This is not quite right.
If no guc loading then there should be no guc_submission can't have submission
without loading.
But, I guess that should be handled later.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
Tvrtko Ursulin
Sen
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 9:40 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [I-G-T] igt/gem_mocs_settings: improve RC6 testings
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:25:29AM +0100, Peter Antoine
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 10:38 AM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [I-G-T] igt/gem_mocs_settings: improve RC6 testings
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:49:51PM +, Antoine, Peter
Please Ignore this patch.
Finger trouble.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Antoine, Peter
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 10:35 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk; Antoine, Peter
Subject: [I-G-T 2/3] igt/gem_mocs_settings: adding RC6 testings
This change
riginal Message-
From: Gordon, David S
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 12:19 PM
To: Antoine, Peter ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/i915/guc: Make the GuC fw loading helper
functions general
On 06/07/16 15:24, Peter Antoine wrote:
> Rename some of the GuC fw lo
nal"/"skip" handler so that the tidyup can be done cleanly.
That was the question that was asked and not answered.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 3:37 PM
To: Antoine
Drop this patch.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 8:37 AM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Chris Wilson ;
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [I-G-T 3/3
Should we not get the HuC patches merged before we amend them?
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon, David S
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:25 PM
To: Tvrtko Ursulin ;
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Ursulin, Tvrtko ; Vivi, Rodrigo
; Antoine, Peter ; Thierry,
Michel
Subject
Just rebasing now.
Is the other patch ok?
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon, David S
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 11:56 AM
To: Antoine, Peter ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Alex Dai
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/i915/guc: Make the GuC fw loading helper
functions
I'll add the blank lines.
Patched should be turned around today.
Thanks for the review.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon, David S
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 12:03 PM
To: Antoine, Peter ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Alex Dai
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/i91
: Antoine, Peter ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/i915/huc: Add BXT HuC Loading Support
On 04/08/16 09:16, Peter Antoine wrote:
> This patch adds the HuC Loading for the BXT.
> Version 1.7 of the HuC firmware.
>
> v2: rebased.
> v3: rebased.
> ch
This would be so much easier if there was actually a link to the test server
rather than having to work it out.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Patchwork [mailto:patchw...@emeril.freedesktop.org]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 9:35 AM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx
Will do for both patches.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:11 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to
I'll remove the comment. :)
-Original Message-
From: Thierry, Michel
Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 9:44 AM
To: Antoine, Peter ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Gordon, David S
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i915/guc: Add Kabylake GuC Loading
On 6/2/2016 6:01 PM, Peter Antoine wrote:
&
to use :) ).
-Original Message-
From: Vivi, Rodrigo
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 7:26 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Antoine, Peter
Cc: Prigent, Christophe ; Kelley, Sean V
; Gordon, David S ; Li,
Lawrence T
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/huc: Add BXT HuC Loading Support
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Gordon, David S
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Antoine, Peter ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Prigent, Christophe ; Kelley, Sean V
; Li, Lawrence T ; Vivi,
Rodrigo ; Dai, Yu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/huc: Unified css_header struct for
-Original Message-
From: Gordon, David S
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 4:08 PM
To: Antoine, Peter ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Prigent, Christophe ; Kelley, Sean V
; Li, Lawrence T ; Vivi,
Rodrigo ; Dai, Yu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/huc: Support HuC authentication
On
Ignore this patch.
It is the wrong patch.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Antoine, Peter
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:27 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Mcgee, Jeff ; Antoine, Peter
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/mocs: Program MOCS for all engines on init
Allow for the MOCS
Sorry chris, resent the patch, it was the wrong one.
I'll update the version and send again.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:36 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [
r the different tables?
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 2:47 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Widawsky, Benjamin
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/sysfs: Adding mocs_state
.intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 5:56 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: Chris Wilson ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
Widawsky, Benjamin
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/sysfs: Adding mocs_state
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:51:21PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
>
> Sorry Ville,
: Gordon, David S
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 2:41 PM
To: Antoine, Peter ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: resize the GuC WOPCM for rc6
On 26/04/2016 10:11, Peter Antoine wrote:
> This patch resizes the GuC WOPCM to so that the GuC and the RC6 mem
Anymore feedback on this?
-Original Message-
From: Antoine, Peter
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 8:17 AM
To: Ville Syrjälä
Cc: Chris Wilson ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
Widawsky, Benjamin
Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/sysfs: Adding mocs_state
It's a little ove
best bet for RC6 issues.
I hope that helps.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Paauwe, Bob J
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 4:59 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vivi, Rodrigo
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: resize the GuC WOPCM for rc6
On Tue, 26 Apr
Reviewed-by: peter.anto...@intel.com
-Original Message-
From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
Nick Hoath
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 11:43 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/guc: Add Broxton GuC firmware l
Reviewed-by: peter.anto...@intel.com
-Original Message-
From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
Nick Hoath
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 11:43 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: O'Rourke, Tom
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Use maj
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 3:20 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: resize the GuC
WOPCM for rc6
On
Ok,
Please ignore this patch.
It is really part of the pre-emption series. Was included as is being used in
Android.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2016 3:20 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx
Yup, I missed a patch.
Just sent a new sequence.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Dai, Yu
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 6:18 PM
To: Antoine, Peter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch; Gordon, Dave; Thierry, Michel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i915/guc: Add Kabylake GuC
Please look at v2, had to change the order of the patches.
-Original Message-
From: Antoine, Peter
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 9:20 PM
To: Dai, Yu; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch; Gordon, Dave; Thierry, Michel
Subject: RE: [PATCH] i915/guc: Add Kabylake
l.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 2:26 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Kernel Crash in drm_unlock
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:09:33AM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> This patch fixes a possibl
Patch ordering, is deliberate. They are not dependent on each other.
I'll rebase and add the new dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org when is resubmit
the patches.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Lespiau, Damien
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 2:35 PM
To: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Antoine,
No problem.
Will sequence them when I re-submit.
-Original Message-
From: Lespiau, Damien
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 2:44 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Kernel Crash in drm_unlock
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at
Probably. I'll need to check this end.
I'll have a look.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:01 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
S
Done.
I'll wait abit any other review responses then update the patch.
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Turner [mailto:matts...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 10:33 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915 :
015 3:54 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915 : Added Programming of the MOCS
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:43:36PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> This change adds the programming of the MOCS registers to the gen 9+
> platforms.
On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 14:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:12:16AM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> > This change adds the programming of the MOCS registers to the gen 9+
> > platforms. This change set programs the MOCS register values to a set
> > of values that are defined
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 11:37 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:12:16AM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> > This change adds the programming of the MOCS registers to the gen 9+
> > platforms. This change set programs the MOCS register values to a set
> > of values that are defined t
On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 17:33 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 04:19:22PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> > This change adds the programming of the MOCS registers to the gen 9+
> > platforms. This change set programs the MOCS register values to a set
> > of values that are defined
-Original Message-
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 8:42 AM
To: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Antoine, Peter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915 : Added Programming of the MOCS
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 08:59
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 08:49 +0100, ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 07:36:41AM +0000, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 17:33 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 04:19:22PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
>
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 10:10 +0100, ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 08:45:10AM +0000, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 08:49 +0100, ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 07:36:41AM +0000, Antoine, Peter wrote:
>
-Original Message-
From: Lespiau, Damien
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:51 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
daniel.vetter.intel@irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com; ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk;
matts...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/i915 : Added
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 16:50 +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:45:44PM +0100, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > Not a blocker. It gets a little more interesting, as the L3CC
> > registers are shared across all engines, but is only saved in the RCS
> > context
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 11:37 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It can't fail really.
>
> Also remove the redundant kms check Peter added.
>
> Cc: Peter Antoine
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c | 5 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 10 +-
> drivers
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 11:37 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> From: Peter Antoine
>
> The context functions are not used by the i915 driver and should not
> be used by modeset drivers. These driver functions contain several bugs
> and security holes. This change makes these functions optional can be
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 11:37 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I've done some extensive history digging across libdrm, mesa and
> xf86-video-{intel,nouveau,ati}. The only potential user of this with
> kms drivers I could find was ttmtest, which once used drmGetLock
> still. But that mistake was quickly
have DRIVER_KMS_LEGACY_CONTEXT enabled?
Is this about right?
Thanks,
Peter.
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 16:00 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:34:25PM +0000, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > This was found by the security guys using an ioctl fuzzer.
> > 12 lines of
]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 3:20 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; airl...@redhat.com;
dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm: Kernel Crash in drm_unlock
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:07:54PM +0100, Peter Antoine
found it) and we should reward them with a application exit.
Peter.
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 15:39 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 02:34:24PM +0000, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > Before the patch the system required rebooting (driver crash and/or kernel
> > pani
Ignore this. I mean S3/S4 not P3/P4.
-Original Message-
From: Antoine, Peter
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 3:25 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: S, Deepak; Weinehall, David; Tian, YeX; Antoine, Peter
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid GPU hang when coming out of P3 or P4
This
Hi,
(replies inline)
-Original Message-
From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 6:04 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; airl...@redhat.com;
dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re
Thanks for the review, new patch inbound.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Wood [mailto:thomas.w...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 4:25 PM
To: Antoine, Peter
Cc: Intel Graphics Development; airl...@redhat.com;
dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Daniel Vetter
Subject: Re: [Intel
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 16:33 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:24:37PM +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
> > On 23 April 2015 at 15:07, Peter Antoine wrote:
> > > There are several issues with the hardware locks functions that stretch
> > > from kernel crashes to priority escalations.
reply at end.
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 13:40 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 05:52:20AM +0000, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > (replies inline)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 16:08 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:29:06AM +0000, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h index
> > > > > 62c40777..367e42f 100644
> > > > > --- a/inclu
; Antoine, Peter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
Tian, YeX; Weinehall, David
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Avoid GPU hang when coming out of
S3 or S4
Yes agreed, we need to make changes in other paths :)
On Tuesday 28 April 2015 02:14 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 15:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:52:32AM +0100, ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:21:49AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> > > On 24/04/15 06:52, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > > > I picked up
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 15:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:52:46PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:07:56PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> > > If an application that has a driver lock created, wants the lock the
> > > kernel context, it is not allo
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:38:25PM +, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > > > > So is the plan to push these patches and have follow-on work to cover
> > > > > the other paths?
> > > > > As this fixes the Bugzilla issue that has been raised.
at 02:07:19PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:46:46PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:38:25PM +, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > > > > > So is the plan to push these patches and have follow-on w
Please ignore this test as fixes are being implemented differently.
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 15:07 +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> There are several issues with the hardware locks functions that stretch
> from kernel crashes to priority escalations. This new test will test the
> the fixes for these fea
62 matches
Mail list logo
