Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 12:25:44AM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
>
>
>On 4/26/2024 6:43 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:49:40PM CEST, przemyslaw.kits...@intel.com wrote:
>>> On 4/26/24 13:19, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 06:56:37PM CEST, jacob.e.kel...@intel.com
When the PCI functions are created, Xen is informed about them and
caches the number of MSI-X entries each function has. However, the
number of MSI-X entries is not set until after the hardware has been
configured and the VFs have been started. This prevents
PCI-passthrough from working because Xe
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 04:44:08PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Currently, idpf enables NAPI and interrupts prior to allocating Rx
> buffers.
> This may lead to frame loss (there are no buffers to place incoming
> frames) and even crashes on quick ifup-ifdown. Interrupts must be
> enabled only
Dear Ross,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 29.04.24 um 14:49 schrieb Ross Lagerwall:
When the PCI functions are created, Xen is informed about them and
caches the number of MSI-X entries each function has. However, the
number of MSI-X entries is not set until after the hardware has been
configur
Hello,
This fix is still not queued in 6.8 stable:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/queue-6.8
Why?
Regards,
Artem
On 4/28/2024 1:01 AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
On 27.04.24 13:14, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:54:23AM +, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
This fix is still not queued in 6.8 stable:
What fix?
FWIW, this one:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240417190320.31
+ Alex
On 4/22/2024 8:34 PM, Thinh Tran wrote:
The patch fixes an issue when repeated EEH reports with a single error
on the bus of Intel X710 4-port 10G Base-T adapter, in the MSI domain
causing the devices to be permanently disabled. It fully resets and
restart the devices when handling the P
Hi,
I'm attempting to widen the audience a bit for a discussion about the
ice driver and its current (ab)use and future of using auxiliary bus to
manage cross-function inter-dependencies.
I've included the latest discussion with Jiri, but the full context can
be read from lore.kernel.org:
https:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:22:02 +0200 Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> ## devlink resources (with current API)
> `devlink resource` is compelling, partially given the name sounds like a
> perfect match. But when we dig just a little bit, the current Path+sizes
> (min,max,step) is totally off to what is the mo
