Daniel J Cain Jr. wrote:
One change adds a PHP function session_is_started() to determine if a
session has already been, well... started. :)
It also adds an optional id parameter to session_regenerate_id()
allowing the user to provide their own id instead of PHP generating a
new one. I'm not i
I recently wrote a new custom session handler in PHP5. In the process
I've made a couple of changes within ext/session/ that I would like to
see in the official PHP distribution.
Please consider the following patches for inclusion into PHP.
One change adds a PHP function session_is_started() to
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:52:25 -0400
Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Antony Dovgal wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:11:46 -0400
> >Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>I just spent quite a while searching the archives, and can't find any
> >>explanat
Johannes Schlueter wrote:
Hi Greg,
Greg Beaver wrote:
Try this code (which worked in 5.0.3)
This was changed since such a change of visibility makes no sense - if you
extend a class it should still be compatible with it's parent class.
I highly recommend removing this restriction for constructor
Hi Greg,
Greg Beaver wrote:
> Try this code (which worked in 5.0.3)
>
> class a { public function __construct(){}}
> class b extends a { protected function __construct(){}}
> ?>
This was changed since such a change of visibility makes no sense - if you
extend a class it should still be compati
Antony Dovgal wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:11:46 -0400
Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I just spent quite a while searching the archives, and can't find any
explanation of why this code worked in 5.0.3 but doesn't in 5.0.4:
class blah {
protected function __construct(){}
}
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:11:46 -0400
Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just spent quite a while searching the archives, and can't find any
> explanation of why this code worked in 5.0.3 but doesn't in 5.0.4:
>
> class blah {
> protected function __construct(){}
> }
> ?>
Hello Greg,
Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 5:11:46 AM, you wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just spent quite a while searching the archives, and can't find any
> explanation of why this code worked in 5.0.3 but doesn't in 5.0.4:
> class blah {
> protected function __construct(){}
> }
?>>
> Could someon
