xml_rpc ? :)
btw. What happened to pecl/rpc/* anyhow? :)
--Jani
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Well it's a good question but I'm not sure how we'd call it. XML-RPC is
already taken.
Ideas?
Andi
At 09:11 PM 3/21/2005 +0100, Lukas Smith wrote:
Hi,
I guess xmlprci is following
Well it's a good question but I'm not sure how we'd call it. XML-RPC is
already taken.
Ideas?
Andi
At 09:11 PM 3/21/2005 +0100, Lukas Smith wrote:
Hi,
I guess xmlprci is following the mysqli example. I am not sure if this is
a good idea to have new BC breaking versions of extensions append lette
In the manual, http_build_query's documented behavior is to generate a
"URL-encoded query string." The documentation does not specify what
is used as a separator between the array elements, but testing and/or
source perusal easily show that it is arg_separator.output. This
makes sense when genera
Can you point us to the thread? I can't recall seeing it rejected, and I
can't find the thread either...
Zeev
At 15:37 23/03/2005, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Robert wrote:
> >This was already considered and rejected. No need to start the discussion
> >again.
> >
> All I saw is th
I went over all of the differences between RC1 and the branch's HEAD, and
it appears that there were some substantial fixes with some potential for
breakage that I didn't remember (some of them ran by me, go figure).
Therefore I think it's best if we released RC2 instead, and released the
final
At 17:47 23/03/2005, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Zeev Suraski wrote:
All,
There weren't any major stoppers found in RC1, so we plan to move forward
and release these versions. We'll package them today and announce them
tomorrow.
You mean you're gonna release RC1's as the releas
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > There weren't any major stoppers found in RC1, so we plan to move forward
> > and release these versions. We'll package them today and announce them
> > tomorrow.
>
> You mean you're gonna release RC1
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Zeev Suraski wrote:
All,
There weren't any major stoppers found in RC1, so we plan to move forward and
release these versions. We'll package them today and announce them tomorrow.
You mean you're gonna release RC1's as the releases and not current
CVS There were
All,
There weren't any major stoppers found in RC1, so we plan to move forward
and release these versions. We'll package them today and announce them
tomorrow.
Zeev
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Robert wrote:
> >This was already considered and rejected. No need to start the discussion
> >again.
> >
> All I saw is that the discussion stopped, not that it was rejected.
Then you should look further - it was rejected.
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl |
Hello Edin,
This was already considered and rejected. No need to start the discussion
again.
All I saw is that the discussion stopped, not that it was rejected.
Rob
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
This was already considered and rejected. No need to start the discussion
again.
Edin
- Original Message -
From: "Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "php-dev"
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 10:26 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Upload Progress Meter Patch in 5.04?
> Hello,
>
> would it be po
Hello,
would it be possible to add the patch for 5.04?
(I'm not a C coder, I only know PHP)
I think people would appreciate such an addition to PHP,
Thanks,
Rob
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
13 matches
Mail list logo
