Can you send it as attachment? If you did, then maybe try and gzip it
before you send it. I'll apply it. Is it against all branches?
At 03:38 PM 1/13/2005 +0100, Daniel Lorch wrote:
Hi
It seems that this patch has been overlooked somehow. This is only a
cosmetic patch (but a useful one, I believ
Hi Moriyoshi,
I restored old behavior, so now $str["str"] is eqivalent of $str[0].
Thanks. Dmitry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Moriyoshi Koizumi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 17:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'internals Mailing List Developers'
> Subjec
Hi,
one may use __CLASS__ instead of get_class().
Andrey
Torsten Roehr wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:35 PM
To: Torsten Roehr
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Get name of extending class with
Looking into it. I agree that we shouldn't break BC.
At 05:05 AM 1/13/2005 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
On 2005/01/12, at 18:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
patch for HEAD is incorrect.
You must not edit zend_vm_execute.h directly. You must edit
zend_vm_def.h and then generate zend_vm_ex
Christian Schneider wrote:
Torsten Roehr wrote:
Something so straightforward and fundamental should be possible!?!
Maybe is isn't as fundamental as you think? I never came across this
problem in years of PHP programming. But then again I use classes with
static calls for nothing but separate nam
Hi,
This bug's been open a while (since July). I placed a small patch in the
comments in October (repeated below); can someone review and commit please?
John.
patch to win32 sendmail.c:
--- old.c 2004-09-08 21:33:17.640625000 +0100
+++ new.c 2004-09-08 21:39:06.890625000 +0100
@@ -
Hi
the patch was written against php-4.3.10 (as in "downloaded as .tar.gz from the
website"). Should I retrieve HEAD instead?
Daniel
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Can you send it as attachment? If you did, then maybe try and gzip it
before you send it. I'll apply it. Is it against all branches?
At 03:38
On Monday 10 January 2005 17:58, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Leonardo Pedretti wrote:
> > Are there any plans to include type hinting with basic types and type
> > hinting for variables? (such as optional declaration)
>
> There are no such things planned, except for "array" afaik
Jani,
Can you take a look at this? I see you have touched this extension in the past.
Thanks,
Andi
At 09:52 AM 1/13/2005 -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> Short update:
> Seems there are 2-3 bugs that need attending so I think it'll take a
Dan,
I don't feel very strong about this so I'll leave it up to you guys but
there are almost no code changes so I don't quite understand why it'd be so
terrible for the extension.
Andi
At 06:46 PM 1/12/2005 -0800, Dan Kalowsky wrote:
On Jan 12, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Wez Furlong wrote:
Regardless of
I think HEAD is good enough for PHP 5.
At 09:08 PM 1/12/2005 -0500, Wez Furlong wrote:
I committed the patch to HEAD; I'll leave it to the release masters to
decide if they want it in the next 4.3 and 5 releases.
--Wez.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:03:41 -0500, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re
11 matches
Mail list logo
