On 10/7/2024 3:29 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Le Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Tony Nguyen a écrit :
...
Thank you for the patch, it would make sense for our iwl-next tree,
with such assumption:
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel
@Tony, do you want it resent with target tree in the
Le Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Tony Nguyen a écrit :
>
>
> On 9/23/2024 1:57 AM, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> > On 9/23/24 00:24, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > The ice workqueue doesn't seem to rely on any CPU locality and should
> > > therefore be able to run on any CPU. In practice th
On 9/23/2024 1:57 AM, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
On 9/23/24 00:24, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
The ice workqueue doesn't seem to rely on any CPU locality and should
therefore be able to run on any CPU. In practice this is already
happening through the unbound ice_service_timer that may fire anywhe
On 9/23/24 00:24, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
The ice workqueue doesn't seem to rely on any CPU locality and should
therefore be able to run on any CPU. In practice this is already
happening through the unbound ice_service_timer that may fire anywhere
and queue the workqueue accordingly to any CPU
