On Tuesday 23 March 2004 00:13, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> you may consider me responsible for this mess - i must admit i forgot about
> sqlite's oo api a long time ago since it is running...(i know lame excuse)
Obviously if we're going for consistency (and I thing we should) sqlite oo
iterface shou
Hello dv,
you may consider me responsible for this mess - i must admit i forgot about
sqlite's oo api a long time ago since it is running...(i know lame excuse)
Monday, March 22, 2004, 11:57:25 PM, you wrote:
> and SQLite?
>> On Monday 22 March 2004 23:17, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>> > Hmm, nobod
and SQLite?
> On Monday 22 March 2004 23:17, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> > Hmm, nobody told me to change it - now it's too late. Maybe we should
>> > change it in PHP6.
>>
>> Obviously nobody was interested in mysqli OO. Since we are still in pre
>> release we can still change something. So it is up
forewarding a bug report{?} I recieved.
--- Begin Message ---
Hello!
I wrote an RSS parser using PHP 5.0RC1 and SimpleXML and noticed a lot
of irregularities (bugs). I'll summarize them here.
1) There is no way to know if a tag actually exists or not
$xml = simplexml_load_string('123123');
echo(c
On Monday 22 March 2004 23:17, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> > Hmm, nobody told me to change it - now it's too late. Maybe we should
> > change it in PHP6.
>
> Obviously nobody was interested in mysqli OO. Since we are still in pre
> release we can still change something. So it is up to you to decide. Th
Hello Georg,
Monday, March 22, 2004, 10:44:09 PM, you wrote:
> Hi!
>> Not to start a big flame war here, but if the argument at the end of the
>> day was won for the "Let's use studlyCaps for all OO stuff internal in
>> PHP", shouldn't ext/mysqli conform to that? I changed tidy a while ago,
>> a
Hi!
> Not to start a big flame war here, but if the argument at the end of the
> day was won for the "Let's use studlyCaps for all OO stuff internal in
> PHP", shouldn't ext/mysqli conform to that? I changed tidy a while ago,
> and was surprised to see MySQLi has not...
Hmm, nobody told me to cha
Hello su1d,
due to many problems we disabled that feature for now. We may reenable it
for PHP 5.1 if we find a way to solve all related engine problems.
marcus
Monday, March 22, 2004, 12:30:48 PM, you wrote:
> Hi!
> It seems like __toString() method is not called as it is announced on
> http://
Hello Andi, Sebastian,
Monday, March 22, 2004, 1:01:36 PM, you wrote:
> Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> We already have an E_STRICT for that.
> Good :)
Good, but why not use the new style ctor always?
IIRC the reason for changing the bahavior was problems with inheriting old
style ctor's. Maybe we sho
"Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Why is this patch needed? How do you end up with no default host?
>
i have no idea, i'm using default .net and sdk installation, anyway quick
googeling show me that i'm not the first one- so this patch can save some
time
Why is this patch needed? How do you end up with no default host?
--Wez.
- Original Message -
From: "moshe doron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] [WIN32 BUILD] javascript host when no default
> this little pat
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:23:54 +0100 (MET)
"Sabine Seipel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> during I look after some time over the enhancements concering the oci8
> Extension, I don't saw the function OCIRowCount() anymore. which new function
> replaced OCIRowCount()?
ocirowcount(); is now ali
this little patch will reduce the wtfactior for newbies to wsh (like me).
http://moshe.i-com-it.com/patchs/javascript.stick.txt
moshe.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
hi,
during I look after some time over the enhancements concering the oci8
Extension, I don't saw the function OCIRowCount() anymore. which new function
replaced OCIRowCount()?
best regards
Sabine Seipel
--
+++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÜV-geprüfter Virenschutz +++
100% Virener
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> We already have an E_STRICT for that.
Good :)
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Das Buch zu PHP 5: http://professionelle-softwareentwicklung-mit-php5.de/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing Li
Hi!
It seems like __toString() method is not called as it is announced on
http://www.php.net/zend-engine-2.php
The only working case is when you pass an object to echo().
Unfortunately, I couldn't check out the bugs DB, because there's no access
to bugs.php.net from my ISP. So, I'm awfully sorry i
At 12:12 PM 3/22/2004 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Most people will want to use E_STRICT IMO but have lots and lots of
> classes such as PEAR classes which use old-style constructors.
Point taken. But the above does not hold for both styles in the same
class for which
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Most people will want to use E_STRICT IMO but have lots and lots of
> classes such as PEAR classes which use old-style constructors.
Point taken. But the above does not hold for both styles in the same
class for which I highly recommend the E_STRICT.
--
Sebastian Bergma
At 11:36 AM 3/22/2004 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> What would you expect? That if a new style constructor is defined we
> always use that and allow old-style as regular method?
- Old-Style Constructor Only: Use it, but issue E_STRICT.
- Old-Style and New-Style Constru
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> What would you expect? That if a new style constructor is defined we
> always use that and allow old-style as regular method?
- Old-Style Constructor Only: Use it, but issue E_STRICT.
- Old-Style and New-Style Constructor: Use the New-Style Constructor and
issue an E
What would you expect? That if a new style constructor is defined we always
use that and allow old-style as regular method?
At 08:56 AM 3/22/2004 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Andi,
Monday, March 22, 2004, 8:00:42 AM, you wrote:
> We use the last defined constructor. We fixed a problem in
21 matches
Mail list logo
