[Resending with patch inline]
Hi--
Could someone with karma check that this patch is ok for bug #34565 and
commit it to CVS? The patch is against HEAD -- not sure if a separate commit
needs to be made against the 4.x and 5.x branches (and would appreciate some
pointers on this topic).
Cheers!
[Resending with patch in text file. I'm planning on getting this right one
of these days]
Hi--
Could someone with karma check that this patch is ok for bug #34565 and
commit it to CVS? The patch is against HEAD -- not sure if a separate commit
needs to be made against the 4.x and 5.x branches (an
Hi--
Could someone with karma check that this patch is ok for bug #34565 and
commit it to CVS? The patch is against HEAD -- not sure if a separate commit
needs to be made against the 4.x and 5.x branches (and would appreciate some
pointers on this topic).
Cheers!
Marco
--
PHP Internals - PHP
Hello Jani,
Tuesday, September 20, 2005, 11:19:28 AM, you wrote:
> No way.
Yep no way! PHP doesn't offer a '...' signature so we need it the way it is.
And i don't think we want to have those '...' signatures.
marcus
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Nuno Lopes wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Although this
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although this is not as hot as references or Unicode stuff, I would like to
> discuss a new topic.
> Currently PHP accepts more parameters to a function than the required.
> In English:
> function a($b) {}
> a(1,2,3);
> ?>
>
> PHP accepts this an
No way.
--Jani
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hi,
Although this is not as hot as references or Unicode stuff, I would like to
discuss a new topic.
Currently PHP accepts more parameters to a function than the required.
In English:
PHP accepts this and generates no errors
