Re:[PATCH 2/5] drm/rockchip: stop passing non struct drm_device to drm_err() and friends

#x27;s better to use "[drm] *ERROR*" prefix when logging > >Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula > >--- > >Looks like it's possible to hunt down the struct drm_device in most of >these cases, if that's desired. This was the simplest change. > >Cc: Sandy Hua

Re:Re:[PATCH 2/5] drm/rockchip: stop passing non struct drm_device to drm_err() and friends

在 2025-01-24 19:43:07，"Jani Nikula" 写道： >On Fri, 24 Jan 2025, "Andy Yan" wrote: >> Hi， >> >> At 2025-01-23 23:09:09, "Jani Nikula" wrote: >>>The expectation is that the struct drm_device based logging helpers get >>>passed

Re:Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/rockchip: stop passing non struct drm_device to drm_err() and friends

Hi， 在 2025-02-26 16:33:21，"Thomas Zimmermann" 写道： >Hi > >Am 25.01.25 um 04:53 schrieb Andy Yan: >> >> 在 2025-01-24 19:43:07，"Jani Nikula" 写道： >>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025, "Andy Yan" wrote: >>>> Hi， >>>> >>

Re:linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, At 2025-07-16 18:31:15, "Stephen Rothwell" wrote: >Hi all, > >After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) >produced this warning: > >drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c:1242: warning: Function parameter or struct >member 'connector' not described in 'drm_bridge_detect

Re:linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hi all, At 2025-07-15 11:55:11, "Stephen Rothwell" wrote: >Hi all, > >After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 >allmodconfig) failed like this: > >drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/megachips-stdp-ge-b850v3-fw.c: In function >'ge_b850v3_lvds_detect': >drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/meg

Re:Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm-misc tree

Hello， At 2025-08-01 12:43:54, "Stephen Rothwell" wrote: >Hi all, > >On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 20:31:15 +1000 Stephen Rothwell >wrote: >> >> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) >> produced this warning: >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c:1242: warning: Function para