Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Question] ixgbe:Mechanism of RSS

2025-01-02 Thread Edward Cree
On 02/01/2025 11:23, Haifeng Xu wrote: > We want to make full use of cpu resources to receive packets. So > we enable 63 rx queues. But we found the rate of interrupt growth > on cpu 0~15 is faster than other cpus(almost twice). ... > I am confused that why ixgbe NIC can dispatch the packets > to t

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 2/5] sfc: use flow_rule_is_supp_enc_control_flags()

2024-06-10 Thread Edward Cree
On 09/06/2024 18:33, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote: > Change the existing check for unsupported encapsulation control flags, > to use the new helper flow_rule_is_supp_enc_control_flags(). > > No functional change, only compile tested. > > Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v6 1/7] net: ethtool: pass ethtool_rxfh to get/set_rxfh ethtool ops

2023-11-27 Thread Edward Cree
On 27/11/2023 16:55, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > BTW, Ed, this series will conflict with your RSS context rework. > Not sure if it is on your radar. Yep, I had noticed. Was wondering how the removal of the old [sg]et_rxfh_context functions would interact with my new API, which has three ops (create