Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] drm/i915: Failsafe migration blits

On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 23:36, Thomas Hellström wrote: > > This patch series introduces failsafe migration blits. > The reason for this seemingly strange concept is that if the initial > clearing or readback of LMEM fails for some reason, and we then set up > either GPU- or CPU ptes to the allocated

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915: Skip gem_exec_fair on GuC based platforms

On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:07:05 -0700, John Harrison wrote: > > On 10/13/2021 15:53, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > >> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c > >> index ef5a450f6..ca9c73c6e 100644 > >> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c > >> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c > >>

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: make a gt sysfs group and move power management files

From: Andi Shyti The GT has its own properties and in sysfs they should be grouped in the 'gt/' directory. Create a 'gt/' directory in sysfs which will contain gt0...gtN directories related to each tile configured in the GPU. Move the power management files inside those directories. The previou

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/25] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 05:10:39PM -0700, John Harrison wrote: > On 10/13/2021 13:42, Matthew Brost wrote: > > Add multi-lrc context registration H2G. In addition a workqueue and > > process descriptor are setup during multi-lrc context registration as > > these data structures are needed for multi

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 5:02 AM wrote: > > Hi, > > I review the code. > > It seems I forget to delete the definition of the variable "inst",I'm sry for > that.: ( > > I'll submit another patch soon. > I already wrote the patch and pushed it: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/l

<    1   2   3