On Fri, 06 Aug 2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
> It never worked really,
Uhm, speaking as the one who implemented this originally, yes, it did
work. Quite well, according to the requirements at the time. The new
entries would simply go to the top of NEWS file.
> messed up the order in the NEWS file (
If anyone in this debate hasn't read my independent request for goto and
"break label;", I would appreciate it if you would:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29287
I fully support the implementation of goto. Line labels will also
immensely improve the break statement, which currently requires yo
Just a heads-up. I haven't rolled 5.0.1 yet because I haven't heard back
from Dmitry about the SOAP bugs yet. I'll ping him again...
Andi
At 12:38 PM 8/1/2004 +0200, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
I saw Dmitry commit several fixes to SOAP extension but I didn't see them
merged. Maybe they should be.
Edin
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Go ahead and add it. I'll use the new SAPI call in our patch.
I'm out the door for a weekend in Tahoe, but I will add it when I get back
in a couple of days.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://w
At 05:21 PM 8/6/2004 -0400, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Aug 6, 2004, at 5:12 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
If you call it get_request_start_time() it should make it clearer what it
means.
I guess we could put it into SAPI I don't see any disadvantage although i
On Aug 6, 2004, at 5:12 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
If you call it get_request_start_time() it should make it clearer
what it
means.
I guess we could put it into SAPI I don't see any disadvantage
although in
any case, doing it one more time per-request wouldn
Go ahead and add it. I'll use the new SAPI call in our patch.
At 02:12 PM 8/6/2004 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> If you call it get_request_start_time() it should make it clearer what it
> means.
> I guess we could put it into SAPI I don't see any disadvanta
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> If you call it get_request_start_time() it should make it clearer what it
> means.
> I guess we could put it into SAPI I don't see any disadvantage although in
> any case, doing it one more time per-request wouldn't be that bad either.
> I hope to have more
Hi Developoers,
I'm asking this here because I've run out of help in php-general (see
"POST superglobal is not set" for history if interested).
I have php-5.0.0 compiled as cgi on redhat linux 7.2 running apache
1.3.22.
When I send html form post to php script, $_POST is empty and $_REQUEST
i
At 08:59 AM 8/6/2004 -0700, Sara Golemon wrote:
> I meant to mention this a while ago, but it slipped my mind. Most web
> servers do that time() call for us at the beginning of the request because
> they need it for logging purposes. I think the right approach here is to
> add a SAPI call to expo
lol :)
"Sara Golemon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Nevermind I already added it in.
> > >
> > Oh, okay... so no need for me to create a feature request?
> >
> Nah, yer too slow ;)
>
> -Sara
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscrib
> > Nevermind I already added it in.
> >
> Oh, okay... so no need for me to create a feature request?
>
Nah, yer too slow ;)
-Sara
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Oh, okay... so no need for me to create a feature request?
Ron
"Sara Golemon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > I noticed the DNS record lookup functions (in the documentation) all
> refer
> > > to as an IPv6 type record. Actually, is obsolete now.. Of
>
> > I noticed the DNS record lookup functions (in the documentation) all
refer
> > to as an IPv6 type record. Actually, is obsolete now.. Of
> course,
> > in PHP it would be very wise to support , but the official type is
A6.
> > You may want to start supporting that in the dns_() fun
> Adding a SAPI call doesn't mean exposure to scripts, so I don't really see
> how this is relevant. Sure, someone could write a PHP extension to
> benchmark different servers, but what are the chances of that? And if
> they are advanced enough to write an extension, they are smart enough to
> no
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Sara Golemon wrote:
> > I meant to mention this a while ago, but it slipped my mind. Most web
> > servers do that time() call for us at the beginning of the request because
> > they need it for logging purposes. I think the right approach here is to
> > add a SAPI call to expo
> I meant to mention this a while ago, but it slipped my mind. Most web
> servers do that time() call for us at the beginning of the request because
> they need it for logging purposes. I think the right approach here is to
> add a SAPI call to expose this. For Apache-1.3 it is right in the
> re
> I noticed the DNS record lookup functions (in the documentation) all refer
> to as an IPv6 type record. Actually, is obsolete now.. Of
course,
> in PHP it would be very wise to support , but the official type is A6.
> You may want to start supporting that in the dns_() functions, or
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> The time() call is part of the patch to check if we should refresh the
> realpath cache for this specific path. If it becomes a problem then we
> might need to think of a less deterministic approach where we call time()
> only every few requests. Another i
Hi,
I noticed the DNS record lookup functions (in the documentation) all refer
to as an IPv6 type record. Actually, is obsolete now.. Of course,
in PHP it would be very wise to support , but the official type is A6.
You may want to start supporting that in the dns_() functions, or if
hey ! i want to make good money with php development too !
do they have this "contract" on bittorrent or something?
"Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, nsangineto wrote:
> > > Where can I apply for a PHP and also Java contract?
> >
> > What
Hi guys,
Anyway, after reading this weeks Weekly Zend (
http://www.zend.com/zend/week/week195.php#Heading4 ), and in particular this
line: "Marcus went on looking into sort(), and subsequently committed a
patch that gives the function a 15% performance increase, while supposedly
listening to an OS
Matthew Boehm wrote:
Returns 11. What is going on? Was my C.S. Professor wrong in telling us
that the % function returns the left side of the decimal in a division?
Try RIGHT side, but as an integer remainder ( fraction * divisor )
--
Lester Caine
-
L.S.Caine Electroni
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Who made this decision??
It never worked really, messed up the order in the NEWS file (especially
for branches) and everybody has been adding stuff to NEWS manually.
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubs
24 matches
Mail list logo
