Is it good idea (and is it possible) to disallow GOTO in main() ?
Andrey
Quoting Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 21:34, BDKR wrote:
> > Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> >
> > > Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > >> Exceptions are not an OOP feature per-se. They are a m
ok thanks. but still, how is it that
mail('[EMAIL PROTECTED]','subject','body',"From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]");
should produce an error message stating "custom "From:" header missing"?
and is there any reason the custom header can't be parsed, and if a
"From:" header is found, to use that instead of
At 01:02 19/08/2004, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
If I remember correctly, the reason that the "call for change" was
included was because the new installation instructions described a
different method of installation than the old installation
instructions.
The "call for change" was for everyone who had
> > >- compile time hooking (no dynamic goto targets)
> > >
> > >
> > That kind of makes them useless for writing parsers, which was one of
> > the justifications of them.
>
> Hmmm you're right. I forgot that in C when doing parsers it's
> commonplace to map the label addresses to some lookup i
> Well, some time ago I wrote a small functions, that does exactly the same:
>
> PHP_FUNCTION(unregister_class)
> {
*snip*
Barring some stylectic differences and a check to make sure it's not an
internal class, that's precisely what I gave sean in
shiva_destroy_class()
But just to be clear, I
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 00:10, Alan Knowles wrote:
>
> >- compile time hooking (no dynamic goto targets)
> >
> >
> That kind of makes them useless for writing parsers, which was one of
> the justifications of them.
Hmmm you're right. I forgot that in C when doing parsers it's
commonplace to
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Sean Coates wrote:
I think Sean is talking about creating an application server _in PHP_.
I understood that.
My chicken and egg comment was this logic:
Marcus: the reason we don't need this is because we don't have [an
application server] that would require it.
Sean: the reaso
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:01:25 -0400
Sean Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello Internals,
>
> Has anyone given thought to a feature that allows (PHP) developer to
> invalidate classes (allowing the developer to re-load the class, with
> modi
- compile time hooking (no dynamic goto targets)
That kind of makes them useless for writing parsers, which was one of
the justifications of them.
Regards
Alan
- goto can only jump to labels within the same scope
- goto could only jump out of blocks and not into
Cheers,
Rob.
--
PH
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Not exactly. In most languages exceptions are objects but in other
languages like C++ you can pass whatever you want as amn exception.
I made the mistake of mixing the general case (out-of-band error
signalling) and the special case (Exception objects in PHP).
--
Sebastian B
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 21:34, BDKR wrote:
> Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
>
> > Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> Exceptions are not an OOP feature per-se. They are a means for out-of-
> >> band error signalling. (Of course they use objects for that which could
> >> be regarded as a turn-off by non
I think Sean is talking about creating an application server _in PHP_.
I understood that.
My chicken and egg comment was this logic:
Marcus: the reason we don't need this is because we don't have [an
application server] that would require it.
Sean: the reason we need it is because I'd like to deve
At 03:30 AM 8/19/2004 +0200, Michael Walter wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 08:23 PM 8/18/2004 -0400, Sean Coates wrote:
Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>Is this worth further discussion?
>
> Not before until we have an application server and php scripts that are
> designed to run for several months. And even
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Exceptions are not an OOP feature per-se. They are a means for out-of-
band error signalling. (Of course they use objects for that which could
be regarded as a turn-off by non-OOP-eople :-)
they can also be a turn-off for performance anxious p
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 08:23 PM 8/18/2004 -0400, Sean Coates wrote:
Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>Is this worth further discussion?
>
> Not before until we have an application server and php scripts that are
> designed to run for several months. And even then we would also need
> improved Reflection supp
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Exceptions are not an OOP feature per-se. They are a means for out-of-
band error signalling. (Of course they use objects for that which could
be regarded as a turn-off by non-OOP-eople :-)
they can also be a turn-off for performance anxious people
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe
At 08:23 PM 8/18/2004 -0400, Sean Coates wrote:
Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>Is this worth further discussion?
>
> Not before until we have an application server and php scripts that are
> designed to run for several months. And even then we would also need
> improved Reflection support and conatiner su
Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>Is this worth further discussion?
>
> Not before until we have an application server and php scripts that are
> designed to run for several months. And even then we would also need
> improved Reflection support and conatiner support and so on and so on.
No disrespect intende
These extra parameters to the TSendMail function are used by imap_mail().
To use this function you need to load the imap extension but you get a few
more options that are not available in the standard mail function. See
http://php.net/imap_mail for more information.
- Frank
> sorry in advance f
Hello Sebastian,
Wednesday, August 18, 2004, 11:58:33 PM, you wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
>> heh? If you're writing procedural code, you do not WANT to use OO
>> features in there, as it makes your code no longer procedural.
> Exceptions are not an OOP feature per-se. They are a means for o
Hello Sean,
Thursday, August 19, 2004, 12:01:25 AM, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Hello Internals,
> Has anyone given thought to a feature that allows (PHP) developer to
> invalidate classes (allowing the developer to re-load the class, with
> modified code)? I
Sean Coates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Internals,
Has anyone given thought to a feature that allows (PHP) developer to
invalidate classes (allowing the developer to re-load the class, with
modified code)? I realize that this is not possible now, and for good
reason.
sorry in advance for the length, formatting and possible redundancy of
this message.
Anyway, on Windows, leaving "sendmail_from" blank and setting a "From:"
header in the extra headers parameter doesn't work.
test.php:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=28976
there are also a couple user notes on th
If I remember correctly, the reason that the "call for change" was
included was because the new installation instructions described a
different method of installation than the old installation
instructions.
The "call for change" was for everyone who had previously written an
article or tutorial on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Internals,
Has anyone given thought to a feature that allows (PHP) developer to
invalidate classes (allowing the developer to re-load the class, with
modified code)? I realize that this is not possible now, and for good
reason. But I think the ide
Derick Rethans wrote:
heh? If you're writing procedural code, you do not WANT to use OO
features in there, as it makes your code no longer procedural.
Exceptions are not an OOP feature per-se. They are a means for out-of-
band error signalling. (Of course they use objects for that which could
be
I'm trying to compile PHP from cvs, but it barfs while trying to generate
zend_language_scanner.c from zend_language_scanner.l. The problem is in the
specified skeleton file: flex.skl, and it seems to be dying near the beginning
on the first '%-' line. I can't find any reference in the flex gramm
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Fabrice Vignals wrote:
> Also, I don't have any php function in mind, that use a "specific array" (
> array $key fixed ) as argument.
I don't think it should necessarily be a fixed array. If someone wants to
append something not in the spec to their cookie, why should we sto
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 08:54:56PM +0200, Fabrice Vignals wrote:
> Good new for this feature.
>
> I think array in arguments is not so good, for documentation +
> comprehension + syntax code
>
> Documentation approximate Syntax :
> bool SetCookie( string $name, [string $value], [array $array('
Since PHP5 many/most filesystem functions can be used with "some" URL wrappers.
That's good and all *but* now it's quite difficult to check if file is on localhost or
not.
It´s possible to use parse_url() and check if "scheme" is set for instance but
I belive we should insert new
On 18.8.2004 10:54 Uhr, moshe doron wrote:
Please read http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29711 we need decision
Got a patch by Rob, which makes it default to UTF-8
Will test it and then commit it (he's away currently)
chregu
--
christian stocker | Bitflux GmbH | schoeneggstrasse 5 | ch-8004 zurich
p
Good new for this feature.
I think array in arguments is not so good, for documentation + comprehension
+ syntax code
Documentation approximate Syntax :
bool SetCookie( string $name, [string $value], [array $array('Max-Age'=> int
$max-age, ['Comment'=> string $comment],
> ['Path'=> relative||ab
I would just like to echo some concerns on namespaces. I've pioneered
the adoption of PHP in some enterprise development groups at Avaya, and
it's been adopted on the merits of the fastest and easiest tool for web
interface development.
Every now and then someone duplicates a class name and mutte
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Jakub Vrana wrote:
> It seems that sending e-mails for CVS commits are temporarily
> unavailable. When I commit something to phpdoc, commit is successful
> but no mail to the list is sent. This is what CVS says:
> Checking in check-references.php;
> /repository/phpdoc/scripts
Derick Rethans wrote:
How is zend_strtolower() magic?
I checked the RFC and we don't even need to convert it to lowercase.
RDC 2109: 4.1 Syntax: General: "Attributes (names) (attr) are
case-insensitive".
BTW: The comment was wrong about Max-Age: -1 to delete a cookie, the RFC
says you have to us
It's fixed, and I also removed this 'call for change' paragraph. It's
unreasonable to ask everyone who ever published an article or a HOWTO to
update their stuff, any more than it makes sense to ask everyone who ever
wrote an XML article to update it for SimpleXML. It has to happen naturally..
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Christian Schneider wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
> >
> > It can be made case-insensitive.
>
> It could be (although this requires some magic) but I'm not sure it
> should be. I'd rather document the RFC-conforming way of specifying it.
How is zend_strtolower() magic?
Deric
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Christian Schneider wrote:
> Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > How about this:
> > setcookie('name',$value,array('Max-Age'=>3600, 'Comment'=>$comment, 'Path'=>'/');
>
> One drawback is that people have to know about the cookie
> specifications, e.g. 'Max-Age': Is it case sensitive,
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
How about this:
setcookie('name',$value,array('Max-Age'=>3600, 'Comment'=>$comment, 'Path'=>'/');
One drawback is that people have to know about the cookie
specifications, e.g. 'Max-Age': Is it case sensitive, does it have a
dash between max and age, etc? That should at le
Please read http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29711 we need decision here.
--
Moshe.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> While that is an idea that will probably work, it seems messy to me. Code
> with hardcoded expiries in the past that previously wouldn't cause any
> cookies to be sent will now suddenly start sending cookies.
Right, I think that is a bad idea too.
>
Can Someone clarify on this?
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:43:20 -0700, "Kamesh Jayachandran"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Can someone clarify me on this?
>
> With regards
> Kamesh Jayachandran
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:46:40 -0700, "Kamesh Jayachandran"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTE
This news posting also says "more easier", and should not. I don't have
the necessary karma to correct this.
S
Sterling Hughes wrote:
http://www.php.net/:
Hereby we would like to kindly ask everyone who published an article
or howto about installing PHP on Windows to revise those instructions
a
43 matches
Mail list logo
