At 04:51 PM 3/17/2003 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Today I tried to run PHP-GTK with ZE2 changes against current CVS and it
segfaulted. I traced it to the fact that
PG(http_globals)[TRACK_SERVER_VARS] is no longer available if $_SERVER
is not present in the PHP code, due to the changes Zeev (I thi
Jean-Michel Dault wrote
> Le ven 14/03/2003 à 21:14, Jani Taskinen a écrit :
>> Someone requested that we leave the apache2filter there
>> for now..for some reason he didn't explain and I really
>> didn't care. :)
>It was me, and I did explain that apache2handler had
> serious bugs i
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 16:51, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> Today I tried to run PHP-GTK with ZE2 changes against current CVS and it
> segfaulted. I traced it to the fact that
> PG(http_globals)[TRACK_SERVER_VARS] is no longer available if $_SERVER
> is not present in the PHP code, due to the changes Zee
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 16:51, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> Today I tried to run PHP-GTK with ZE2 changes against current CVS and it
> segfaulted. I traced it to the fact that
> PG(http_globals)[TRACK_SERVER_VARS] is no longer available if $_SERVER
> is not present in the PHP code, due to the changes Zee
Today I tried to run PHP-GTK with ZE2 changes against current CVS and it
segfaulted. I traced it to the fact that
PG(http_globals)[TRACK_SERVER_VARS] is no longer available if $_SERVER
is not present in the PHP code, due to the changes Zeev (I think) made
in order to improve efficiency. I don't qui
This breaks the Win32 build.
At 06:32 PM 3/17/2003 +, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
iliaa Mon Mar 17 13:32:15 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/php4/main/streams streams.c
Log:
Fixed bug #22538 (failed stat on stdio/stdin/stderr streams).
Index: php4/main/streams/streams.c
diff -u php4
At 20:38 17.03.2003, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
> You forgot about one idea i do like much more: registering extension
> classes in a seperate namespace (e.g.: the extension name).
That may be nice, but requires an active effort on the extension
authors' part.
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
> You forgot about one idea i do like much more: registering extension
> classes in a seperate namespace (e.g.: the extension name).
That may be nice, but requires an active effort on the extension
authors' part.
> Besides that the idea is really cool and
At 20:30 17.03.2003, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Tal,
I guess you just want to find out which classes an extension defines.
I don't think the current architecture allows for it.
There are two ways of going about it:
1. Keep track of extension classes with a HashTable (or list) in
zend_module_entry. Th
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 14:30, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> Tal,
>
> I guess you just want to find out which classes an extension defines.
> I don't think the current architecture allows for it.
>
> There are two ways of going about it:
>
> 1. Keep track of extension classes with a HashTable (or list)
Tal,
I guess you just want to find out which classes an extension defines.
I don't think the current architecture allows for it.
There are two ways of going about it:
1. Keep track of extension classes with a HashTable (or list) in
zend_module_entry. This list would be updated when
zend_register
Hello,
My idea is to add an extra field to the zend_module_entry struct to enable
extension writers to specify additional function entries (eg. class
methods entries). That will enable get_extension_funcs to return
information about classes defined in the extension, and not only about its
funct
Le ven 14/03/2003 à 21:14, Jani Taskinen a écrit :
> Someone requested that we leave the apache2filter there
> for now..for some reason he didn't explain and I really
> didn't care. :)
It was me, and I did explain that apache2handler had serious bugs in the
previous versions. My reason
This patch fixes two things:
* zend_object_API.c has been renamed to zend_objects_API.c
* zend_mm.c has been added and is needed to compile an application using
the Zend Engine.
Also, I have one related question: how come we say noinst_LTLIBRARIES
instead of lib_LTLIBRARIES? Wouldn't it be good i
That's right.
And not only that.. not all people have access to set things like the include
path themselves, and would have to do it in every script they run using ini_set
().
And just because there's a workaround for a problem, doesn't mean we can't
provide a better solution.
Kelvin
Quoting Da
15 matches
Mail list logo
