nce again, I do apologize for raising my concerns at such a late stage.
I am not a kernel developer anymore these days, and I do not follow any
of the related mailing lists. It was pure coincidence that the net-next
merge of some GTP improvements I was involved in specifying a
but I somehow cannot align what
I see within this patch set with my existing world view of what PFCP is
and how it works.
If anyone else has a better grasp of the architecture of this kernel
PFCP support, or has any pointers, I'd be very happy to follow up
te Session Request) will not be able to benfit from it, but
it's just the first message initiating a dialogue between two elements
(think of it like a TCP SYN). All the follow-up messages in that
dialogue contain TEIDs and hence can benefit from RSS.
--
-
falling in your question of "reasonable use".
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte https://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
atch with all its many different flow types for RSS.
Thanks,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte https://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applica
d usually want to treat v4
different from v6. I'd assume they would usually both follow the same
RSS scheme?
> Regarding Extension Headers and such, I think it would be more
> straightforward to handle them
Hi again,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 08:11:28AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> I cannot really comment on that, as I haven't yet been thinking about how RSS
> might potentially be used in GTPU use cases. I would also appreciate
> some enlightenment on that. What kind of network elemen
n also seeing with patches
against the kernel gtp in recent years: People submit patches but are
not explaining the use cases, so it's hard to judge how relevant this
really is to most users.
--
- Harald Welte https://laforge.gnumonks.org/
===
