On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Lester Caine wrote:
> The Apache2 debate is more interesting. I am just running up a nice new
> AMD64, with SUSE9.1 (no 9.2 disk handy), and the first thing I find -
> and which does not bother me at all - ONLY Apache2 in the distribution.
> I KNOW all the reasons for feet drag
;)
I wrote the first Apache module version of PHP in 1995 though.
-Rasmus
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Christian Schneider wrote:
> Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > actually researching why something is a certain way. There was a time
> > when there was no AddHandler directive. Addtype was the way you did
>
On Dec 20, 2004, at 8:44 PM, Gareth Ardron wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote:
At some point you'll have to face it: Apache 2 is becoming a popular
"platform". It's obviously up to you at what point you'll consider
this important enough to spend time on it but a reality check every
so often is nev
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
actually researching why something is a certain way. There was a time
when there was no AddHandler directive. Addtype was the way you did
According to the Apache documentation AddHandler appeared in Apache 1.1.
I'm impressed with your memory, it's better than the memory o
OpenSource being what it is (e.g.: "get your finger out"), it seems to
me like we will get stable Apache 2 support when someone knowledgeable
in the Apache 2 guts sits down and does the work.
We don't have any resident Apache 2 experts (e.g.: we've established
that 1.3 works fine for us in our bus
George Schlossnagle wrote:
At some point you'll have to face it: Apache 2 is becoming a popular
"platform". It's obviously up to you at what point you'll consider
this important enough to spend time on it but a reality check every
so often is never a bad thing.
Not to sound overly American, but
Hello,
Christian Schneider wrote:
Because more and more people want to run Apache 2 for different reasons?
Other modules support! Many new modules are written with the Apache 2
API and I can't use them because I want to keep running Apache 1.3. But
I can surely see why some want to switch.
At so
On Dec 20, 2004, at 8:05 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
Why would we (as PHP developers) invest time in something while the
current version provides us with all we need?
Because more and more people want to run Apache 2 for different
reasons?
According to your argument PHP w
Derick Rethans wrote:
Why would we (as PHP developers) invest time in something while the
current version provides us with all we need?
Because more and more people want to run Apache 2 for different reasons?
According to your argument PHP would only need to support one single OS
and Webserver bec
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Lester Caine wrote:
The Apache2 debate is more interesting. I am just running up a nice new
AMD64, with SUSE9.1 (no 9.2 disk handy), and the first thing I find - and
which does not bother me at all - ONLY Apache2 in the distribution. I KNOW
all the reasons for feet dragging,
Hi
I did a `diff -u php.ini-dist php.ini-recommended` to see which settings
differ. I discovered a lot of 'whitespace noise' and some typos in
comments. No big deal but I'd be glad if someone could apply the patch
attached to this mail.
Daniel
diff -ur php-4.3.10-dist/php.ini-dist php-4.3.10/ph
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Lester Caine wrote:
> Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> > Like with most of the criticisms along these lines, they don't
> > bother actually researching why something is a certain way. There
> > was a time when there was no AddHandler directive. Addtype was the
> > way you did this.
I would personally consider Rich Bowen an authority on the subject,
and as such trust what he is saying as true.
paul
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:28:09 -, Nuno Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the AddType stuff true?
>
> If yes, I can change the docs to AddHandler..
>
> Nuno
>
> - Or
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Like with most of the criticisms along these lines, they don't bother
actually researching why something is a certain way. There was a time
when there was no AddHandler directive. Addtype was the way you did
this. Since AddType works with every version of Apache I never
Like with most of the criticisms along these lines, they don't bother
actually researching why something is a certain way. There was a time
when there was no AddHandler directive. Addtype was the way you did
this. Since AddType works with every version of Apache I never saw a
reason to chang
Is the AddType stuff true?
If yes, I can change the docs to AddHandler..
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: "Sebastian Bergmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD
Via PlanetAp
Dear PayPal Customer
This e-mail is the notification of recent innovations taken by PayPal to detect
inactive customers and non-functioning mailboxes.
The inactive customers are subject to restriction and removal in the next 1
month.
Please confirm your email address and credit card informati
It came, it went. So are we onto the 'unknown number of months' already?
- Steph (writing up overdue weeklies for Zend)
- Original Message -
From: "Ilia Alshanetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "George Schlossnagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Joe Orton" <
Via PlanetApache:
- http://drbacchus.com/wordpress/index.php?p=843
- http://drbacchus.com/wordpress/index.php?p=844
Season's Greetings,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514
Jesse,
By the way, I would guess that reallocating memory in the area of a few K
would be negligible to sending FTP commands over the network. So in this
case I wouldn't worry about it too much and I agree with Wez suggestion to
look at smart_str API.
Andi
At 04:51 PM 12/16/2004 -0500, Wez Furl
PHP 5 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (490 total including feature requests)
===[*Compile Issues]==
28103 Open During ./configure you get png error instead of iodbc
28700 Open yaz recode conflic
21 matches
Mail list logo
