Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/3] igb: XDP/ZC follow up

On Mon Feb 10 2025, Joe Damato wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:19:34AM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote: >> This is a follow up for the igb XDP/ZC implementation. The first two >> patches link the IRQs and queues to NAPI instances. This is required to >> bring back the XDP/ZC busy polling support

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/3] igb: XDP/ZC follow up

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:19:34AM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote: > This is a follow up for the igb XDP/ZC implementation. The first two > patches link the IRQs and queues to NAPI instances. This is required to > bring back the XDP/ZC busy polling support. The last patch removes > undesired IRQs

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/3] igb: XDP/ZC follow up

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:19:34AM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote: > This is a follow up for the igb XDP/ZC implementation. The first two > patches link the IRQs and queues to NAPI instances. This is required to > bring back the XDP/ZC busy polling support. The last patch removes > undesired IRQs

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/3] igb: XDP/ZC follow up

This is a follow up for the igb XDP/ZC implementation. The first two patches link the IRQs and queues to NAPI instances. This is required to bring back the XDP/ZC busy polling support. The last patch removes undesired IRQs (injected via igb watchdog) while busy polling with napi_defer_hard_irqs