On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 15:59 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Steven Newbury wrote:
> > [ Unknown signature status ]
> > On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 14:53 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 16:06 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > &
On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 14:53 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 16:06 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 16:34 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:42:12PM -0700, James Bottomley
> > > >
On Fri, 2016-06-24 at 11:59 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:14:12PM +0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 15:59 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Steven Newbury
> > > wrote:
> > > > I'm seei
on multiple systems with symptoms indicating that
> i915 was unable to control the backlight on those systems as
> expected.
>
> For this reason, revert commit 8c5bd7a, but leave the function
> acpi_video_backlight_quirks() introduced by it, because another
> commit on top of it uses that function.
>
Works fine for me.
Tested-by: Steven Newbury
By the way, I'm willing to test any i915 backlight patches if it helps.
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 01:02 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Daniel Vetter schreef op za 08-02-2014 om 20:59 [+0100]:
> >> Hm, if this is really a regression between 3.13 and 3.14-rc1 then I
> >> don't see any quick candidates - relevant functions
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 14:25 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 13:15 +0000, Steven Newbury wrote:
> > PCI resource allocation is undergoing some changes at the moment, it's
> > definitely a bug if the Flush Page isn't getting allocated. I'm looking
&g
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 11:12 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jan 2014, "Lu, Ran" wrote:
> > Hi Jani,
> >
> > As a matter of fact, I tried kernel from 3.9 to 3.13-rc6, all of them
> > cannot
> > read the pci information from 0:2.0, and lspci do not have Iris Pro as a
> > video
> > control
I'm building a HD network media player device and thought VAAPI was supposed to
be supported on Pineview, am I wrong?
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 14:52 +, Steven Newbury wrote:
> I'm building a HD network media player device and thought VAAPI was supposed
> to be
> supported on Pineview, am I wrong?
To answer my own question somewhat, from the list here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_GMA
Missed CC to list (forwarded)
- Original message -
From Steven Newbury
Sent Thu, 24 Mar 2011, 12:07:06 GMT
To Sander Jansen
Subject Re: [Intel-gfx] Pineview + libva
> - Original message -
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Steven Newbury
> > wrote:
> >
I'm connecting a D525 (Pineview) based system to an older "HD" (1366x768)
Phillips TV. I has a DVI connector for HD input, but whether I connect it using
the VGA->DVI or HDMI->DVI the TV detects the incomming signal as from a PC and
selects a "XGA" mode, limiting the screen format to aspects and
- Original message -
> I'm connecting a D525 (Pineview) based system to an older "HD"
> (1366x768) Phillips TV. I has a DVI connector for HD input, but whether
> I connect it using the VGA->DVI or HDMI->DVI the TV detects the
> incomming signal as from a PC and selects a "XGA" mode, limitin
- Original message -
>
> > Am I missing something, or does KMS only accept the BIOS provided
> > panel timings?
>
> There is a patch pending about setting LVDS parameters by hand if no or
> incorrect display data is present. But the controlling options are still
> being discussed as I u
- Original message -
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 15:01 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > The LVDS code ignores any connector for which it cannot find a fixed
> > mode (through an EDID, vBIOS tables or the current active mode). Some
> > platforms may include an LVDS header on the board and this may
Sorry, about the empty reply.
- Original message -
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 15:01 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > The LVDS code ignores any connector for which it cannot find a fixed
> > mode (through an EDID, vBIOS tables or the current active mode). Some
> > platforms may include an LVDS he
- Original message -
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:46:55 +0100, Steven Newbury
> wrote:
> > Hi Chris, have you updated this patch? I have an Intel D525 (Pineview)
> > system with HDMI port connected through an LVDS converter. The "panel
> > timings" are the
- Original message -
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Chris Wilson
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:46:55 +0100, Steven Newbury
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi Chris, have
- Original message -
> - Original message -
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Chris Wilson
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:46:55 +0100, Steven Newbury
> > >
- Original message -
> - Original message -
> > - Original message -
> > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Dave Airlie
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Chris Wilson
> > > > wrote:
> >
- Original message -
>
> - Original message -
> > - Original message -
> > > - Original message -
> > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Dave Airlie
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > can you guys ask someone internally about it also, there is a
> > > > > driver somewhere
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Dave Airlie
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > can you guys ask someone internally about it also, there is a
> > > > > > driver somewhere in Google also for driving the LVDS->HDMI
> > > > > > adapter but I'm not sure what i2c bus its hanging off.
> > > > > >
>
- Original message -
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:07:11 +0100
> Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> > Once a NAK has been asserted by the slave, we need to reset the GMBUS
> > controller in order to continue. This is done by asserting the Software
> > Clear Interrupt bit and then clearing it again to res
- Original message -
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:16:27 +0100, Steven Newbury
> wrote:
> > - Original message -
> > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:07:11 +0100
> > > Chris Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > > Once a NAK has been asserted by the s
- Original message -
> - Original message -
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:16:27 +0100, Steven Newbury
> > wrote:
> > > - Original message -
> > > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:07:11 +0100
> > > > Chris Wilson wrote:
> > &g
> > > > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Dave Airlie
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > can you guys ask someone internally about it also, there is a
> > > > > > > driver somewhere in Google also for driving the LVDS->HDMI
> > > > > > > adapter but I'm not sure what i2c bus its hanging off.
> >
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 23:16 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> While preparing 1.15.99.903 server + 2.99.912 intel drv packages
> for Fedora 21, I noticed that both gdm and gnome-shell (tested
> with startx) hang, they show the initial background screen and
> then just sit there.
>
> Build
I tried building the xorg intel ddx driver with only DRI3 support,
with DRI1 and DRI2 disabled.
glxinfo says direct rendering is enabled, but gives no core contexts*.
gnome-shell appears to be using software fallback, generally there
seems to be no hardware acceleration. I'm wondering if DRI3
On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 18:23 +0100, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison harri...@intel.com>
>
> Implemented a batch buffer submission scheduler for the i915 DRM
> driver.
Hi John,
I was just wondering what's happening with this patch series? Are you
still working on it? Doe
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 12:09 +0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
> I tried building the xorg intel ddx driver with only DRI3 support,
> with DRI1 and DRI2 disabled.
>
> glxinfo says direct rendering is enabled, but gives no core
> contexts*.
>
> gnome-shell appears to be us
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 11:13 +0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 12:09 +0100, Steven Newbury wrote:
> > I tried building the xorg intel ddx driver with only DRI3 support,
> > with DRI1 and DRI2 disabled.
> >
> > glxinfo says direct rendering is
30 matches
Mail list logo
