[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for ALSA: hda/i915: Fix one too many pci_dev_put()

== Series Details == Series: ALSA: hda/i915: Fix one too many pci_dev_put() URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102755/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11508 -> Patchwork_102755v1 Summary ---

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for ALSA: hda/i915: Fix one too many pci_dev_put()

== Series Details == Series: ALSA: hda/i915: Fix one too many pci_dev_put() URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102755/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11508_full -> Patchwork_102755v1_full Summary

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/migrate: fix semicolon.cocci warnings

From: kernel test robot drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_migrate.c:643:2-3: Unneeded semicolon Remove unneeded semicolon. Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/semicolon.cocci Fixes: da0595ae91da ("drm/i915/migrate: Evict and restore the flatccs capable lmem obj") Reported-by: kernel test robo

[Intel-gfx] [drm-intel:for-linux-next-gt 9/9] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_migrate.c:643:2-3: Unneeded semicolon

-ci/archive/20220416/202204162238.whnwriag-...@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.2.0-19) 11.2.0 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_migra

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/migrate: fix semicolon.cocci warnings

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/migrate: fix semicolon.cocci warnings URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102757/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11508 -> Patchwork_102757v1 Summary ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dmc: Load DMC on DG2 (rev4)

This week I've been working to get the Public CI work more reliably on bat-* machines which are hosted on a different site. The BAT for IGT, IGTPW, CI_DRM and Patchwork seems to be stabilized pretty well, and probably Trybot/TrybotIGT will be added soon enough. This isn't a promise that even one D

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/migrate: fix semicolon.cocci warnings

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/migrate: fix semicolon.cocci warnings URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102757/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11508_full -> Patchwork_102757v1_full Summary

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization

In insert_mappable_node(), the parameter node is cleared late in node's use with memset. insert_mappable_node() is a singleton, called only from i915_gem_gtt_prepare() which itself is only called by i915_gem_gtt_pread() and i915_gem_gtt_pwrite_fast() where the definition of node originates. Instea

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102762/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11508 -> Patchwork_102762v1 Summ

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization

On Sat, 2022-04-16 at 13:23 -0400, Tom Rix wrote: > In insert_mappable_node(), the parameter node is > cleared late in node's use with memset. > insert_mappable_node() is a singleton, called only > from i915_gem_gtt_prepare() which itself is only > called by i915_gem_gtt_pread() and > i915_gem_gtt_

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102762/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11508_full -> Patchwork_102762v1_full

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization

On 4/16/22 11:33 AM, Joe Perches wrote: On Sat, 2022-04-16 at 13:23 -0400, Tom Rix wrote: In insert_mappable_node(), the parameter node is cleared late in node's use with memset. insert_mappable_node() is a singleton, called only from i915_gem_gtt_prepare() which itself is only called by i915_

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization

On Sat, 2022-04-16 at 13:48 -0700, Tom Rix wrote: > On 4/16/22 11:33 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sat, 2022-04-16 at 13:23 -0400, Tom Rix wrote: > > > In insert_mappable_node(), the parameter node is > > > cleared late in node's use with memset. > > > insert_mappable_node() is a singleton, called

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization

On 4/16/22 2:04 PM, Joe Perches wrote: On Sat, 2022-04-16 at 13:48 -0700, Tom Rix wrote: On 4/16/22 11:33 AM, Joe Perches wrote: On Sat, 2022-04-16 at 13:23 -0400, Tom Rix wrote: In insert_mappable_node(), the parameter node is cleared late in node's use with memset. insert_mappable_node() i

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization

In insert_mappable_node(), the parameter node is cleared late in node's use with memset. insert_mappable_node() is a singleton, called only from i915_gem_gtt_prepare() which itself is only called by i915_gem_gtt_pread() and i915_gem_gtt_pwrite_fast() where the definition of node originates. Instea

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization (rev2)

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102762/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11508 -> Patchwork_102762v2 ===

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization (rev2)

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: change node clearing from memset to initialization (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102762/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11508_full -> Patchwork_102762v2_full =