RE: [PHP-DEV] php 4.4 BC break

2005-07-16 Thread David Zülke
error_reporting/display_errors should be disabled on production environments anyway, so where's the problem. And on dev machines, people will finally realize they did something stupid. It's up to them to fix it or not to fix it. - David > -Original Message- > From: Ron Korving [mailto:[E

Fw: [PHP-DEV] Win9x support in PHP

2005-07-16 Thread Steph
erm, for 1993 please read 2003 :-) - Original Message - From: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "PHPdev" Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 1:57 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Win9x support in PHP > My 2p: > > I used to buil

Re: [PHP-DEV] Win9x support in PHP

2005-07-16 Thread Steph
My 2p: I used to build regularly on Win98 until last summer, and supplied fixes for a couple of platform-specific PHP bugs and build issues up until that point. Nobody else on the internals circuit had access to Win98 then, and nobody's actively supported it since I stopped. The test suite has ne

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 4.4 BC break

2005-07-16 Thread Ron Korving
I wonder how friendly they will find this notice showing up :) (I know most of the people out there won't have PHP set up to show notices, but what counts for most people, doesn't automatically count for all people) "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 4.4 BC break

2005-07-16 Thread Derick Rethans
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Ron Korving wrote: > It doesn't matter how wrong the programmers were by abusing PHP in this way. > You have to feel sympathy for the fact that these people will be upgrading > their servers only to find out their code stops working. It doesn't "stop working", you just get a

Re: [PHP-DEV] php 4.4 BC break

2005-07-16 Thread Ron Korving
> >Lastly, there IS a note in the announcement stating that the major version > >increase is due to a non-BC change, I don't see what everyone is > >complaining about. Perhaps you should request that your users read what > >they're downloading before they download it. > > Wrong, read the announceme