Simon Kissane wrote:
> Bug #14923 concerns PHP's is_writable, etc., functions & POSIX ACLs.
> Likewise, Bug #30931 concerns the same thing.
This bug has been fixed in CVS as pointed by Bug #34957.
So Bugs #14923, #30931 and #34957 are all finally closed, thanks to Wez.
Regards,
Cristiano Duarte
Ron Korving wrote:
> That would be nice. If all memory, even the stuff allocated by functions,
> is freed at the end of the request, I can see where the problem is. It
> would be very useful if this memory really would be freed at the moment
> all references to it disappear. This would be a lot bet
Hello Nuno,
Saturday, October 22, 2005, 2:01:31 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Marcus.
> Thanks for reviewing the patch!
> I agree with you that using environment vars is excessive in this script.
> The only reason I've used it is to allow the user to pass arguments to
> valgrind (like the suppresions fi
On 23.10.2005 22:43, techtonik wrote:
I might be compenent, but it was a waste of time. I'm not an OOP
programmer and I don't like PHP 5 yet.
I could never understand people saying that PHP5 is about OOP.
It's like saying that kernel 2.6 is about desktop.
True, PHP5 has improved OO support, bu
||*()*||[\..konnichi wa, ogenki desu ka, Wez../]
>> Is there any developers who officially supports PHP 4 branch?
WF> Yes, we "support" people using it, but not so much people building it.
WF> We're trying to shift people on to PHP 5 so that the support burden
WF> is lessened. If you're bui
