Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 3/8] ice: get rid of num_lan_msix field

2024-10-14 Thread David Laight
From: Jacob Keller > Sent: 14 October 2024 19:51 > > On 10/12/2024 8:13 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > + David Laight > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:03:57PM +0200, Michal Swiatkowski wrote: > >> Remove the field to allow having more queues than MSI-X on VSI

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v6 2/9] ice: devlink PF MSI-X max and min parameter

2024-11-04 Thread David Laight
From: Michal Swiatkowski > Sent: 04 November 2024 07:03 ... > > The type of the devlink parameters msix_vec_per_pf_{min,max} is > > specified as u32, so you must use value.vu32 everywhere you work with > > them, not vu16. > > > > I will change it. You also need a pretty good reason to use u16 any

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] ice: health.c: fix compilation on gcc 7.5

2025-02-06 Thread David Laight
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 20:45:46 + Simon Horman wrote: > + Jiri > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:42:12AM +0100, Przemek Kitszel wrote: > > GCC 7 is not as good as GCC 8+ in telling what is a compile-time const, > > and thus could be used for static storage. So we could not use variables > > for tha