On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 23:11, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> kernel test robot noticed a -2.9% regression of will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
> on:
>
> commit: 0ede61d8589cc2d93aa78230d74ac58b5b8d0244 ("file: convert to
> SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU")
Ok, so __fget_light() is one of our more performance-cri
== Series Details ==
Series: 0ede61d858: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -2.9% regression
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/126899/
State : warning
== Summary ==
Error: dim checkpatch failed
e2225568ae06 0ede61d858: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -2.9% regression
-:9: WARNING:COMMIT_LO
== Series Details ==
Series: 0ede61d858: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -2.9% regression
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/126899/
State : warning
== Summary ==
Error: dim sparse failed
Sparse version: v0.6.2
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: modpost: "device_is_dependent" [drivers/gpu/drm/drm_kms_helper.ko]
undefined!
Caused by commit
39d5b6a64ace ("drm/bridge: panel: Check device dependency before managing
dev
On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 at 12:23, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> IOW, I might have messed up some "trivial cleanup" when prepping for
> sending it out...
Bah. Famous last words. One of the "trivial cleanups" made the code
more "obvious" by renaming the nospec mask as just "mask".
And that trivial rename
== Series Details ==
Series: 0ede61d858: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -2.9% regression (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/126899/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Error: patch
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/126899/revisions/2/mbox/ not
applied
Patch is empty
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c:21:41: error: 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN'
undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW'?
21 | NOUVEAU_SCHED_PRIOR
On 2023-11-26 18:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c:21:41: error:
> 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean
>
On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 10:26 +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> Move plane sel fetch configuration into plane source files and
> implement selective fetch disable for planes that are not part of
> selective update.
These are now pushed to drm-intel-next. Thank you Ville for your
review.
BR,
Jouni Hög
On 11/24/2023 6:46 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
Use helpers for source min/max input bpc with DSC.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 --
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp
Use helpers for source min/max input bpc with DSC.
While at it, make them return int instead of u8.
v2: Make the helpers return int instead of u8. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 6 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/d
hi, Linus,
On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 03:20:58PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 at 12:23, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > IOW, I might have messed up some "trivial cleanup" when prepping for
> > sending it out...
>
> Bah. Famous last words. One of the "trivial cleanups" made the
12 matches
Mail list logo