On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:05:42 +0100
"Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're after CVS access to ZE 2, aren't you? :)
no.
I don't have karma for ZE and I don't need it at all, really.
I just want my patches to be overlooked and accepted by some more experienced person
(is it's possible).
--
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 23:15:08 -0700
Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this makes sense because PHP could be in an unstable state.
> Think EG(exit_status) covers all possible situations? No time to check
> now how it differs from CG(unclean_shutdown) which is most often used.
Well,
I think this makes sense because PHP could be in an unstable state. Think
EG(exit_status) covers all possible situations? No time to check now how it
differs from CG(unclean_shutdown) which is most often used.
Andi
At 09:57 AM 9/10/2004 +0400, Antony Dovgal wrote:
And the last one, the most ques
Commited. Thanks.
At 09:57 AM 9/10/2004 +0400, Antony Dovgal wrote:
Yet another patch for ZE.
This one fixes rather strange problem - ZE allows multiple declarations of
the same class constant.
It could be a minor BC break, but I'm sure it's a bug.
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal aka tony2001
[EMAIL PROTEC
Another one patch for ZE.
This one fixes the bug #29378.
It looks like this bug was done intentionally (I'm not sure, just an
assumption), so zend_std_get_property_ptr_ptr() doesn't call __get.
Please look at the patch fro details.
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal aka tony2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAI
And the last one, the most questionable patch.
ATM ZE2 calls destructor at the end of the request and no matter
is there were a fatal error (which should probably stop executing the script).
In some cases it leads to nasty segfaults (me and report's author can reproduce
it, but others can't. wei
Yet another patch for ZE.
This one fixes rather strange problem - ZE allows multiple declarations of the same
class constant.
It could be a minor BC break, but I'm sure it's a bug.
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal aka tony2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: zend_compile.c
==
Hi all.
The attached patch fixes bug #27290 (which could be considered as feature request).
The patch proposes to look at the previous op_code to get real line number & filename
where the fuction was called.
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal aka tony2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: zend_e
* Thus wrote Andi Gutmans:
> Please check the archives to see why we don't support object casts to
> integers/doubles.
> Hint: The object id is not unique.
Yeah i checked there, I always get frustrated with to many results
over there :) I'll research that again now that I know there has to
be som
Please check the archives to see why we don't support object casts to
integers/doubles.
Hint: The object id is not unique.
Andi
At 03:45 AM 9/10/2004 +, Curt Zirzow wrote:
In reference to bug #29029 (http://bugs.php.net/29029):
Current casting object behaviour:
int - not able to cast
In reference to bug #29029 (http://bugs.php.net/29029):
Current casting object behaviour:
int - not able to cast
dobule - notice thrown, returns 1.0
null - will return null
bool - returns 1 (from result of double)
string - user __toString() if applicable or 'Object'
Be
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Sara Golemon wrote:
> One last thing: error handlers can be pushed/popped on and off of a stack
> using set_error_handler() and restore_error_handler(), and that's fine, but
> with the recent addition of the ability to fallback on the default error
> handler by returning an exp
The .pdb files contain the debugging info; they should be generated as
part of the debug build.
Dans tips on reading the minidump are handy, but don't tell you how to
get hold of one for an application crash--they cover only a kernel
crash (BSOD). You'll need to do some googling to try and find
excellent tips, thx dan and wez.
do i need to do add any special options to the debug build configuration
to generate the debug symbols? also, what is the release_tsdbg build
configuration? a release build w/ debug symbols?
i'll check out the minidump idea. that'd be ideal, as the client is
rem
Going through some error handling code, I noticed that while Plaintext and
HTML errors use the error_prepend_string and error_append_string php.ini
directives in the construction of their error messages, XML errors do not.
Any particular reason for that?
I also notice that there's no htmlspecialch
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 07:10:51PM +0100, Wez Furlong wrote:
> Hope that helps (and if you find out about the minidump thing,
> please share the knowledge ;-)
This may be of assistance...
Get the Windows Debugger:
http://www.microsoft.com/ddk/debugging/
Here's a tip sheet on the process:
At 02:04 PM 9/9/2004 -0400, John Coggeshall wrote:
Personally I would like to see the hooks for op-codes stay in place, I
think they offer a lot of possibilities for extensions. Andi, what do
you mean "create the handler execution architecture"? I'm a little
confused to what you are referring to.
I'd recommend the Microsoft "Debugging Tools for Windows" to be able
to do very similar things to gdb under windows; it's free, not as
bloated as VC++/VS.Net IDE debugger and comes in console and GUI
flavours.
Caveat emptor:
- you need to understand how to debug
- you want a debug build of php wit
Personally I would like to see the hooks for op-codes stay in place, I
think they offer a lot of possibilities for extensions. Andi, what do
you mean "create the handler execution architecture"? I'm a little
confused to what you are referring to.
John
PS -- I hated the switch() method ;)
On Th
Hi Marcus,
May be it make sence, but I am not sure with you.
At first, if you think __call()/__get()/__set() mast conform to uniform
prototypes and extension will define methods with another prototypes then
PHP should not work with such extensions.
Warning is very bed decision for binary extensio
At 04:30 PM 9/9/2004 +0200, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hi,
probably MBO_0 stands for MarcusBOerger_0 . I am not sure whether this was
somewehere in the coding standards
document, but this means that the programmer has commented the code by
using the preprocessor. The programmer
has to put his name an
FYI, some more information about the proposed changes.
It's really not critical, because I think performance is much more
dependant on how the application is written, the database queries and so
on, but it's quite a nice system which gives us both opcode specialization
and other execution altern
Hello Kamesh,
Thursday, September 9, 2004, 6:10:12 PM, you wrote:
> Hi All,
> Both these test cases expect strict standards but don't have --INI--
> header to have the error_reporting to 2048 or E_STRICT.
> Because of that these testcases fails in local build.
> Am I missing something.
> If I r
Hello Dmitry,
Thursday, September 9, 2004, 5:59:11 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
> Can you explain for what reason you changed prototype of the
> SoapClient::__call?
> This broke receiving of SOAP headers.
__call() is an engine feature that requires either three (PHP 4)
or exactly 2 (PHP 5) param
Hello Dmitry,
Thursday, September 9, 2004, 6:26:42 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
> May be your patch make sense.
> But what is the difference between SoapServer::SaopServer and
> SoapServer::__construct?
> For me, they are equivalent.
__construct is the PHP 5 way whereas using the class name (PHP
Hello Kamesh,
Thursday, September 9, 2004, 6:00:38 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
> That is fine.
> The leak of 2,46,888 I was getting when I had ldap, mysql and xml
> extension enabled.
> After Disabling them and without MBO_0 I had a leak of 87744 bytes.
> After Disabling them and with MBO_0 I had
Hi Marcus,
May be your patch make sense.
But what is the difference between SoapServer::SaopServer and
SoapServer::__construct?
For me, they are equivalent.
Thanks. Dmitry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 14:22
At 10:34 AM 9/9/2004 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> > - Warning: Things might break so keep us posted on how things are
going.
> > (Dmitry, Andi)
execute_internal changed -> breaks Xdebug:
(gdb) run run-tests.php
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/ph
Hi All,
Both these test cases expect strict standards but don't have --INI--
header to have the error_reporting to 2048 or E_STRICT.
Because of that these testcases fails in local build.
Am I missing something.
If I remember correctly from run_tests2.php passes -d
error_reporting=2047 only to all
Don't quite understand the question. How is this different from PHP 4? This
patch improves performance and is not much different from the switch() we
have in PHP 4.
Andi
At 11:26 PM 9/8/2004 -0700, Sterling Hughes wrote:
this is actually a relevant discussion for internals...
-- Forwarde
Hi Marcus,
That is fine.
The leak of 2,46,888 I was getting when I had ldap, mysql and xml
extension enabled.
After Disabling them and without MBO_0 I had a leak of 87744 bytes.
After Disabling them and with MBO_0 I had a leak of 51,912 bytes.
Anyway this figures are as given by NetWare System Cons
Hi Marcus,
Can you explain for what reason you changed prototype of the
SoapClient::__call?
This broke receiving of SOAP headers.
Dmitry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 14:22
> To: Dmitry Stogov; [EMAIL PROTECTE
"Kamesh Jayachandran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi All,
> what this MBO_0 mean?
cvs convention around these parts. rather than #ifdef 0, the person doing
the #ifdef uses his/her cvs user name appended with "_0". in this case the
guilty party appears to be Marcus.
Hello Kamesh,
Thursday, September 9, 2004, 4:37:24 PM, you wrote:
> Thanks Andrey.
> I have Apache with worker thread mpm configured.
> With this MBO_0 macro not defined I get a memory leak of 2,46,888 bytes.
> With this MBO_0 macro defined I get a memory leak of 51,912 bytes.
> If I look at the
Thanks Andrey.
I have Apache with worker thread mpm configured.
With this MBO_0 macro not defined I get a memory leak of 2,46,888 bytes.
With this MBO_0 macro defined I get a memory leak of 51,912 bytes.
If I look at the code also it seems that dtor of the resources are
called only if MBO_0 macro i
Hi,
probably MBO_0 stands for MarcusBOerger_0 . I am not sure whether this was somewehere in
the coding standards
document, but this means that the programmer has commented the code by using the
preprocessor. The programmer
has to put his name and a suffix _0 . Usually code commented this way is
Hi,
may I kindly ask for some advice to an odd behaviour
of ext/imap on Win32? I'm experiencing a connection
delay of about 5 seconds when I try to establish an
IMAP connection from windows to an IMAP server running
on linux.
You can find some traces here:
http://s1-iw.iworks.at/ext.imap
Didn't Dmitry fix this a long time ago? My SOAP constructors work fine with
__construct()
Ron
"Marcus Boerger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> does anything speak against changing soap's ctor's to
> __construct which is the PHP 5 way of doing th
Hello Dmitry,
does anything speak against changing soap's ctor's to
__construct which is the PHP 5 way of doing things? Patch
is attached.
--
Best regards,
MarcusIndex: ext/soap/soap.c
===
RCS file: /repository/php-src/ext/soap/s
Hi All,
what this MBO_0 mean?
I could see the MBO_0 ifdefs removed in 1.62 version of TSRM.c whether
this change has got anything to do with memory leak fix.
I could see 246888 bytes of leak for each thread.
Even the simple script causes 60 bytes of leak.
Where and when the thread local storage i
Hi Derick,
Just one more reminder to apply my patches for NetWare port.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 01:10:56 -0700, "Kamesh Jayachandran"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi Derick,
> Just a remainder to apply my patches for NetWare port.
>
> With regards
> Kamesh Jayachandra
Hi,
(Long time lurker, first time poster).
*Windows only* 4.3.9rc2
sendmail.c sets the date header if you don't supply one, unfortunately it doesn't
respect DST:
I'm in the UK in daylight savings time (i.e. GMT+1)
So the time is 09:50, i.e. 09:50 GMT +0100 (08:50 GMT)
The current mail header
Hello Frédéric,
first of all never rply to another topic with a new one that confuses
our mail clients.
Thursday, September 9, 2004, 2:05:11 AM, you wrote:
> hi all,
> 1)
> i have to implement __set and __get methods in internal class but, actually,
> methods declared in the class function e
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> > - Warning: Things might break so keep us posted on how things are going.
> > (Dmitry, Andi)
execute_internal changed -> breaks Xdebug:
(gdb) run run-tests.php
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/php run-tests.php
[Thread debugging using libthread_
44 matches
Mail list logo
