Ping. This patch still needs an ack.
Am 31.07.24 um 14:17 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
Replace FB_BLANK_ constants with their counterparts from the
backlight subsystem. The values are identical, so there's no
change in functionality or semantics.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann
Cc: Jyri Sarha
Hi,
On 15/08/2024 10:59, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Ping. This patch still needs an ack.
Am 31.07.24 um 14:17 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
Replace FB_BLANK_ constants with their counterparts from the
backlight subsystem. The values are identical, so there's no
change in functionality or semantics.
Am 15.08.24 um 10:07 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen:
Hi,
On 15/08/2024 10:59, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Ping. This patch still needs an ack.
Am 31.07.24 um 14:17 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
Replace FB_BLANK_ constants with their counterparts from the
backlight subsystem. The values are identical, so
[dropped a bunch of mailing lists and maintainers, added Imre]
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024, "Renan W. P." wrote:
> [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
>
> I can't identify any factual problems beyond a warning in dmesg triggered at
> every boot, i.e., I have seen no features affected. The dme
The function isn't used outside of intel_display_power.c. Make it
static.
Suggested-by: Imre Deak
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h | 3 ---
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 06:12:16PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> The function isn't used outside of intel_display_power.c. Make it
>> static.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
>
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak
Thanks, pushed to din.
> Same applies to intel_displ
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024, Jani Nikula wrote:
> drm_edid_block_valid() is no longer used outside of drm_edid.c. Make it
> static.
>
> Acked-by: Zhi Wang
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Both pushed to drm-misc-next with Sima's R-b on patch 2.
BR,
Jani.
>
> ---
>
> Cc: Zhenyu Wang
> Cc: Zhi Wang
> Cc
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: make intel_display_power_domain_str() static
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/137342/
State : warning
== Summary ==
Error: dim sparse failed
Sparse version: v0.6.2
Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately.
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: make intel_display_power_domain_str() static
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/137342/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_15233 -> Patchwork_137342v1
Summary
--
Hi Dave, Sima,
here's the weekly PR for drm-misc-fixes. It resolves an OOB access
in v3d and a few minor errors.
Best regards
Thomas
drm-misc-fixes-2024-08-15:
Short summary of fixes pull:
panel:
- dt-bindings style fixes
panel-orientation:
- add quirk for Any Loki Max
- add quirk for Any Loki
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 03:00:02PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> The function isn't used outside of intel_display_power.c. Make it
> static.
>
> Suggested-by: Imre Deak
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +-
> driv
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 11:37:17AM GMT, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-xe tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
between commit:
769b081c18b9 ("drm/i915/opregion: convert to struct intel_display")
from the drm-intel tree and com
Hi Dave and Sima,
Here goes another round of drm-xe-fixes.
The amount of patches is higher for this round, but not
because we have more fixes merged this week, but because
of me and because a few fixes are depending on some
other prep/refactor patches, now merged.
1. As I had told you last week,
On 8/9/2024 2:39 PM, Cavitt, Jonathan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jesus
Narvaez
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2024 1:50 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Narvaez, Jesus
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Change GEM_WARN_ON to guc_err to prevent taints
in
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 07:59:47PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> The cast from "long" to "unsigned long" is unnecessary. Remove
> it.
I don't believe we can be that bold in this statement.
Some static analyzer tools might not agree and tell that
if the start or end are negative values we could have
u
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:41:17PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add support for converting struct intel_atomic_state pointers to struct
> intel_display pointers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 3 +++
> 1 fil
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:41:18PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Going forward, struct intel_display shall replace struct
> drm_i915_private as the main display device data pointer type. Convert
> intel_link_bw.[ch] to struct intel_display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:41:19PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Going forward, struct intel_display shall replace struct
> drm_i915_private as the main display device data pointer type. Convert
> intel_load_detect.[ch] to struct intel_display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo V
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:41:19PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Going forward, struct intel_display shall replace struct
> drm_i915_private as the main display device data pointer type. Convert
> intel_load_detect.[ch] to struct intel_display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo V
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:41:19PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Going forward, struct intel_display shall replace struct
> drm_i915_private as the main display device data pointer type. Convert
> intel_load_detect.[ch] to struct intel_display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo V
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:41:20PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Going forward, struct intel_display shall replace struct
> drm_i915_private as the main display device data pointer type. Convert
> intel_alpm.[ch] to struct intel_display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi
(
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:41:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Going forward, struct intel_display shall replace struct
> drm_i915_private as the main display device data pointer type. Convert
> intel_lspcon.[ch] to struct intel_display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:41:22PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Going forward, struct intel_display shall replace struct
> drm_i915_private as the main display device data pointer type. Convert
> intel_dp_aux_backlight.[ch] to struct intel_display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Rodr
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 07:41:23PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Going forward, struct intel_display shall replace struct
> drm_i915_private as the main display device data pointer type. Convert
> intel_hti.[ch] to struct intel_display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
