Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 Beta 1

2005-04-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Well if someone can help me get sqlstate working in pdo_pgsql I'd be happy with a release. At the moment it's just silly that it's not done. However, I'm finding the PDO code a bit of a nightmare so I cannot propagate the sqlstates in all cases... Maybe could I send someone my patch so far? A

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 Beta 1

2005-04-02 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
I'd like to roll PHP 5.1 Beta 1 very soon. Wez, I've been waiting for PDO in order to get this going. Do you feel it's mature enough or should I hold off some more time? Well if someone can help me get sqlstate working in pdo_pgsql I'd be happy with a release. At the moment it's just silly that

[PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 Beta 1

2005-04-02 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hey, I'd like to roll PHP 5.1 Beta 1 very soon. Wez, I've been waiting for PDO in order to get this going. Do you feel it's mature enough or should I hold off some more time? Also, has someone already integrated PDO configure switches with the old --with-db configure switches? (i.e. the idea was

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.0.4 PEAR issue

2005-04-02 Thread Andi Gutmans
Hi James, We never had a fourth digit and I don't think we should introduce one now. Third digit (mini digit) is meant for only bug fix releases. I don't see harm in bumping that up by 1. We've done it in the past. Andi At 08:51 PM 4/1/2005 -0500, James Ellis wrote: Hi I think a 5.0.4.1 would be

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.0.4 PEAR issue

2005-04-02 Thread Andi Gutmans
I'd go for 5.0.5. I'm always wary about re-releasing the same version because then you can't know why someone's having a problem. At 12:00 AM 4/2/2005 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote: Folks, We have a bit of a situation with the PEAR distro that's embedded in 5.0.4. It's missing the RunTest.php file,

Re: [PHP-DEV] pdo: binding variables supplied to execute() is NotVeryUseful(tm)...

2005-04-02 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 10:13 AM 4/1/2005 +0200, Thies C.Arntzen wrote: all those functions expect to bind a to a statement. this should work both with or without a leading colon. by the way (just checked) - this is how the "native" oracle-oci binding functions work. so oracle decided to make the colon in front of

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.0.4 PEAR issue

2005-04-02 Thread Andrey Hristov
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: Derick Rethans wrote: On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Mike Robinson wrote: Would 5.0.4pl1 be inappropriate? Yes, as we decided not to do that anymore and it looks "bad". well, something bad has happened, so what? ;) better than the potential confusion IMHO and AFAIK version_compar

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.0.4 PEAR issue

2005-04-02 Thread Hartmut Holzgraefe
Derick Rethans wrote: On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Mike Robinson wrote: Would 5.0.4pl1 be inappropriate? Yes, as we decided not to do that anymore and it looks "bad". well, something bad has happened, so what? ;) better than the potential confusion IMHO -- Hartmut Holzgraefe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- PHP In

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.0.4 PEAR issue

2005-04-02 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Mike Robinson wrote: > Would 5.0.4pl1 be inappropriate? Yes, as we decided not to do that anymore and it looks "bad". Derick -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.0.4 PEAR issue

2005-04-02 Thread Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, James Ellis wrote: > I think a 5.0.4.1 would be the best way to go (not sure what > versioning to use), as there are no real code changes to justify a > 5.05. You could then provide a patch with notes for those with 5.04 > installed or they could compile 5.0.4.1 Let's just rer