> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Chris Wilson
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 4:06 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Taint (TAINT_DIE) the kern
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/35365/
Judging from PW results, THRESHOLD_TOTAL 95 is still not enough for KBL-shards.
That is interesting.
/Marta
> -Original Message-
> From: Lofstedt, Marta
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:44 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.fre
Reviewed-by: Marta Lofstedt
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Maarten Lankhorst
> Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 11:19 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] kms_atomic_transition
+Petri
PW results are looking good.
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_741/issues.html
From: Lofstedt, Marta
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 11:54 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lofstedt, Marta
Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] test
> -Original Message-
> From: Latvala, Petri
> Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 2:11 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] test/kms_psr_sink_crc - Hack to test
> test_cleanup(&data) for psr_basic
Doesn't look like it is needed for the psr_drrs
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_744/all.html
From: Lofstedt, Marta
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 1:37 PM
To: Latvala, Petri
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: [Inte
Arek,
I didn't get any PW for this maybe because I sent it together with a HACK patch
to get a test run on BAT.
Should I rename both patches and re-send to the list?
/Marta
> -Original Message-
> From: Lofstedt, Marta
> Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:07 PM
&
For the PW results:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41877/
it didn't fix the CRC mismatch on:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_8731/shard-snb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_track...@fbc-1p-pri-indfb-multidraw.html
but that test has always failed on SNB:
http://gfx-ci.fi.inte
Hi,
We have this "old" Lenovo Cantiga laptop(Intel Core 2 Duo L9400), hocked up to
our i915 pre-merge CI system, that has started to give unstable results after
commit:
commit 7b09cc5a9debc86c903c2eff8f8a1fdef773c649
Author: Pavel Tatashin
Date: Wed Mar 22 16:24:17 2017 -0400
sched/cloc
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:pet...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 4:24 PM
> To: Martin Peres
> Cc: Lofstedt, Marta ;
> pasha.tatas...@oracle.com; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Thomas
> Gleixner
> Subject: Re: fr
> -Original Message-
> From: Latvala, Petri
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 12:08 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/meta_test: Add a meta test for sanity checks
> of CI systems
>
> On Wed,
Thanks Ville,
I have verified that below patch-set fix the CI regression on the Core2 duo,
see bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100548
So, if/when this patch-set lands, I assume we could revert the revert of the
"sched/clock: Fix broken stable to unstable transfer": git@841c8c9
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 1:29 PM
> To: Lukas Wunner
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Wysocki, Rafael J
> ; Lofstedt, Marta ;
> David Weinehall ; Sarvela, Tomi P
> ; Ville Syrjälä ;
> Kuoppala, Mika ; Chris Wilson wilson.co.uk>; Takashi Iwai ; Bjorn Helgaas
> ; li
eds of passing tests.
> -Original Message-
> From: Deak, Imre
> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 11:41 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani ; Chris Wilson wilson.co.uk>; Daniel Vetter ; Lofstedt, Marta
>
> Subject: Re: ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series startin
Chris, Jeeja already has a patch that fix this issue in bug 100419, this also
"happens" to be identical to a patch a sent on an internal mail to Intel audio
developers on the 5 of April. But, then they replied they wanted another
solution. I guess it is up to audio dev to decide what solution th
day, May 15, 2017 5:01 PM
> To: Chris Wilson ; Martin Peres
> ; Lofstedt, Marta
> ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/initial_state: Add a test to
> capture
> the state of the GPU
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 02:17:29PM +0100, Ch
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 11:21 AM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta
> Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Martin Peres
> ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/initial
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 12:04 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta
> Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Martin Peres
> ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/initial
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 12:48 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta
> Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Martin Peres
> ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/initial
been created by the test itself or other tests.
/Marta
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Peres [mailto:martin.pe...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:59 PM
> To: Chris Wilson ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
> Lofstedt, Marta
> Subject: Re: [Intel-
Tested OK, also NOTE that this fixes bug 97975
/Marta
> -Original Message-
> From: ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:29 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Lofstedt, Marta
> Subject: [
This should be added to the tests/intel-ci/meta.testlist
/Marta
> -Original Message-
> From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 11:44 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst ; Lofstedt,
&g
Reviewed-by: Marta Lofstedt
> -Original Message-
> From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 11:44 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst ; Lofstedt,
> Marta ; Latvala, Petri
> Subje
Tested-by: Marta Löfstedt
> -Original Message-
> From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 12:26 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst ; Daniel Vetter
> ; Jani Nikula ; Lofstedt,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:02 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/kms_rotation_crc : Remove flip
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:13 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/kms_rotation_crc : Remove flip
&g
When I have some time I will try to fix the test instead of deleting it.
/Marta
> -Original Message-
> From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 5:30 PM
> To: Tvrtko Ursulin
> Cc: Lofstedt, Marta ; intel-
> g...@lis
Thanks Maarten,
Tested-by: Marta Lofstedt
Acked-by: Marta Lofstedt
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Maarten Lankhorst
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:38 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Inte
o: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala ; Chris Wilson
> ; Joonas Lahtinen
> ; Lofstedt, Marta
>
> Subject: [CI] drm/i915: Print the condition causing GEM_BUG_ON
>
> It is easier to categorize and debug bugs if the failed condition is in plain
> sight
> in the actual d
From: Vivi, Rodrigo
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 3:10 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lofstedt, Marta; Martin Peres
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/cnl:
WaDisableGatherAtSetShaderCommonSlice (rev2)
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 11:06:34AM +, Patchwork
This is still an issue, can we please come to some consensus.
My position is to take the V1.
/Marta
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 10:59 AM
> To: Taylor, Clinton A
> Cc:
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 5:36 PM
> To: Latvala, Petri
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] kms_atomic_transition: Outp
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel
> Vetter
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 12:57 PM
> To: Intel Graphics Development
> Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Joonas Lahtinen
> ; Chris Wilson ;
> Lofstedt, Marta ; Marti
Latvala, Petri
> Cc: Chris Wilson ; Lofstedt, Marta
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_eio: Skip in-flight-suspend on snb
>
> On 20/10/17 12:26, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > + Petri
> >
> > On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 16:29 +0300, Martin Peres wrote:
> >>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lofstedt, Marta
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 1:57 PM
> To: 'Martin Peres' ; Joonas Lahtinen
> ; Daniel Vetter ;
> Intel Graphics Development ; Latvala, Petri
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson
> Subject: RE: [PATCH i-g-t] tes
While you are at it could you fix the kms_fbcon_fbt test in the same manner?
And you'll have my R-b
> -Original Message-
> From: igt-dev [mailto:igt-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Chris Wilson
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 11:00 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.
Reviewed-by: Marta Lofstedt
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 12:44 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: igt-...@lists.freedesktop.org; Chris Wilson ;
> Lofstedt, Marta
> Sub
Seems like a good idea to me.
+Mika
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 3:53 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Chris Wilson ; Lofstedt, Marta
>
> Subject: [RFC] kernel/panic
OK cool I'll look out for it landing, CI_DRM_3838 or CI_DRM_3839 I guess.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:50 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Lofstedt, Marta
> Subject:
rom: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 11:37 AM
> To: Lyude Paul ; Maarten Lankhorst
> ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Lofstedt, Marta
> ; Hiler, Arkadiusz ;
> Sarvela, Tomi P ; Martin Peres
>
> Subject: Re:
FYI, bug 101907
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 2:37 PM
> To: Kahola, Mika
> Cc: intel-gfx
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_plane_multiple: Fix
> refe
Before merge, please add:
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907
Reviewed-by: Marta Lofstedt
> -Original Message-
> From: Kahola, Mika
> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:54 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: dan...@ffwll.ch; Latvala, P
+Paolo
> -Original Message-
> From: Lofstedt, Marta
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:17 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Latvala, Petri ; Lofstedt, Marta
>
> Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait
> timeout to 5
Thanks Petri, now I can run testlists again!
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Petri Latvala
> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 2:45 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH
Reviewed-by: Marta Lofstedt
> -Original Message-
> From: Lofstedt, Marta
> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 3:05 PM
> To: 'Petri Latvala' ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Daniel Vetter
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] kms_busy: Fix basic-modese
> -Original Message-
> From: Zanoni, Paulo R
> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 9:56 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta ; intel-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Latvala, Petri
> Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait
> timeout to 5s
&g
Thanks Clinton!
If you add:
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100047
You have my Rb.
/Marta
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of clinton.a.tay...@intel.com
> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 9:23 PM
> To:
> -Original Message-
> From: Zanoni, Paulo R
> Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 5:54 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta ; intel-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Latvala, Petri
> Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait
> timeout to 5s
&g
> Cc: Taylor, Clinton A ; Vetter, Daniel
> ; Lofstedt, Marta
> Subject: [PATCH v3 i-g-t] tests/kms: increase max threshold time for edid
> read
>
> From: Clint Taylor
>
> Current 50ms max threshold timing for an EDID read is very close to the
> actual time for a 2 block
);
- if (lspcon_present || (edid_size > 128 &&
+ if (lspcon_present || (edid_size >= 128 &&
!strncmp(de->d_name, "card0-HDMI", 10))) {
threshold *= HDMI_THRESHOLD_MULTIPLIER;
}
> -Origina
Tested-by: Marta Lofstedt
> -Original Message-
> From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 12:55 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Lofstedt, Marta ; Maarten Lankhorst
>
> Subject: [PATC
> -Original Message-
> From: Taylor, Clinton A
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 8:50 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Taylor, Clinton A ; Vetter, Daniel
> ; Lofstedt, Marta
> Subject: [PATCH v4 i-g-t] tests/kms: increase max threshold time for edid
&g
don't think that the objective of this test is performance of domain
changes, but if we have no other way to explore that issue, I guess we should
not change the timeout.
/Marta
> -Original Message-
> From: Lofstedt, Marta
> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 2:15 PM
> To
Acked-by: Marta Lofstedt
> -Original Message-
> From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 3:42 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst ; Lofstedt,
> Marta
> Subject
arta Lofsted
> -Original Message-
> From: ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 5:39 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Zanoni, Paulo R ; Daniel Vetter
> ; Maarten Lankhorst
> ; Lofstedt, Marta
Thanks Chris,
With this series the test pin-pointed in the bug now pass.
Tested-by: Marta Lofstedt
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Chris Wilson
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 2:05 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedeskto
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 1:47 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta ; intel-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
> increase F
> -Original Message-
> From: Lofstedt, Marta
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 2:54 PM
> To: 'Chris Wilson' ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
> increase FBC wait timeout to 5s
>
+paulo
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 4:12 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta ; intel-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
> increas
e-
> From: Lofstedt, Marta
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 4:34 PM
> To: Chris Wilson ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Zanoni, Paulo R
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
> increase FBC wait timeout to 5s
>
> +paulo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel
> Vetter
> Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 3:10 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Incre
> -Original Message-
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin [mailto:tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 1:46 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta ; intel-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Chris Wilson
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] test/gem_ctx
+ Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: Wajdeczko, Michal
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 2:49 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Wajdeczko, Michal ; Chris Wilson
> ; Saarinen, Jani ;
> Sarvela, Tomi P ; Lofstedt, Marta
> ; Winiarski, Michal
> Subjec
r A ; Wajdeczko, Michal
> ; Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
> ; Ursulin, Tvrtko
> ; Chris Wilson ; Joonas
> Lahtinen ; Lofstedt, Marta
> ; Winiarski, Michal
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/guc: Fix lockdep due to log relay channel
> handling under struct_mutex
>
> This patch f
See bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105069
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Saarinen, Jani
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 9:35 AM
> To: Kumar, Abhijeet ; Takashi Iwai
> ; Chris Wilson
> Cc: intel-g
65 matches
Mail list logo
