that. I think it might be a problem with the server not my client.
If it persists please let me know.
At 08:37 AM 12/9/2005, Jochem Maas wrote:
Andi - your email client seems to be leaking :-)
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi Alan,
Generally speaking, if you create a circular reference (whet
I undestood the problem.
You run PHP without PHP_FCGI_CHILDREN, so PHP doesn't spawn additional
processes (old php version spawned 8 processes by default).
I fixed the bug in proper way in CVS HEAD, PHP_5_1 and PHP_5_0.
Thanks. Dmitry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Wallner [mailto
Andi - your email client seems to be leaking :-)
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi Alan,
Generally speaking, if you create a circular reference (whether by
reference or by value), then you will have a "memory leak" until the end
of the request. This is not only true for objects (and circular
references
Hi Dmitry Stogov, you wrote:
> Sorry. What do you like to commit?
> flush() works without any patches for me.
Well, sorry too then. Seems that we misunderstood each other.
I don't know anything about ZendStuff, but PHP fcgi won't flush
without that patch.
Regards,
--
Michael - http://dev.iwor
1 (one) email about this would have been enough. No more spam please! :)
--Jani
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
You can also check out my book: http://tinyurl.com/7aect It's a free download.
It has one chapter of the basics for PHP extension writing. It might not
answer all
Sorry. What do you like to commit?
flush() works without any patches for me.
Thanks. Dmitry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Wallner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 4:13 PM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] bug #34429 - Output
On 12/9/05, Alan Pinstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, my question, which still remains unanswered, is that I've
> found a way that "seems" to create a weak reference and I'm simply
> asking if what I am doing is condoned or just lucky (and thus a bad
> idea that will probably break in the
Hi Dmitry Stogov, you wrote:
> So the problem in mod_fcgi or Apache configuration.
> I made tests with ZendEnabler and it works (It is available as part of
> ZendCore).
>
Hi Dmitry,
in my case it was mod_deflate buffering the data, disabling it
worked here well too. Commit then? :)
Thanks,
--
So the problem in mod_fcgi or Apache configuration.
I made tests with ZendEnabler and it works (It is available as part of
ZendCore).
Thanks. Dmitry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Wallner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 1:10 PM
> To: internals@lists.php
lol so now i find out it's a free download i bought that book not long ago i
like print better anyway ;)
--
Joseph Crawford Jr.
Zend Certified Engineer
Codebowl Solutions, Inc.
1-802-671-2021
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ilya M. Slepnev, you wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> What about adding "if (request) " at the beginning of the
> "flush_result = FCGX_FFlush(request->out);" string? You see, you have
> to do that call, because else you are not flushing at all in fastcgi
> mode at all!-)
Yes, it now makes fcgi flush it
19 matches
Mail list logo
