Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [linus:master] [e1000e] 861e808602: suspend-stress.fail (e1000e: move force SMBUS from enable ulp function to avoid PHY loss issue)

On Fri, 2024-05-17 at 07:50 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Rui, > > > Thank you for your quick reply. > > > Am 15.05.24 um 11:29 schrieb Zhang, Rui: > > > On Wed, 2024-05-15 at 06:57 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > > > > Can you please s

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH v3] e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function

ed-off-by: Hui Wang > Acked-by: Vitaly Lifshits > Tested-by: Naama Meir > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman > Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel > Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen This indeed fixes another freeze regression on an Intel Broadwell NUC, as reported in below thread, https://lor

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"

On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 08:36 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Hui, > > > Thank you for your patch. > > > Am 10.06.24 um 03:32 schrieb Hui Wang: > > This reverts commit bfd546a552e140b0a4c8a21527c39d6d21addb28 > > > > Commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of > > enable_ulp