At 03:28 PM 4/27/2005 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 20:12 25/04/2005, Christian Schneider wrote:
[snip]
But then again I think the whole thing is typical OO bloat anyway and
that's why I don't want to have language features added for it (-:C
I wholeheartedly agree.
So do I. If you really need such
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Wez Furlong wrote:
> On 4/25/05, Lukas Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I also noticed that bindParam() and bindColumn() are 1-indexed, which
> > will raise inconviniences with people using arrays for example to stored
> > the numeric indexes
>
> Passing an array with num
Wez Furlong wrote:
How about sitting down together at php|tropics
Sure.
and simply going through each of the methods one by one.
Looking at what kind of methods names we currently are using for the
same or similar things in any of the current projects on php.net and
make any adjustments then?
Ma
At 17:44 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
Hmm. As I mentioned to Christian in a private email, I have a system which is
350K LOC. Now not all of that gets loaded at one time of course (thank God
for __autoload()!), but there are times when a significant proportion of it
is loaded. And then it mun
Hi,
Duncan McIntyre wrote:
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 2:19 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 16:58 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
I remember similar arguments being made about most of the new OO features
in PHP5.
Out of interest, how is this more bloated than storing doc comments in
memory?
It's feat
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2005 2:19 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> > At 16:58 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
> > >I remember similar arguments being made about most of the new OO features
> > >in PHP5.
> > >
> > >Out of interest, how is this more bloated th
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 2:19 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 16:58 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
> >I remember similar arguments being made about most of the new OO features
> >in PHP5.
> >
> >Out of interest, how is this more bloated than storing doc comments in
> > memory?
>
> It's feature b
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 2:19 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 16:58 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
> >I remember similar arguments being made about most of the new OO features
> >in PHP5.
> >
> >Out of interest, how is this more bloated than storing doc comments in
> > memory?
>
> It's feature b
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I'm not too thrilled about this deal. I don't think I'd be in favour of
> accepting this attributes patch regardless of just about anything else. Not
> sure how others feel about it, but at least in my opinion, this feature is a
> clear 'no no' for PHP.
At 16:58 27/04/2005, Duncan McIntyre wrote:
I remember similar arguments being made about most of the new OO features
in PHP5.
Out of interest, how is this more bloated than storing doc comments in memory?
It's feature bloat, not memory consumption bloat. Adding obscure operators
is the worst t
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 1:28 pm, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 20:12 25/04/2005, Christian Schneider wrote:
> >[snip]
> >But then again I think the whole thing is typical OO bloat anyway and
> >that's why I don't want to have language features added for it (-:C
>
> I wholeheartedly agree.
>
> Zeev
I
At 11:02 26/04/2005, Sascha Schumann wrote:
They are not helpful for various reasons. e.g. if you need
to ask whether a session was started, your architecture is
broken (a central place needs to manage sessions; that single
place must know whether a session has been started).
Why?
At 20:12 25/04/2005, Christian Schneider wrote:
[snip]
But then again I think the whole thing is typical OO bloat anyway and
that's why I don't want to have language features added for it (-:C
I wholeheartedly agree.
Zeev
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visi
13 matches
Mail list logo
