Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RFC net-next] e1000e: Fix real-time violations on link up

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 09:54:12PM +0200, Gerhard Engleder wrote: > From: Gerhard Engleder > > Link down and up triggers update of MTA table. This update executes many > PCIe writes and a final flush. Thus, PCIe will be blocked until all writes > are flushed. As a result, DMA transfers of other t

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v4 3/8] ice: get rid of num_lan_msix field

+ David Laight On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:03:57PM +0200, Michal Swiatkowski wrote: > Remove the field to allow having more queues than MSI-X on VSI. As > default the number will be the same, but if there won't be more MSI-X > available VSI can run with at least one MSI-X. > > Reviewed-by: Wojciec

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 0/2] fix two bugs related to page_pool

On 2024/9/25 15:57, Yunsheng Lin wrote: > Patch 1 fix a possible time window problem for page_pool. > Patch 2 fix the kernel crash problem at iommu_get_dma_domain > reported in [1]. Hi, all Through the discussions, it seems there are some main concerns as below: 1. Semantics changing of supportin