Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/i915: Introduce new macros for i915 PTE

2021-11-12 Thread Michael Cheng
Thanks for the feed back! I feel like using something name GEN6 or BYT for a platform that's not GEN6 or BYT could be a bit confusing, that's why we decided to go with something more generic. I do agree I need to cite the bspec more. Ill wait for more feedback before I send a new revision out.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/i915: Introduce new macros for i915 PTE

2021-11-12 Thread Matt Roper
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 05:42:28PM -0800, Michael Cheng wrote: > Thanks for the feed back! I feel like using something name GEN6 or BYT for a > platform that's not GEN6 or BYT could be a bit confusing, that's why we > decided to go with something more generic. I do agree I need to cite the > bspec

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for Introduce Raptor Lake S

2021-11-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: Introduce Raptor Lake S URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/96869/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10877_full -> Patchwork_21580_full Summary --- **SUCCESS** N

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/dp: Perform 30ms delay after source OUI write

2021-11-12 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/dp: Perform 30ms delay after source OUI write URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/96871/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10877_full -> Patchwork_21581_full Summ

<    1   2