Hi,
Rob Richards wrote:
Within the dom extension there are a few methods which can be called both statically and off an instantiated object.
The PEAR base class also has this design flaw in several methods. It
has caused nothing but annoying and unfixable bugs. The only good
solution is to red
I work for a company that is using php and would like to
contribute a few helper functions that we find useful.
They are most helpful for anyone doing OO work (especially
if using singletons) who isn't ready to move to php5.
Two of the three are trivial to incorporate, but
for the third I'm looking
It is currently impossible to call a true static method from within a class method. It
lets a class method call any object method statically even when not defined as a
static method. The static method being called inherits the $this from the
encapsulating object. This may not be a big deal with
My purpose is translation of the PEAR manual into Japanese, and mentemance of it.
I did Japanese translation of PEAR manual with Mr. Jokagi since last year. and he
suggest to me that I should apply the CVS account.
So the parts I need access to is "peardoc".
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Dev
Please ignore - this has been fixed somewhere between php5-200402260830 and
php5-200403022230.
Philip
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >This should be fixed now. Thanks for the short reproducing script.
> >
> >Andi
>
> I don't think, that it is fixed in latest cvs.
> Simply changing the script to this, the problem/bug still exists:
[...]
$ cat destruct_segfault.php
foo = fa
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 11:13, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Fixed.
Verified.
> Thanks for the reproducing case.
You're welcome:)
- Timm
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 09:28, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> This should be fixed now.
Verified.
- Timm
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
> You mean that the hasMore is being used just to
> assure the current position is valid. While it should
> be only used to confirm if there are more elements or
> not. Right?
>
Absolutely. To avoid lots of confusion/bug reports, the current hasMore()
should be renamed to isValid().
Philip
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
>
> > FYI: I'm getting lots of unserializer warnings with the latest CVS on
> > Mac OS X.
>
> We have been having this for a lng time, it's safe to ignore.
Cool. It must normally scroll by withou
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
> FYI: I'm getting lots of unserializer warnings with the latest CVS on
> Mac OS X.
We have been having this for a lng time, it's safe to ignore.
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http
FYI: I'm getting lots of unserializer warnings with the latest CVS on
Mac OS X.
-adam
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
author of o'reilly's php cookbook
avoid the holiday rush, buy your copy today!
standard/var_unserializer.lo
var_unserializer.re: In function `php_var_unserialize':
var_unserializer.re:336:
Three elements array:
Current value: one. Calling hasMore() : bool(true)
Current value: two. Calling hasMore() : bool(true)
Current value: three. Calling hasMore() : bool(true)
- last row *should* return false.
I see,
You mean that the hasMore is being used just to
assure the current positio
Hi Marc
Please take a look at the thread headed 'Iterator Class/foreach Logic Flaw?'
- you will find your hasMore() returns TRUE when place on the last element,
but (in the exammple code below), there are only three elements - therefore
when on the third element, hasMore() should return false...
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 09:16, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> > I would suggest as a first step to pull it out of ext/standard and create
> > a pecl extension for it and second to go through and figure out if we can
> > continue to use the ini parser for this,
Hi,
I used to implement the hasMore() method like this:
public function hasMore(){
if (key($this->container) === NULL ) return FALSE;
if ( (key($this->container)) <=
(count($this->container)-1) )
{
return TRUE;
}else
return FALSE;
}
And I think that is what
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 18:45, Petras Kudaras wrote:
> Well, Perl itself does not differentiate from "CPAN modules" or "any other
> modules". Once you can load Perl modules and use the functions (or methods,
> for that matter), you can use any Perl code, and you are not restricted to
> CPAN.
Yes,
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Greg Beaver wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could someone apply this patch to tokenizer.c?
Done
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kai Schröder wrote:
| On Monday 01 March 2004 23:10, Andi Gutmans wrote:
|
|>Hey,
|>As some of you might have noticed, Dmitry worked on a Perl extension which
|>allows PHP to run Perl scripts as well as instantiate Perl objects in PHP
|>and use them.
|
Hi all,
Could someone apply this patch to tokenizer.c? Thanks
Greg
Index: ext/tokenizer/tokenizer.c
===
RCS file: /repository/php-src/ext/tokenizer/tokenizer.c,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -r1.26 tokenizer.c
--- ext/tokenizer
On Monday 01 March 2004 23:10, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hey,
> As some of you might have noticed, Dmitry worked on a Perl extension which
> allows PHP to run Perl scripts as well as instantiate Perl objects in PHP
> and use them.
Intresting idea, but I have some questions:
- Should ext/perl "only" br
Yes, but not with plain functions and perl_eval().
perl_call("func", $arg1, $arg2);
Dmitry.
What about perl_eval("func", PERL_CONTEXT_WHATEVER, $arg1, ...)?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
1. I plan to constributing to PHP and PEAR
2. I want to donating my intellectual for the people
3. I want reporting bugs, if I found it.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> The following could maybe be made to work:
> $x->void->f();
> $x->scalar->f()
> $x->array->f()
>
> Andi
Yes, but not with plain functions and perl_eval().
perl_call("func", $arg1, $arg2);
Dmitry.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.n
Zitat von Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Same problem on win32 snap box which used to work fine. bison version is
1.75.
Should be fixed in CVS now.
Yeah, works again, thanks.
Jan.
--
http://www.horde.org - The Horde Project
http://www.ammma.de - N
The following code attempts to use a class's iterator member with foreach.
This code will not run unless you comment out the offending foreach (marked
'** Comment out the next three lines...').
As demonstrated, it is possible to get() the iterator class and run it using
foreach() externally or to
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> Same problem on win32 snap box which used to work fine. bison version is
> 1.75.
Should be fixed in CVS now.
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Zitat von Jan Lehnardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Jan,
On 2 Mar 2004, at 12:25, Jan Schneider wrote:
bison -y /home/jan/cvs/php5/ext/standard/parsedate.y -o
/home/jan/cvs/php5/ext/standard/parsedate.c
/home/jan/cvs/php5/ext/standard/parsedate.y:389.12: parse error, unexpected
":", expecting ";" or "|
Same problem on win32 snap box which used to work fine. bison version is
1.75.
Edin
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Lehnardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jan Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Parse error in p
Does anybody know whats happen to the java extension
in version 5. Has it been broken?
Hi Jan,
On 2 Mar 2004, at 12:25, Jan Schneider wrote:
bison -y /home/jan/cvs/php5/ext/standard/parsedate.y -o
/home/jan/cvs/php5/ext/standard/parsedate.c
/home/jan/cvs/php5/ext/standard/parsedate.y:389.12: parse error,
unexpected
":", expecting ";" or "|"
make: *** [/home/jan/cvs/php5/ext/standard
bison -y /home/jan/cvs/php5/ext/standard/parsedate.y -o
/home/jan/cvs/php5/ext/standard/parsedate.c
/home/jan/cvs/php5/ext/standard/parsedate.y:389.12: parse error, unexpected
":", expecting ";" or "|"
make: *** [/home/jan/cvs/php5/ext/standard/parsedate.c] Fehler 1
Jan.
--
http://www.horde.org -
Yep I know...
At 11:22 AM 3/2/2004 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
Hello,
During make install I see the following leaks:
/dat/dev/php/php-5.0dev/Zend/zend_execute.c(3644) : Freeing
0x40A1B9FC (44 bytes), script=/dat/dev/php/php-5.0dev/pear/install-pear.php
/dat/dev/php/php-5.0dev/
Hello,
During make install I see the following leaks:
/dat/dev/php/php-5.0dev/Zend/zend_execute.c(3644) : Freeing 0x40A1B9FC (44
bytes), script=/dat/dev/php/php-5.0dev/pear/install-pear.php
/dat/dev/php/php-5.0dev/Zend/zend_variables.c(148) : Actual location (location
was relay
Fixed.
Thanks for the reproducing case.
At 11:25 PM 2/27/2004 +0100, Timm Friebe wrote:
The following script:
public function append($string) {
$this->buf.= ($string instanceof StringBuffer
? $string->buf
: $string
);
}
}
$s= new StringBuffer();
$s->appen
This should be fixed now.
There still is a problem with SimpleXML iterators. They might have to be
fixed due to the changes in foreach().
Andi
At 08:43 AM 2/26/2004 +0100, Timm Friebe wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 08:13, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Please let me know when you are able to reproduce it.
At 08:48 AM 3/2/2004 +0100, Piotr Klaban wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 12:10:51AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> $x = new Perl("Test");
> $y = new PerlScalar($x);
The above could generate mistakes.
It is better to use perl_wantarray(something)
or perl_wantarray(); something;.
> Any ideas or suggesti
37 matches
Mail list logo
