On 27/11/2023 16:14, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>
>
> On 2023-11-21 16:29, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 13:56:08 -0700 Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>>> u32 (*get_rxfh_key_size)(struct net_device *);
>>> u32 (*get_rxfh_indir_size)(struct net_device *);
>>> - int (*get_rxfh)(str
On 21/10/2023 3:00, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>
>
> On 2023-10-20 17:49, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:14:11 -0600 Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>>> I replied to that here:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/afb4a06f-cfba-47ba-adb3-09bea7cb5...@intel.com/
>>>
>>> I am kind of confused now so pleas
On 29/10/2023 14:42, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>
>
> On 2023-10-29 06:25, Gal Pressman wrote:
>> On 21/10/2023 3:00, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2023-10-20 17:49, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:14:11 -0600 Ahmed Zaki
On 29/10/2023 18:59, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>
>
> On 2023-10-29 06:48, Gal Pressman wrote:
>> On 29/10/2023 14:42, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2023-10-29 06:25, Gal Pressman wrote:
>>>> On 21/10/2023 3:00, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>>>>
On 31/10/2023 16:40, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>
>
> On 2023-10-31 06:00, Gal Pressman wrote:
>> On 29/10/2023 18:59, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2023-10-29 06:48, Gal Pressman wrote:
>>>> On 29/10/2023 14:42, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>>>>&
On 31/10/2023 16:59, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 5:01 AM Gal Pressman wrote:
>>
>> On 29/10/2023 18:59, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2023-10-29 06:48, Gal Pressman wrote:
>>>> On 29/10/2023 14:42, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>
On 31/10/2023 17:14, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>
>
> On 2023-10-31 08:45, Gal Pressman wrote:
>> On 31/10/2023 16:40, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2023-10-31 06:00, Gal Pressman wrote:
>>>> On 29/10/2023 18:59, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>>>>&
On 31/10/2023 17:20, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:14:58 -0600 Ahmed Zaki wrote:
>> Do you mean add vendor-specific implementation details to common docs?
>> Not sure if I have seen this before. Any examples?
>>
>> Or, we can add a note in ethtool doc that each vendor's implementa
On 22/11/2023 1:33, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Last but not least please keep the field check you moved to the drivers
> in the core. Nobody will remember to check that other drivers added the
> check as well.
The wording of this sentence is a bit confusing, so I might be repeating
what you already s
On 29/07/2025 13:23, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/ethtool.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/ethtool.c
> index f631d90c428ac..7257de9ea2f44 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/ethtool.c
> @@ -164,12 +164,25 @@ nsim_set_fecparam(struct n
On 30/07/2025 14:32, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> On 30/07/2025 11:42, Gal Pressman wrote:
>> On 30/07/2025 12:29, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>>> On 30/07/2025 06:54, Gal Pressman wrote:
>>>> On 29/07/2025 13:23, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/
On 30/07/2025 15:59, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 08:39:25AM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
>> On 30/07/2025 4:51, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:07:59 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>>>> On 29/07/2025 18:31, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>
On 30/07/2025 4:51, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:07:59 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>> On 29/07/2025 18:31, Andrew Lunn wrote:
The only one bin will have negative value is the one to signal the end
of the list of the bins, which is not actually put into netlink message.
On 30/07/2025 12:29, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> On 30/07/2025 06:54, Gal Pressman wrote:
>> On 29/07/2025 13:23, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/ethtool.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/
>>> ethtool.c
>>> index f631d90c428ac..7257de
14 matches
Mail list logo
