Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/65] drm/rcar-du: Annotate dma-fence critical section in commit path

2020-12-15 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, Thank you for the patch. On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 02:21:25PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Ends right after drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done(), absolutely > nothing fancy going on here. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Kieran Bingham &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 16/27] drm/rcar-du: Don't set struct drm_device.irq_enabled

2021-06-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Thomas, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 09:29:05AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The field drm_device.irq_enabled is only used by legacy drivers > with userspace modesetting. Don't set it in rcar-du. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Reviewed-by:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 24/27] drm/vkms: Don't set struct drm_device.irq_enabled

2021-06-24 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Thomas, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 09:29:13AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The field drm_device.irq_enabled is only used by legacy drivers > with userspace modesetting. Don't set it in vkms. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Reviewed-by:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.h

2019-01-15 Thread Laurent Pinchart
his will also conflict with ongoing drmP.h cleanup by others I > expect. > > v3: Rebase on top of atomic bochs. > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg > Cc: Jani Nikula > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi (v2) > Acked-by: Benjamin Gaignard (v2) > Signed-off-by

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/10] drm: Convert connector_helper_funcs->atomic_check to accept drm_atomic_state

2019-05-11 Thread Laurent Pinchart
sn't this slightly more inefficient ? > Changes in v3: > - Added to the set > > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Cc: Jani Nikula > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi > Cc: Ben Skeggs > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Kieran Bingham > Cc: Eric Anho

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/10] drm: Convert connector_helper_funcs->atomic_check to accept drm_atomic_state

2019-05-16 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sean, On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:38:58AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 3:12 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 03:49:46PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > >> From: Sean Paul > >> > >> Everyone who implements connecto

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/10] drm: Convert connector_helper_funcs->atomic_check to accept drm_atomic_state

2019-05-16 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:47:47PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 10:12:02PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 03:49:46PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > >> From: Sean Paul > >> > >> Everyone w

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 2/6] drm: Rename struct edp_vsc_psr to struct dp_sdp

2019-05-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
value bits 7:0 of the G or Y component > > + * DB[5]: CRC value bits 15:8 of the G or Y component > > + * DB[6]: CRC value bits 7:0 of the B or Cb component > > + * DB[7]: CRC value bits 15:8 of the B or Cb component > > + * DB[8] - DB[31]: Reserved > > + * VSC SDP Pay

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 01/38] drm/doc: document recommended component helper usage

2019-02-12 Thread Laurent Pinchart
changes would be quite intrusive. Long term major changes will be needed there anyway as it makes no sense to have to frameworks with similar purposes in DRM/KMS and V4L2. > + */ > + > +/** > * drm_dev_init - Initialise new DRM device > * @dev: DRM device > * @driver: DRM driver -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/17] drm/rcar-du: Convert to using __drm_atomic_helper_crtc_reset() for reset.

2019-03-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
state. I don't think the second sentence applies to this patch. > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Kieran Bingham > Cc: linux-renesas-...@vger.kernel.org > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 11 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 inse

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/17] drm/rcar-du: Convert to using __drm_atomic_helper_crtc_reset() for reset.

2019-03-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Marteen, On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 03:08:20PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 01-03-2019 om 14:13 schreef Laurent Pinchart: > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 01:56:22PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Convert rcar-du to using __drm_atomic_helper_crtc_reset(), instead of &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/17] drm/rcar-du: Convert to using __drm_atomic_helper_crtc_reset() for reset.

2019-03-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Marteen, On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 03:47:02PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 01-03-2019 om 15:36 schreef Laurent Pinchart: > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 03:08:20PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 01-03-2019 om 14:13 schreef Laurent Pinchart: > >>> On F

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/edid: Pass connector to AVI inforframe functions

2018-12-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Ville, On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 21:13:20 EET Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > On 03.12.2018 22:38, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:08:07AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >>> On 21.1

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/edid: Pass connector to AVI inforframe functions

2018-12-05 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Andrzej, On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 10:46:40 EET Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 05.12.2018 07:32, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 21:13:20 EET Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >>> On 0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm: un-inline drm_legacy_findmap()

2018-12-30 Thread Laurent Pinchart
avoid including drm_device.h by un-inlining (Daniel) It would be nice to explain why you de-inline the function (I assume because it's a bit too large). Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Sam Ravnborg > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula > ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm: include idr.h from drm_file.h

2018-12-30 Thread Laurent Pinchart
to make drm_file.h self-contained." Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Sam Ravnborg > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula > --- > include/drm/drm_file.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm: include types.h from drm_hdcp.h

2018-12-30 Thread Laurent Pinchart
luding linux/kernel.h. This prepares for dropping drmP.h from files including drm_hdcp.h." Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Sam Ravnborg > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula > --- > include/drm/drm_hdcp.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm: forward declare struct drm_file in drm_syncobj.h

2018-12-30 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Jani, Thank you for the patch. On Friday, 28 December 2018 10:28:15 EET Jani Nikula wrote: > Make it easier to drop drmP.h includes. Switch from "" to <> includes > while at it. > > v2: forward declare instead of including drm_file.h (Daniel) Reviewed-by: Lau

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] drm/i915: drmP.h include removal w/ drm prep work

2019-01-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
It's also included in drm-tip now. > > So I did this *before* I got the review feedback from Laurent, based on > Daniel's review only. Would you all like me to redo the branch with > Laurent's comments addressed and r-b added? If you think my comments are valuable, th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/connector: Share with non-atomic drivers the function to get the single encoder

2019-09-13 Thread Laurent Pinchart
nector_get_single_encoder to drm_kms_helper module > > Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Signed-off-by: José Roberto

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] gpu:drm: Remove duplicate headers

2019-03-27 Thread Laurent Pinchart
quot; > #include "intel_frontbuffer.h" > > -#include "intel_drv.h" > -#include "intel_dsi.h" > -#include "intel_frontbuffer.h" > - > -#include "i915_drv.h" > -#include "i915_gem_clflush.h" &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 04/11] drm: Convert connector_helper_funcs->atomic_check to accept drm_atomic_state

2019-06-11 Thread Laurent Pinchart
ch/msgid/20190508160920.144739-5-s...@poorly.run > > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Cc: Jani Nikula > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi > Cc: Ben Skeggs > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Kieran Bingham > Cc: Eric Anholt > Tested-by: Heiko Stueb

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/rcar-du: Fix error check when retrieving crtc state

2019-06-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
g this. > > Fixes: 6f3b62781bbd ("drm: Convert connector_helper_funcs->atomic_check to > accept drm_atomic_state") > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Cc: Jani Nikula > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi > Cc: Ben Skeggs > Cc: Laurent Pin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/59] drm/rcar-du: Drop drm_gem_prime_export/import

2019-06-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, Thank you for the patch. On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:35:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > They're the default. > > Aside: Would be really nice to switch the others over to > drm_gem_object_funcs. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Laurent Pinchart

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/59] drm/shmob: Drop drm_gem_prime_export/import

2019-06-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, Thank you for the patch. On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:35:44PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > They're the default. > > Aside: Would be really nice to switch the others over to > drm_gem_object_funcs. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Laurent Pinchart

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] gpu: move from strlcpy with unused retval to strscpy

2022-08-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
> > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wgfRnXz0W3D37d01q3JFkr_i_uTL=v6a6g1ouzcprm...@mail.gmail.com/ > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/atom.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/leg

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/3] i915 writeback private framework

2022-04-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
rivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 7 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 139 +++ > > 15 files changed, 1742 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wb_connector.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wb_connector.h > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wd.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_wd.h -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/22] drm/bridge: Use drm_mode_copy()

2022-02-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
py(&mode, E, S) > + drm_mode_copy(&mode, E) > ) > > @@ > struct drm_display_mode *mode; > @@ > - &*mode > + mode > > Cc: Andrzej Hajda > Cc: Neil Armstrong > Cc: Robert Foss > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Jonas Karlman > Cc: Jernej

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Dmitry, On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 06:32:50AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 07:59, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 05:40:29PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote: > > > Hi Laurent > > > > > > Gentle reminder on this. > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
DRM_CLIENT_CAP_WRITEBACK_CONNECTORS capability to get the writeback connectors exposed by the kernel, but more than that, a large refactoring is then often needed to chase all code paths that assume a connector is a connector. I'm afraid the same applies to the kernel. Drivers that don&#

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Rob, On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 10:27:59AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 7:41 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Feb 2022, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 03:15:03PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > >> On Wed, 02 Fe

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Dmitry, On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:07:41AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 11:00, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 05:10:06AM +, Kandpal, Suraj wrote: > > > Hi Abhinav, > > > > > > > Based on the discus

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Jani, On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:09:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 10:27:59AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 7:41 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > >> > On Wed, 02 Feb 2022, Laure

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:28:27PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:09:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 10:27:59AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > > >> On We

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-03-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Abhinav, On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:28:03AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote: > On 2/28/2022 5:42 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:28:27PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:09:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >>>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
gt;ddev, wb_conn, > @@ -220,7 +222,7 @@ void rcar_du_writeback_setup(struct rcar_du_crtc *rcrtc, > struct drm_framebuffer *fb; > unsigned int i; > > - state = rcrtc->writeback.base.state; > + state = rcrtc->writeback.base->state; > if (!state || !state->writeback_job) > return; > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Jani, On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 03:15:03PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 02 Feb 2022, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 02:24:28PM +0530, Kandpal Suraj wrote: > >> Changing rcar_du driver to accomadate the change of > >> drm_w

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: changes to rcar-du driver resulting from drm_writeback_connector structure changes

2022-02-09 Thread Laurent Pinchart
, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >> On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 16:26, Laurent Pinchart > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Jani, > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 03:15:03PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 02 Feb 2022, Laurent P

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 05/18] video/hdmi: Add Unpack only function for DRM infoframe

2020-03-20 Thread Laurent Pinchart
gt; >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + > >> + if (ptr[0] != HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_DRM || > >> + ptr[1] != 1 || > >> + ptr[2] != HDMI_DRM_INFOFRAME_SIZE) > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/51] drm: Cleanups after drmm_add_final_kfree rollout

2020-04-01 Thread Laurent Pinchart
I can't rely on drmm_* to release them in all cases, as the error path may be hit before touching anything drm-related. Until we figure out a good way forward and test it on a significant number of drivers, let's not add WARN_ON() that will be hit with the majority of drive

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/51] drm: Cleanups after drmm_add_final_kfree rollout

2020-04-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 07:17:40AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 2:50 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:49:18PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > A few things: > > > - Update the example driver in the documentati

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/17] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh

2020-04-03 Thread Laurent Pinchart
_vrefresh(E) ? drm_mode_vrefresh(E) : drm_mode_vrefresh(E) > + drm_mode_vrefresh(E) > > @find_substruct@ > identifier X; > identifier S; > @@ > struct X { > ... > struct drm_display_mode S; > ... > }; > > @@ > identifier find_substruct.S; > expression E; > ident

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/44] drm: Add devm_drm_dev_alloc macro

2020-04-06 Thread Laurent Pinchart
her interface towards userspace ? If the other related subsystem also required allocation of the driver private structure through its corresponding API, we'd be stuck. As stated before, I want this API to be optional. > Cc: Paul Kocialkowski > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Signed-off-by: Dani

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Fix page flip ioctl format check

2020-04-16 Thread Laurent Pinchart
nderstand from the information about that i915 does, but is that usual ? Could there be drivers that really on this check to reject modifier changes, and that aren't prepared to handle them if they are not rejected by the core ? I'm not opposed to this change, but I'd like to carefull

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 01/24] drm: Add ddc link in sysfs created by drm_connector

2019-08-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
in the connector's sysfs directory to expose the I2C adapter used by the connector." Should we also mention that the field isn't meant to be set directly, but shall be set with drm_connector_init_with_ddc() ? "This field shall not be set directly by drivers, use drm_connector_i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 01/24] drm: Add ddc link in sysfs created by drm_connector

2019-08-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Andrzej, On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 03:04:37PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Andrzej, > > Thank you for the patch, and sorry for the late review (I've been > travelling for the past few weeks). > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 07:22:55PM +0200, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrot

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 00/24] Associate ddc adapters with connectors

2019-08-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rk3066_hdmi.c| 7 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_hdmi.c| 6 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c| 7 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/hdmi.c | 7 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 00/24] Associate ddc adapters with connectors

2019-08-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rk3066_hdmi.c| 7 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_hdmi.c| 6 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c| 7 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/hdmi.c

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm-misc tree

2019-08-16 Thread Laurent Pinchart
river is enabled? I think that would take care of > all this. > > Or too annoying for development? > > Also note that fbdev is in drm-misc now, so we should be able to fix > this all without cross-tree conflicts. Note that drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/ will stay, it's drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/ that is being removed. FB_OMAP2 already depends on DRM_OMAP = n, I propose doing something similar at the level of the individual display drivers. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] Linux Kernel 5.2.8 (uvc or i915? <<<)

2019-08-16 Thread Laurent Pinchart
ues here? Any ideas/suggestions? No, uvcvideo seems completely reunlated. > >> @intel-gfx: any ideas about what is going on here with the i915 driver? > >> > >> Original message to lkml: > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAONH+Jm-O6=dq+k2n5pntnmg2sq1kcvnfluwevh6w82opef...@mail.gmail.com/T/#u > >> > >> Previous message for 5.1.21 kernel: > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAONH+JkTFujY9vEyNNuem+9rJ2qBKkf-PbKk9=DBSVEp6kW=y...@mail.gmail.com/ -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm-misc tree

2019-08-16 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:47:15PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 08:23:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 6:48 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > After merging the dr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/30] drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86: (Un)register aux device on bridge attach/detach

2021-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
working with - when the drm_bridge is attached. > Likewise, we unregister the AUX adapter on bridge detachment by adding a > ti_sn_bridge_detach() callback. > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 18 +

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/30] drm/dp: Add backpointer to drm_device in drm_dp_aux

2021-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
@name: user-visible name of this AUX channel and the I2C-over-AUX adapter > * @ddc: I2C adapter that can be used for I2C-over-AUX communication > * @dev: pointer to struct device that is the parent for this AUX channel > + * @drm_dev: pointer to the &drm_device that owns thi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/30] drm/dp: Pass drm_dp_aux to drm_dp_link_train_clock_recovery_delay()

2021-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Lyude, Thank you for the patch. On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 04:53:15PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > So that we can start using drm_dbg_*() in > drm_dp_link_train_clock_recovery_delay(). > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > drivers/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/30] drm/dp: Pass drm_dp_aux to drm_dp*_link_train_channel_eq_delay()

2021-02-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Lyude, Thank you for the patch. On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 04:53:16PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > So that we can start using drm_dbg_*() for > drm_dp_link_train_channel_eq_delay() and > drm_dp_lttpr_link_train_channel_eq_delay(). > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul Reviewed-by: L

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic-helper: reset vblank on crtc reset

2020-05-29 Thread Laurent Pinchart
time. Should these (and likely other) drivers be updated ? Other than that the patch looks good to me, Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > Only call left is in i915, which doesn't use drm_mode_config_reset, > but has its own fastboot infrastructure. So that's the only case where &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/atomic-helper: reset vblank on crtc reset

2020-06-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
fected > by this change to atomic helpers. > > v2: Use the drm_dev_has_vblank() helper. > > v3: Laurent pointed out that omap and rcar-du used drm_crtc_vblank_off > instead of drm_crtc_vblank_reset. Adjust them too. > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/atomic-helper: reset vblank on crtc reset

2020-07-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
e the drm_dev_has_vblank() helper. > > v3: Laurent pointed out that omap and rcar-du used drm_crtc_vblank_off > instead of drm_crtc_vblank_reset. Adjust them too. > > v4: Laurent noticed that rcar-du and omap open-code their crtc reset > and hence would actually be broken by this pa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/25] drm/rcar-du: Annotate dma-fence critical section in commit path

2020-07-07 Thread Laurent Pinchart
would be nice to expand the commit message to give some more context, and especially explain why ending signalling right after drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done() is the right option. I suppose I'll have to check the whole series in the meantime :-) > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/20] drm/xlnx: Initialize DRM driver instance with CMA helper macro

2020-08-13 Thread Laurent Pinchart
e commit message, with at least a brief explanation of why this is correct, and what the consequences here ? > > .fops = &zynqmp_dpsub_drm_fops, > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/20] drm/omapdrm: Introduce GEM object functions

2020-08-13 Thread Laurent Pinchart
e); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.h > index 729b7812a815..9e6b5c8195d9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.h > @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ struct dma_buf *omap_gem_prime_export(

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/21] drm/xlnx: Initialize DRM driver instance with CMA helper macro

2020-09-15 Thread Laurent Pinchart
gt; Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dpsub.c | 14 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dpsub.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dpsub.c > in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/52] drm/rcar-du: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
letter was sent only to dri-devel and intel-gfx, many > recipients of the patches won't have received it... > https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20200219102122.1607365-1-daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch/ I was also going to mention that it would be nice to send the cover letter to all recip

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/52] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
+ __drmm_add_action(dev, action, data, #action) > + > +int __must_check __drmm_add_action(struct drm_device *dev, > + drmres_release_t action, > +void *data, const char *name); > + > +void drmm_add_final_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *parent); > + > +void *drmm_kmalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) __malloc; > +static inline void *drmm_kzalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t > gfp) > +{ > + return drmm_kmalloc(dev, size, gfp | __GFP_ZERO); > +} > + > +void drmm_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *data); > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_print.h b/include/drm/drm_print.h > index ca7cee8e728a..1c9417430d08 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_print.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_print.h > @@ -313,6 +313,10 @@ enum drm_debug_category { >* @DRM_UT_DP: Used in the DP code. >*/ > DRM_UT_DP = 0x100, > + /** > + * @DRM_UT_DRMRES: Used in the drm managed resources code. > + */ > + DRM_UT_DRMRES = 0x200, > }; > > static inline bool drm_debug_enabled(enum drm_debug_category category) > @@ -442,6 +446,8 @@ void drm_dev_dbg(const struct device *dev, enum > drm_debug_category category, > drm_dev_dbg((drm)->dev, DRM_UT_LEASE, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > #define drm_dbg_dp(drm, fmt, ...)\ > drm_dev_dbg((drm)->dev, DRM_UT_DP, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > +#define drm_dbg_drmres(drm, fmt, ...) > \ > + drm_dev_dbg((drm)->dev, DRM_UT_DRMRES, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > > > /* -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/52] drm: Set final_kfree in drm_dev_alloc

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
v_init(struct xen_drm_front_info > *front_info) > fail_modeset: > drm_kms_helper_poll_fini(drm_dev); > drm_mode_config_cleanup(drm_dev); > + drm_dev_put(drm_dev); > fail: > kfree(drm_info); > return ret; -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/52] drm/udl: Use drmm_add_final_kfree

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
gt;drm); > - kfree(udl); > + drm_dev_put(&udl->drm); > return ERR_PTR(r); > } > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/52] drm: Manage drm_mode_config_init with drmm_

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
mode_config_cleanup() be called here ? > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_config_init); > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h b/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h > index 3bcbe30339f0..160a3e4b51c3 100644 > --- a/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_mode_config.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/52] drm/rcar-du: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
atically, removing the need to do so in drivers ? Otherwise when someone will look at the commit later, without having the full context in mind, the reason why the call is dropped won't be immediately clear. With this fixed, Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart This also applies to similar patches for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/52] drm/shmob: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
one for the rcar-du patch taken into account, Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Kieran Bingham > Cc: linux-renesas-...@vger.kernel.org > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/shmobile/shmob_drm_drv.c | 2 -- > drivers/gpu/drm/sh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/52] drm/: Use drmm_add_final_kfree

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
+ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include "vbox_drv.h" > > @@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ static int vbox_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const > struct pci_device_id *ent)

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/52] drm: Manage drm_gem_init with drmm_

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
lease_event(struct drm_device *dev); > /* drm_gem.c */ > struct drm_gem_object; > int drm_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev); > -void drm_gem_destroy(struct drm_device *dev); > int drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv, > struct drm_gem_object *obj, > u32 *handlep); -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/52] drm: Handle dev->unique with drmm_

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
--- a/include/drm/drm_managed.h > +++ b/include/drm/drm_managed.h > @@ -21,5 +21,6 @@ static inline void *drmm_kzalloc(struct drm_device *dev, > size_t size, gfp_t gfp) > { > return drmm_kmalloc(dev, size, gfp | __GFP_ZERO); > } > +char *drmm_kstrdup(struct drm_device

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/52] drm: Use drmm_ for drm_dev_init cleanup

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
drm_gem_destroy(dev); > > - drm_legacy_ctxbitmap_cleanup(dev); > - drm_legacy_remove_map_hash(dev); > - drm_fs_inode_free(dev->anon_inode); > - > drm_minor_free(dev, DRM_MINOR_PRIMARY); > drm_minor_free(dev, DRM_MINOR_RENDER); > - > - pu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/52] drm/: Use drmm_add_final_kfree

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:30:59PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 3:11 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:20:49AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > These are the leftover drivers that didn't have a ->release ho

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/52] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
ged.lock, flags); > + > + if (WARN_ON(!dr)) > + return; > + > + kfree(dr); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmm_remove_action); > + > void *drmm_kmalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) > { > struct drmres *dr; > diff --git a/include/drm/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/52] drm: Manage drm_gem_init with drmm_

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:37:46PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 3:22 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:20:54AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > We might want to look into pushing this down into drm_mm_init, but >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 52/52] drm: Add docs for managed resources

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
+ * @dev: DRM device > + * @size: 0 terminated string to be duplicated s/0 terminated/0-terminated/ > + * @gfp: GFP allocation flags > + * > + * This is a &drm_device managed version of kmalloc_array(). The allocated > + * memory is automatically freed on the final drm_dev_put() and works exactly > + * like a memory allocation obtained by drmm_kmalloc(). > + */ > static inline void *drmm_kmalloc_array(struct drm_device *dev, > size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags) > + > +/** > + * drmm_kcalloc - &drm_device managed kcalloc() > + * @dev: DRM device > + * @size: 0 terminated string to be duplicated Ditto. > + * @gfp: GFP allocation flags > + * > + * This is a &drm_device managed version of kcalloc(). The allocated memory > is > + * automatically freed on the final drm_dev_put() and works exactly like a > + * memory allocation obtained by drmm_kmalloc(). > + */ > { > size_t bytes; > > @@ -41,6 +87,7 @@ static inline void *drmm_kcalloc(struct drm_device *dev, > { > return drmm_kmalloc_array(dev, n, size, flags | __GFP_ZERO); > } > + > char *drmm_kstrdup(struct drm_device *dev, const char *s, gfp_t gfp); > > void drmm_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *data); -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/52] drm: Use drmm_ for drm_dev_init cleanup

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 04:27:57PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 3:35 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:20:52AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Well for the simple stuff at least, vblank, gem and minor cleanup I >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/52] drm: Manage drm_mode_config_init with drmm_

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 04:47:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 2:50 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:20:57AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > drm_mode_config_cleanup is idempotent, so no harm in calling this > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/52] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
b 19, 2020 at 03:28:47PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:20:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>>>> We have lots of these. And the cleanup code tends to be of dubious > >>>>> quality. The biggest wrong pattern is t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/52] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:53:59PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 5:46 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:22:38PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 5:09 PM Emil Velikov wrote: > >>>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/52] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device

2020-02-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Greg, On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 06:00:46PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:22:49PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 2:33 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:28:47PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/52] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device

2020-02-20 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Greg, On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 07:19:32PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 07:36:52PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 06:00:46PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:22:49PM +0100, Daniel Vetter w

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/bridge: remove unused variable warning in tc358764_detach

2020-03-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
e *bridge) > { > struct tc358764 *ctx = bridge_to_tc358764(bridge); > - struct drm_device *drm = bridge->dev; > > drm_connector_unregister(&ctx->connector); > drm_panel_detach(ctx->panel); -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/fb-helper: Remove drm_fb_helper add, add_all and remove connector functions

2020-03-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
nnectors anymore and are just dummy. Now we have no callers to these > functions hence remove them. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya I like this :-) Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > include/drm/drm_fb_helper.h | 21 - > 1 file changed, 21

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/todo: Update drm_fb_helper tasks

2020-03-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
t@psr-suspend. No need to reflow, you can keep the first list entry as-is and just remove the next two. With this fixed, Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > Level: Intermediate > -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/nouveau: Fix unused variable warning

2020-03-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
ector(struct > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, > static void > nv50_mstm_register_connector(struct drm_connector *connector) > { > - struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(connector->dev); > - > drm_connector_register(connector); > } > -- Regards, Lau

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: document how to handle driver private objects

2017-12-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
hat great). > > > > Cc: Harry Wentland > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > > Cc: Rob Clark > > Cc: Alex Deucher > > Cc: Ben Skeggs > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: document how to handle driver private objects

2017-12-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Rob Clark > Cc: Alex Deucher > Cc: Ben Skeggs > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst | 6 ++ > d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: document how to handle driver private objects

2017-12-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 12:03:55 EET Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 06:13:46PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thursday, 14 December 2017 22:30:53 EET Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> DK put some nice docs into the commit introducing driver priva

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: document how to handle driver private objects

2017-12-19 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 16:00:36 EET Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 03:33:57PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 12:03:55 EET Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 06:13:46PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Remove drm_dev_unref() and it's uses

2018-04-26 Thread Laurent Pinchart
#x27;s just replace > all current use cases of drm_dev_unref() with drm_dev_put and remove > the function itself. > > Coccinelle was used for mass-patching. > > Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar I love seeing deprecated functions go. Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Remove drm_dev_unref() and it's uses

2018-04-26 Thread Laurent Pinchart
| 6 +++--- > > drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_drv.c| 4 ++-- > > drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 2 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c | 4 ++-- > > drivers/gpu/drm/vgem/vgem_drv.c|

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 0/8] Non-Intel test suite fixes

2018-04-27 Thread Laurent Pinchart
olerate absence of 8-bit format > > lib/igt_gt.c | 24 ++-- > lib/igt_pm.c | 2 +- > tests/kms_addfb_basic.c | 33 ++--- > tests/kms_panel_fitting.c | 1 + > tests/kms_plane_lowres.c | 1 +

Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm-tip:drm-tip 711/734] drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c:317:6: error: 'struct rcar_du_vsp_plane_state' has no member named 'alpha'

2018-05-15 Thread Laurent Pinchart
rm-misc-next but not merged in the drm tree yet. Dave, how would you like to handle this ? I can rebase my drm/du/next branch on top of your tree once you merge drm-misc-next and send a new pull request, but I'd like to avoid missing the v4.18 merge window. Another option would be to handle th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/edid: Pass connector to AVI inforframe functions

2018-11-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" > Cc: Archit Taneja > Cc: Andrzej Hajda > Cc: Laurent Pinchart > Cc: Inki Dae > Cc: Joonyoung Shim > Cc: Seung-Woo Kim > Cc: Kyungmin Park > Cc: Russell King > Cc: CK Hu > Cc: Philipp Zabel > Cc: Rob Clark > Cc: Ben Ske

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Document code of conduct

2017-04-12 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Chris pointed out on irc that the grammar went a bit wrong here. I'll fix > this to > > "As a freedesktop.org project, dri-devel, and the DRM community, follows > the Contributor Covenant, ..." s/follows/follow/ ? Apart from that and the other small style and typo changes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/cma-helper: Return ENOENT for "no such gem obj"

2017-04-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
mmon error code for failed to > look up an object throughout drm, so let's use it in the cma helpers, > too. Regardless of which is best, it's true that ENOENT is used through the DRM code, so Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart Someone should however mention that this changes the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/18] drm/atomic-helper: Unexport drm_atomic_helper_best_encoder

2018-10-02 Thread Laurent Pinchart
on > the default) let's unexport it. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Gustavo Padovan > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst > Cc: Sean Paul > Cc: David Airlie > Cc: VMware Graphics > Cc: Sinclair Yeh > Cc: Thomas Hellstrom > Cc: Archit Taneja > Cc: Neil A

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/18] drm/atomic-helper: Unexport drm_atomic_helper_best_encoder

2018-10-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Daniel, On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 12:08:38 EEST Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 04:53:12PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 16:35:10 EEST Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > It's the default. The exported version was kinda a transit

  1   2   3   >