> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Börger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:47 AM
> To: Zeev Suraski
> Cc: Marcus Börger; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] php5 beta
> And once again there is only a problem when mixing old and new
> code. And the
> ide
As far as I could see you only have final for methods, and not attributes.
http://ny1.php.net/talks/show.php/php5intro/19
Regards
Alan
Marcus Börger wrote:
Hello Cristiano,
Friday, June 20, 2003, 9:03:33 PM, you wrote:
CD> Ok, final methods and attributes are cool, but what about final classes
Hello Cristiano,
Friday, June 20, 2003, 9:03:33 PM, you wrote:
CD> Ok, final methods and attributes are cool, but what about final classes ?
CD> Is it hard to implement ? Or all classes must be able to be extended by
CD> children ?
It would be easy to implement and i made a running patch some ti
Ok, final methods and attributes are cool, but what about final classes ?
Is it hard to implement ? Or all classes must be able to be extended by
children ?
Cristiano Duarte.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I'm using the code below to use call_user_function to attempt to make a wddx packet.
What I'm getting is the following wddx packet:
Obviously I'm passing something incorrectly to call_user_function, but since this
is my first time using call_user_function I'm not sure what.
Note that I've teste
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Dan Kalowsky wrote:
>
> > On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 02:53 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >
> > > ? WTF has this to do with each other. Because PHP is not Linux-only,
> > > that doesn't mean we can not provide RPMs too.
> >
> > D
Hello l0t3k,
Friday, June 20, 2003, 4:56:01 PM, you wrote:
l> "George Schlossnagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
l> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 10:04 AM, l0t3k wrote:
>> Why don't use just throw an exception yourself in your extension code?
>> I'm for error
Hello Zeev,
Friday, June 20, 2003, 5:09:19 PM, you wrote:
ZS> At 03:21 20/06/2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
>>In other words i'd like E_WARNINGS to be converted, because that is the normal
>>message generated from functions like database errors ...
ZS> In other words, different people have very diff
At 03:21 20/06/2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
In other words i'd like E_WARNINGS to be converted, because that is the normal
message generated from functions like database errors ...
In other words, different people have very different views about what this
should look like, very contradictory ideas.
On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 10:56 AM, l0t3k wrote:
"George Schlossnagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 10:04 AM, l0t3k wrote:
Why don't use just throw an exception yourself in your extension code?
I'm for errors as exceptions (obviously
"George Schlossnagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 10:04 AM, l0t3k wrote:
> Why don't use just throw an exception yourself in your extension code?
> I'm for errors as exceptions (obviously), but that is only necessary
> for legacy co
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Dan Kalowsky wrote:
> On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 02:53 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > ? WTF has this to do with each other. Because PHP is not Linux-only,
> > that doesn't mean we can not provide RPMs too.
>
> Derick, I think the point of this is to not focus solely on R
On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 02:53 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Ken Tossell wrote:
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
when has PHP (and/or PEAR) become Linux-only software?
It never did. That's another point against RPM.
? WTF has this to do with each other. Because PHP is not Linux-on
On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 10:04 AM, l0t3k wrote:
"Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All in all, I would definitely not see errors-as-exceptions as a
pre-requisite for the beta. It's not an issue to be dealt with
lightly,
and we probably won't have time
"Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> All in all, I would definitely not see errors-as-exceptions as a
> pre-requisite for the beta. It's not an issue to be dealt with lightly,
> and we probably won't have time to finalize it in the next few days that
we
> h
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 05:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
"Jesus M. Castagnetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bottomline, most discussions on what formats to support specifically
> (apart from a source tarball), boils down to: If you want FOO to be
> supported, write the code to support FOO.
Even topline current
Translating the documentation
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
17 matches
Mail list logo
