Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/hdcp: Update CP as per the kernel internal state

2020-05-15 Thread Anshuman Gupta
On 2020-05-15 at 07:56:25 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Anshuman Gupta (2020-05-15 07:10:29) > > Somewhere in the line, state machine to set content protection to > > DESIRED from kernel was broken and IGT coverage was missing for it. > > This patch fixes it. > > It's strange that you menti

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/hdcp: Update CP as per the kernel internal state

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Anshuman Gupta (2020-05-15 08:10:06) > On 2020-05-15 at 07:56:25 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Anshuman Gupta (2020-05-15 07:10:29) > > > Somewhere in the line, state machine to set content protection to > > > DESIRED from kernel was broken and IGT coverage was missing for it. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/execlists: Optimise away false timeslicing on virtual engines

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Chris Wilson (2020-05-14 17:54:36) > The virtual timeslicing failed under a series of unfortunate slices. > Suppose the user submitted a virtual request, over [vcs0, vcs1] and also > a request that dependent upon the result of the virtal request to vcs0. > > submit {veng, vcs0} > time slic

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dsb: Pre allocate and late cleanup of cmd buffer (rev7)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/dsb: Pre allocate and late cleanup of cmd buffer (rev7) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73036/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8486 -> Patchwork_17661 Summa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/16] drm/i915: Don't fully disable HDCP on a port if multiple pipes are using it

2020-05-15 Thread Ramalingam C
On 2020-04-29 at 15:54:54 -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > From: Sean Paul > > This patch is required for HDCP over MST. If a port is being used for > multiple HDCP streams, we don't want to fully disable HDCP on a port if > one of them is disabled. Instead, we just disable the HDCP signalling on > that

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/44] drivers/base: Always release devres on device_del

2020-05-15 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:15:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:55:28PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:38 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/dp_mst: Fix timeout handling of MST down messages

2020-05-15 Thread Imre Deak
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 02:40:29PM +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/dp_mst: Fix timeout handling of MST down messages > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77216/ > State : success Patch pushed to drm-misc-next, thanks for the review. > > == Summary ==

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 00/14] In order to readout DP SDPs, refactors the handling of DP SDPs

2020-05-15 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 02:19:23PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2020, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: > > In order to readout DP SDPs (Secondary Data Packet: DP HDR Metadata > > Infoframe SDP, DP VSC SDP), it refactors handling DP SDPs codes. > > It adds new compute routines for DP HDR Metada

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 00/14] In order to readout DP SDPs, refactors the handling of DP SDPs

2020-05-15 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 15 May 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 02:19:23PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Thu, 14 May 2020, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: >> > In order to readout DP SDPs (Secondary Data Packet: DP HDR Metadata >> > Infoframe SDP, DP VSC SDP), it refactors handling DP SDPs codes. >>

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/gt: Kick virtual siblings on timeslice out (rev2)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/gt: Kick virtual siblings on timeslice out (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77270/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 4b40173a09ce drm/i915/gt: Kick virtual siblings on timeslice o

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/dsb: Pre allocate and late cleanup of cmd buffer (rev7)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/dsb: Pre allocate and late cleanup of cmd buffer (rev7) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73036/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8486_full -> Patchwork_17661_full =

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/44] drivers/base: Always release devres on device_del

2020-05-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 02:55:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:15:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:55:28PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:38 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 0

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for In order to readout DP SDPs, refactors the handling of DP SDPs (rev14)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: In order to readout DP SDPs, refactors the handling of DP SDPs (rev14) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72853/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8481 -> Patchwork_17654

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 00/14] In order to readout DP SDPs, refactors the handling of DP SDPs

2020-05-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 04:13:18PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 15 May 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 02:19:23PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 May 2020, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote: > >> > In order to readout DP SDPs (Secondary Data Packet: DP HDR Metadata > >

[Intel-gfx] XDC 2020: Registration & Call for Proposals now open!

2020-05-15 Thread Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw
Hello! Registration & Call for Proposals are now open for XDC 2020, which will take place at the Gdańsk University of Technology in Gdańsk, Poland on September 16-18, 2020. Thanks to LWN.net for hosting the website again this year! https://xdc2020.x.org As usual, the conference is free

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/gt: Kick virtual siblings on timeslice out (rev2)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/gt: Kick virtual siblings on timeslice out (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77270/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8488 -> Patchwork_17662 =

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/params: don't expose inject_probe_failure in debugfs

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/params: don't expose inject_probe_failure in debugfs URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77272/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip e80307f07467 drm/i915/params: don't expose inject_probe_fai

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 00/14] In order to readout DP SDPs, refactors the handling of DP SDPs

2020-05-15 Thread Saarinen, Jani
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Jani > Nikula > Sent: perjantai 15. toukokuuta 2020 16.13 > To: Ville Syrjälä > Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org; daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; > laurent.pinch...@ideas

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/params: don't expose inject_probe_failure in debugfs

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/params: don't expose inject_probe_failure in debugfs URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77272/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8488 -> Patchwork_17663 ==

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 16/16] drm/i915: Add HDCP 1.4 support for MST connectors

2020-05-15 Thread Ramalingam C
On 2020-04-29 at 15:55:02 -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > From: Sean Paul > > Now that all the groundwork has been laid, we can turn on HDCP 1.4 over > MST. Everything except for toggling the HDCP signalling and HDCP 2.2 > support is the same as the DP case, so we'll re-use those callbacks > > Cc: Jus

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 00/16] drm/i915: Add support for HDCP 1.4 over MST connectors

2020-05-15 Thread Ramalingam C
On 2020-04-29 at 15:54:46 -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > From: Sean Paul > > Changes in v6: > -Rebased on -tip > -Disabled HDCP over MST on GEN12 > -Addressed Lyude's review comments in the QUERY_STREAM_ENCRYPTION_STATUS patch Sean, What is the test setup you have used? I am afraid our CI dont have

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Measure dispatch latency

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
A useful metric of the system's health is how fast we can tell the GPU to do various actions, so measure our latency. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Mika Kuoppala --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c | 505 ++ 1 file changed, 505 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev13)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: Consider DBuf bandwidth when calculating CDCLK (rev13) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74739/ State : failure == Summary == Applying: drm/i915: Decouple cdclk calculation from modeset checks Applying: drm/i915: Extract cdclk requirements checking to

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing virtual engines

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing virtual engines URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77273/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip c7bf75e1ee55 drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing virtual engines -:72: CHECK:

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree

2020-05-15 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
Hi Stephen, On 23/04/2020 06:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:10:25 +0300 Tomi Valkeinen > wrote: >> >> On 21/04/2020 04:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> >>> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:he drm-misc >>> tree with the drm-misc-fi

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing virtual engines

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing virtual engines URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77273/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8488 -> Patchwork_17665 Summary

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing virtual engines

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing virtual engines URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77274/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 175d05822d38 drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-05-15 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
30 (2020-04-30 11:13:21 +0300) are available in the Git repository at: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel tags/drm-intel-next-2020-05-15 for you to fetch changes up to 3a36aa237e4ed04553c0998cf5f47eda3e206e4f: drm/i915: Update DRIVER_DATE to

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing virtual engines

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing virtual engines URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77274/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8488 -> Patchwork_17666 ==

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix AUX power domain toggling across TypeC mode resets

2020-05-15 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:45:53PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > Make sure to select the port's AUX power domain while holding the TC > port lock. The domain depends on the port's current TC mode, which may > get changed under us if we're not holding the lock. Can we toss in a lockdep assert? Did thi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Fix max cursor size for i915g/gm

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Ville Syrjala (2019-10-28 11:30:32) > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Apparently the 128x128 and 256x256 ARGB cursor modes were > only added on LPT/CST. > > While the display section of bspec isn't super clear on the > subject, it does highlight these two modes in a different > color, has a few

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Fix overlay colorkey for 30bpp and 8bpp

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Ville Syrjala (2019-10-28 11:30:33) > From: Ville Syrjälä > > As with the video sprites the colorkey is always specified > as 8bpc. > For 10bpc primary plane formats we just ignore the > two lsbs of each component. Sensible. > For C8 we'll replicate the same > key to each chanel, which

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Configure overlay cc_out precision based on crtc gamma config

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Ville Syrjala (2019-10-28 11:30:34) > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Put the overlay color conversion unit into 10bit mode if the > pipe isn't using the 8bit legacy gamma. Not 100% sure this is > what the intention of the bit was but makes at least some sense to > me. > > Signed-off-by: Ville S

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Enable pipe gamma for the overlay

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Ville Syrjala (2019-10-28 11:30:35) > From: Ville Syrjälä > > We pass the plane data through the pipe gamma for all the other > planes. Can't see why we should treat the overlay differently, > so let's enable pipe gamma for it as well. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- > drivers/g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Protect overlay colorkey macro arguments

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Ville Syrjala (2019-10-28 11:30:36) > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Put the customary () around the macro argument in the overlay > colorkey macros. And while at switch to using a consistent > case for the hex constants. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/dp: Include the AUX CH name in the debug messages

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/dp: Include the AUX CH name in the debug messages URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77276/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8488 -> Patchwork_17667 Summary ---

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Fix AUX power domain toggling across TypeC mode resets

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Fix AUX power domain toggling across TypeC mode resets URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77280/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 9e1af8dc676e drm/i915: Fix AUX power domain toggling across TypeC mode resets -:15:

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/execlists: Shortcircuit queue_prio() for no internal levels

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/execlists: Shortcircuit queue_prio() for no internal levels URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77278/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8488 -> Patchwork_17668 S

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 00/14] In order to readout DP SDPs, refactors the handling of DP SDPs

2020-05-15 Thread Mun, Gwan-gyeong
Hi Ville, Thank you for notifying me that. I definitely missed the crash. Sorry for that. Danial and Jani, I' under debugging the crash case. If you are availabe please do not merge current version. Br, G.G. > On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 16:14 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 04:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix AUX power domain toggling across TypeC mode resets

2020-05-15 Thread Imre Deak
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 07:21:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:45:53PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > Make sure to select the port's AUX power domain while holding the TC > > port lock. The domain depends on the port's current TC mode, which may > > get changed under us if

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix AUX power domain toggling across TypeC mode resets

2020-05-15 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:24:45PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 07:21:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:45:53PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > > Make sure to select the port's AUX power domain while holding the TC > > > port lock. The domain depends o

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Measure dispatch latency

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
A useful metric of the system's health is how fast we can tell the GPU to do various actions, so measure our latency. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Mika Kuoppala --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c | 521 ++ 1 file changed, 521 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Fix AUX power domain toggling across TypeC mode resets

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Fix AUX power domain toggling across TypeC mode resets URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77280/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8488 -> Patchwork_17669 Summa

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Measure dispatch latency

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
A useful metric of the system's health is how fast we can tell the GPU to do various actions, so measure our latency. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Mika Kuoppala --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c | 612 ++ 1 file changed, 612 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Measure dispatch latency

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
A useful metric of the system's health is how fast we can tell the GPU to do various actions, so measure our latency. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Mika Kuoppala --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c | 612 ++ 1 file changed, 612 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] GPU-bound energy efficiency improvements for the intel_pstate driver (v2.99)

2020-05-15 Thread Valentin Schneider
On 15/05/20 01:48, Francisco Jerez wrote: > Valentin Schneider writes: > >> (+Lukasz) >> >> On 11/05/20 22:01, Francisco Jerez wrote: What I'm missing is an explanation for why this isn't using the infrastructure that was build for these kinds of things? The thermal framework, was

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77281/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8489 -> Patchwork_17670 Summary --- **SUCCE

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing virtual engines

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/selftests: Add tests for timeslicing virtual engines URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77274/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8488_full -> Patchwork_17666_full

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Add {preemph, voltage}_max() vfuncs

2020-05-15 Thread Manasi Navare
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:41:42PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Different platforms have different max vswing/preemph settings. > Turn that into a pair vfuncs so we can decouple intel_dp.c and > intel_ddi.c further. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä This is so much clea

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/hdcp: Update CP as per the kernel internal state (rev4)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/hdcp: Update CP as per the kernel internal state (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72251/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8489 -> Patchwork_17671 Summa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Reverse preemph vs. voltage swing preference

2020-05-15 Thread Manasi Navare
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:41:43PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > The DP spec says: > "When the combination of the requested pre-emphasis level and > voltage swing exceeds the capability of a DPTX, the DPTX shall > set the pre-emphasis level according to the request and u

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Replace some hand rolled max()s

2020-05-15 Thread Manasi Navare
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:41:45PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Use max() instead of hand rolling it. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare Manasi > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 9 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: avoid unused scale_user_to_hw() warning (rev2)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: avoid unused scale_user_to_hw() warning (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/76682/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8489 -> Patchwork_17672 Summary -

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Keep rps pinned during time critical tests

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
The timeslice queue tries to complete a round-robin discovery of a deep and pathological semaphore chain within a certain time limit. It helps if we can keep RPS pinned during this so that we do not waste time on a slow GPU. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77305/ State : failure == Summary == Applying: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree Using index info to

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/execlists: Shortcircuit queue_prio() for no internal levels

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/execlists: Shortcircuit queue_prio() for no internal levels URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77278/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8488_full -> Patchwork_17668_full =

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/selftests: Measure dispatch latency (rev4)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/selftests: Measure dispatch latency (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77308/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 8323202f9b72 drm/i915/selftests: Measure dispatch latency -:448: CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Reverse preemph vs. voltage swing preference

2020-05-15 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:18:22PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:41:43PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > The DP spec says: > > "When the combination of the requested pre-emphasis level and > > voltage swing exceeds the capability of a DPTX,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Retry faulthandlers on ENOSPC

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
As we no longer use the shmemfs allocation directly, we do not expect to receive -ENOSPC from a backing store allocation. The potential sources for -ENOSPC are then our own internal eviction code, so the choice is either to kill the potential application with SIGBUS or to retry the faulthandler. I

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Measure dispatch latency (rev4)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/selftests: Measure dispatch latency (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77308/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8489 -> Patchwork_17674 Summary ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: avoid unused scale_user_to_hw() warning

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2020-04-28 22:30:50) > After the function is no longer marked 'inline', there > is now a new warning pointing out that the only caller > is inside of an #ifdef: > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c:493:12: warning: > 'scale_user_to_hw' defined but not used [-Wunus

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Fix AUX power domain toggling across TypeC mode resets

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Fix AUX power domain toggling across TypeC mode resets URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77280/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8488_full -> Patchwork_17669_full =

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mst: filter out the display mode exceed sink's capability

2020-05-15 Thread Lyude Paul
sorry it's been taking me a while to get back to you with these, crunch time at my work started so i've been really busy over the last week. On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 07:19 +0800, Lee Shawn C wrote: > So far, max dot clock rate for MST mode rely on physcial > bandwidth limitation. It would caused comp

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Keep rps pinned during time critical tests

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/selftests: Keep rps pinned during time critical tests URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77313/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8489 -> Patchwork_17675 Summary

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Retry faulthandlers on ENOSPC

2020-05-15 Thread Matthew Auld
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 21:01, Chris Wilson wrote: > > As we no longer use the shmemfs allocation directly, we do not expect to > receive -ENOSPC from a backing store allocation. The potential sources > for -ENOSPC are then our own internal eviction code, so the choice is > either to kill the poten

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Restore to default heartbeat

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
Since we temporarily disable the heartbeat and restore back to the default value, we can use the stored defaults on the engine and avoid using a local. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c | 25 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 67 ++

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/selftests: Check for an initial-breadcrumb in wait_for_submit()

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Wilson
When we look at i915_request_is_started() we must be careful in case we are using a request that does not have the initial-breadcrumb and instead the is-started is being compared against the end of the previous request. This will make wait_for_submit() declare that a request has been already submit

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77281/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8489_full -> Patchwork_17670_full Summary ---

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/gem: Retry faulthandlers on ENOSPC

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gem: Retry faulthandlers on ENOSPC URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77314/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8491 -> Patchwork_17676 Summary --- **SUCCE

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/hdcp: Update CP as per the kernel internal state (rev4)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/hdcp: Update CP as per the kernel internal state (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72251/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8489_full -> Patchwork_17671_full =

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Restore to default heartbeat

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Restore to default heartbeat URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77315/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8491 -> Patchwork_17677 ===

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: avoid unused scale_user_to_hw() warning (rev2)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: avoid unused scale_user_to_hw() warning (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/76682/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8489_full -> Patchwork_17672_full Sum

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Measure dispatch latency (rev4)

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/selftests: Measure dispatch latency (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77308/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8489_full -> Patchwork_17674_full Summary

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Keep rps pinned during time critical tests

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/selftests: Keep rps pinned during time critical tests URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77313/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8489_full -> Patchwork_17675_full ===

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Mark check_shadow_context_ppgtt as maybe unused

2020-05-15 Thread Nathan Chancellor
When CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM is not set, clang warns: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c:884:1: warning: function 'check_shadow_context_ppgtt' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration] check_shadow_context_ppgtt(struct execlist_ring_context *c, struct intel_vgpu_m

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Mark check_shadow_context_ppgtt as maybe unused

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Mark check_shadow_context_ppgtt as maybe unused URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77317/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8491 -> Patchwork_17678 Summary

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/gem: Retry faulthandlers on ENOSPC

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gem: Retry faulthandlers on ENOSPC URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77314/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8491_full -> Patchwork_17676_full Summary ---

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Mark check_shadow_context_ppgtt as maybe unused

2020-05-15 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915: Mark check_shadow_context_ppgtt as maybe unused URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77317/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8491_full -> Patchwork_17678_full Su