[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/sched: Add missing structure comment

Add a missing structure comment for the recently added @list member. Cc: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Christian König Fixes: 8935ff00e3b1 ("drm/scheduler: "node" --> "list"") Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov --- include/d

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm-misc tree

On 2020-12-09 05:02, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) > produced this warning: > > include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h:201: warning: Function parameter or member 'list' > not described in 'drm_sched_job' > > Introduced by commit

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/sched: Add missing structure comment

Add a missing structure comment for the recently added @list member. Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov Cc: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Christian König --- include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/sched: Add missing structure comment

On 2020-12-09 5:24 p.m., Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Luben, > > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 16:58:07 -0500 Luben Tuikov wrote: >> >> Add a missing structure comment for the recently >> added @list member. >> >> Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov >> >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/amdgpu: Paper over the drm_driver mangling for virt

Yintian Tao >> ; Li, Dennis ; Liu, Shaoyun >> ; Zhang, Bokun ; Yang, Stanley >> ; Sheng, Wenhui ; Gong, Curry >> ; Daniel Vetter >> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] drm/amdgpu: Paper over the drm_driver mangling for virt >> >> Prep work to make drm_device->

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 02/17] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

On 2020-05-12 4:59 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote: > Design is similar to the lockdep annotations for workers, but with > some twists: > > - We use a read-lock for the execution/worker/completion side, so that > this explicit annotation can be more liberally sprinkled around. > With read locks lock

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/managed: Cleanup of unused functions and polishing docs

on how to convert vgem/vkms/i915-selftests. Adjust commit >> message to reflect that. >> >> Cc: Noralf Trønnes >> Acked-by: Noralf Trønnes (v2) >> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg >> Cc: Luben Tuikov >> Cc: amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org >> Signed-off-by: Danie

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev

On 2023-07-12 09:53, Christian König wrote: > Am 12.07.23 um 15:38 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König: >> Hello Maxime, >> >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:52:38PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 01:02:53PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Background is that this makes merge conflict

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

On 2023-11-13 15:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commit > > 0da611a87021 ("dma-buf: add dma_fence_timestamp helper") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. > In order to merge the scheduler changes necessary for the Xe driver, those changes were based on drm-tip, which

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

On 2023-11-13 20:08, Luben Tuikov wrote: > On 2023-11-13 15:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Commit >> >> 0da611a87021 ("dma-buf: add dma_fence_timestamp helper") >> >> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. >> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

On 2023-11-13 21:45, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Luben, > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 20:32:40 -0500 Luben Tuikov wrote: >> >> On 2023-11-13 20:08, Luben Tuikov wrote: >>> On 2023-11-13 15:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>&g

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

On 2023-11-13 22:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Luben, > > BTW, cherry picking commits does not avoid conflicts - in fact it can > cause conflicts if there are further changes to the files affected by > the cherry picked commit in either the tree/branch the commit was > cheery picked from or the

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

On 2023-11-16 04:22, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:56:32PM -0500, Luben Tuikov wrote: >> On 2023-11-13 21:45, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi Luben, >>> >>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 20:32:40 -0500 Luben Tuikov wrote: >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

On 2023-11-22 07:00, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Luben, > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:27:58AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:11:43AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:46:21PM -0500, Luben Tuikov wrote: >>>> O

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm-misc tree

On 2023-11-24 08:20, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, Luben Tuikov wrote: >> On 2023-11-22 07:00, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> Hi Luben, >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:27:58AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 09:

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On 2023-11-26 18:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c:21:41: error: > 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean >